초등학교 학생들의 과학 그림 그리기 선호 유형 조사
An Investigation on the Students' Preference Types of Science Drawing in Elementary School
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Drawing is an important tool of expressing the learning results. In this study, we analyzed the 526 pictures of third grade and fifth grade children’s learning results in biology unit. The category were types of picture, completion degree and presentation degree of scientific drawing. It also suggests effective method of scientific drawing. Drawing the result of observation is the way to express scientific contents and one of the process of record learning results. Through analyzing those pictures of learning results by the elements of patterns, completion and scientific expressiveness, we tried to find out effective method of scientific drawing. The subjects of analyses are 526 pictures of biology unit that four categories of 243 third graders and 283 of fifth graders. In consequence, 71.9% of Children chose drawing and small differences are observed between two graders. The drawing process of fifth grader’s structure of flower turned out to diagrams, the ratio of total was 1.6%. Cartoons are shown 11.9%, to the third graders who are lower graders however fifth graders are shown only 0.7% so distinction is observed between two grades and the ratio of whole was 6.3%. Only 12.3% of students are chose writing instead of drawing. The completion of pictures turned out that 41.0% of third grader and 66.5% of fifth grader finished drawing as unfinished condition. The case of fifth graders, delicate depiction was merely seen as 8.4%, therefore it is shown that appropriate guide is necessary. The result of analyze students’ scientific expressiveness, upper intermediate lever of realistic description was 43.6%, which is less than half, so that observer’s subjective point of view intervene at the observation and exaggeration, distortion and omission are occurred while process. Therefore, it is necessary to discipline the method of concrete observation and effective method of express the consequence that observed. Since children’s drawing style is changing by the stages of development, textbook and work book require appropriate standard and instructions about pictorial expression. Furthermore, concrete operational stage and transition period should be classified.
Abstract
Drawing is an important tool of expressing the learning results. In this study, we analyzed the 526 pictures of third grade and fifth grade children’s learning results in biology unit. The category were types of picture, completion degree and presentation degree of scientific drawing. It also suggests effective method of scientific drawing. Drawing the result of observation is the way to express scientific contents and one of the process of record learning results. Through analyzing those pictures of learning results by the elements of patterns, completion and scientific expressiveness, we tried to find out effective method of scientific drawing. The subjects of analyses are 526 pictures of biology unit that four categories of 243 third graders and 283 of fifth graders. In consequence, 71.9% of Children chose drawing and small differences are observed between two graders. The drawing process of fifth grader’s structure of flower turned out to diagrams, the ratio of total was 1.6%. Cartoons are shown 11.9%, to the third graders who are lower graders however fifth graders are shown only 0.7% so distinction is observed between two grades and the ratio of whole was 6.3%. Only 12.3% of students are chose writing instead of drawing. The completion of pictures turned out that 41.0% of third grader and 66.5% of fifth grader finished drawing as unfinished condition. The case of fifth graders, delicate depiction was merely seen as 8.4%, therefore it is shown that appropriate guide is necessary. The result of analyze students’ scientific expressiveness, upper intermediate lever of realistic description was 43.6%, which is less than half, so that observer’s subjective point of view intervene at the observation and exaggeration, distortion and omission are occurred while process. Therefore, it is necessary to discipline the method of concrete observation and effective method of express the consequence that observed. Since children’s drawing style is changing by the stages of development, textbook and work book require appropriate standard and instructions about pictorial expression. Furthermore, concrete operational stage and transition period should be classified.
참고문헌 (20)
- 강훈식, "제7차 초등학교 3~6학년 과학 교과서에 제시된 외적 표상들의 활용 실태 분석", 초등과학교육, 27(2), pp.158~169 (2008), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 김영수, "교육공학연구" (1994), 교육과학사
- 김영신, "초등학교 과학 영재아와 일반 학생의 관찰 방법과 행동 비교 연구", 한국생물교육학회지, 34(4), pp.432~438 (2006), 한국생물교육학회
- 박지영, "초등학교 학생들의 과학 글쓰기 선호 유형 조사-생명 영역을 중심으로-", 생물교육, 36(4), pp.600~609 (2008), 한국생물교육학회
- 심영옥, "아동미술활동의 길라잡이 미술교육과정의 이해", pp.431~ (2008), 창지사
- 양일호, "초등학생들은 과학 교과서에 나오는 삽화를 어떻게 이해하고 있을까?", 초등과학교육, 26(5), pp.475~488 (2007), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 여성희, "제 7차 교육과정에 따른 초등학교 5학년 과학교과서의 과학 탐구 과정과 학생들의 과학 탐구 능력 실태 분석", 한국생물교육학회지, 31(3), pp.214~223 (2003), 한국생물교육학회
- 윤은희, "만화를 활용한 학습이 물의 순환 개념에 미치는 효과", 석사, pp.2005
- 이용주, "개념도를 활용한 초등학교 과학 수업에서 학습 성향에 따른 아동의 지식 구조 변화 매’ 단원을 중심으로 -", 한국생물교육학회지, 35(3), pp.374~383 (2007), 한국생물교육학회
- 이은정, "중학교 유전 단원의 오개념 교정을 위한 학습 만화 프로그램의 개발 및 적용", 한국생물교육학회지, 34(3), pp.355~364 (2006), 한국생물교육학회
- 이형철, "한,일 초등학교 과학 교과서 삽화 비교 연구", 초등과학교육, 24(2), pp.138~144 (2005), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 임채성, "초등학교 아동의 생물에 대한 협동관찰의 효과", 한국생물교육학회지, 28(1), pp.31~40 (2000)
- 정정인, "초등학교 과학 교과서에서 사용된 보조적 시각 자료의 분류 및 분석", 초등과학교육, 26(5), pp.525~534 (2007), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 최인숙, "창의적인 문제해결력과 전뇌발달을 위한 과학주제중심 다중지능 통합교육", pp.454~ (2009), 학지사
- 최주영, "초등 생물 교육에서의 창의력 계발을 위한 포트폴리오 체제 개발- 6-2 “쾌적한 환경” 단원을 중심으로 -", 한국생물교육학회지, 32(1), pp.41~53 (2004), 한국생물교육학회
- 한은주, "중학교 전기와 자기학습에서 만화의 활용이 과학 학습 태도와 학업 성취도에 미치는 영향", 석사, pp.2001
- 한재영, "과학 교과서에 사용된 화살표의 의미", 초등과학교육, 25(3), pp.244~256 (2006), 한국초등과학교육학회
- Edens, K. M., "Using descriptive drawings as a conceptual change strategy in elementary science", School Science and Mathematics, 103(3), pp.135~144 (2003)
- Stephen R.Williams, "Scientific drawing in biology", The Ohio Journal of Science, 17(6), pp.205~212 (1917)
