본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

소집단 실험 수업에서 나타난 예비교사-고등학생의 상호작용의 특징

Characteristics of Interaction between Pre-service Teachers andHigh School Students during Small Group Practical Work

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

The purpose of this study was to address pre-service science teachers’ competency for practical work-based instruction by analyzing the features of interaction between pre-service teachers and high school students. To do this, classroom data was collected including two groups consisting of two mentors and four mentees during the small group work phase of two instructions. The result shows that interaction sustained longer during the discussion phase than the hands-work phase, suggesting the influence of the subject who initiated the interaction by asking questions. During the discussion phase, both traditional and inquiry-oriented modes of interaction were evenly identified with an emphasis of cognitive aspects, whereas traditional mode with an emphasis of practical skills prevailed over during the hands-work phase. The factors which influenced such interactional features included the features of the phase, students’ participation, mentor’s competence, and instructional plans and preparations. Although the pre-service teachers in this study were aware that practical work should be inquiry-based, in their actual practice, traditional mode of interaction was prevalent. This suggests further that they focused on the success of practical work itself as it was designed, and as a result, less attention was paid to the purpose or meanings of the work. Also, pre-service teachers need to have actual experiences of what might be more inquiring mode of interaction.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to address pre-service science teachers’ competency for practical work-based instruction by analyzing the features of interaction between pre-service teachers and high school students. To do this, classroom data was collected including two groups consisting of two mentors and four mentees during the small group work phase of two instructions. The result shows that interaction sustained longer during the discussion phase than the hands-work phase, suggesting the influence of the subject who initiated the interaction by asking questions. During the discussion phase, both traditional and inquiry-oriented modes of interaction were evenly identified with an emphasis of cognitive aspects, whereas traditional mode with an emphasis of practical skills prevailed over during the hands-work phase. The factors which influenced such interactional features included the features of the phase, students’ participation, mentor’s competence, and instructional plans and preparations. Although the pre-service teachers in this study were aware that practical work should be inquiry-based, in their actual practice, traditional mode of interaction was prevalent. This suggests further that they focused on the success of practical work itself as it was designed, and as a result, less attention was paid to the purpose or meanings of the work. Also, pre-service teachers need to have actual experiences of what might be more inquiring mode of interaction.

참고문헌 (31)

  1. Bencze, J. L., "Tea-chers' tendencies to promote student-led science projects : Associations with their views about science", Science Education, 90(3), pp.400~419 (2006)
  2. Carlsen, W. S., "Never ask a question if you don't know the answer : The tension in teaching between modeling scientific argument and maintaining law and order", Journal of Classroom Interaction, 32(2), pp.14~23 (1997)
  3. Chin, C., "Teacher questioning in science classrooms : Approaches that stimulate productive thinking", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), pp.815~843 (2007)
  4. 최경희, "중학교 과학 수업에서 교사와 학생의 언어적 상호작용 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 24(6), pp.1039~1048 (2004), 한국과학교육학회
  5. Driver, R., "Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom", Educational Researcher, 23(7), pp.5~12 (1994)
  6. Driver, R., "Constructivism in Education", pp.385~400 (1995), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc
  7. Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., ""Doing the lesson"or"doing science" : Argument in high school genetics", Science Education, 84(6), pp.757~792 (2000)
  8. Edward, D., "Common Knowledge : The Development of Understanding in the Classroom" (1987), Routledge
  9. Hodson D., "Teaching and Learning about Science:Language, Theories, Methods, History, Traditionas and Values" (2009), Sense Publishers
  10. 정진우, "중학교 과학 실험 수업에서 초임 과학 교사들의 탐구 지도 수준 분석", 한국지구과학회지, 27(4), pp.364~373 (2006), 한국지구과학회
  11. Jo, I., "Analysis of question patterns appearing in teaching demonstration which applied science teachings model prepared by a preservice biology teacher", Jornal of Science Education, 36(2), pp.167~185 (2012)
  12. Kang, N., "Secondary science teachers' use of laboratory activities : Linking epistemological beliefs, goals and practices", Science Education, 89(1), pp.140~165 (2005)
  13. 김동현, "초등 과학영재 수업에서의 언어적 상호작용 사례 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 31(8), pp.1145~1157 (2011), 한국과학교육학회
  14. 강성주, "실생활 소재 탐구 실험 형태에 따른 학생-학생 언어적 상호작용에서의 학습 접근 수준 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 26(1), pp.16~24 (2006), 한국과학교육학회
  15. 권용주, "선언적 과학 지식의 생성 과정에 대한 과학철학적 연구: 귀납적, 귀추적, 연역적 과정을 중심으로", 한국과학교육학회지, 23(3), pp.215~228 (2003), 한국과학교육학회
  16. 이봉우, "외국 과학교육과정의 탐구기준 비교 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 25(7), pp.873~884 (2005), 한국과학교육학회
  17. 이은주, "탐구 기능의 직접적 수업을 위한 탐구 기능 하위 요소 추출", 한국과학교육학회지, 32(2), pp.236~264 (2012), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  18. 이정아, "정보 흐름 관점에서 본 초등 예비교사의 과학 수업 평가와 반성을 위한 담화 분석의 실제", 초등과학교육, 30(3), pp.367~378 (2011), 한국초등과학교육학회
  19. 이화진, "생물 예비교사들의 수업 실습에서 대화적 담화를 중심으로 나타난 수업 전문성", 생물교육, 41(2), pp.181~197 (2013), 한국생물교육학회
  20. 이현영, "사회적 상호작용을 강조한 과학 탐구실험 과정에서 학생-학생 상호작용 양상 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 22(3), pp.660~670 (2002), 한국과학교육학회
  21. 권용주, "초등학생들과 초등예비교사들이 관찰활동에서 생성한 과학적 의문의 유형", 한국과학교육학회지, 24(5), pp.1018~1027 (2004), 한국과학교육학회
  22. Lee, S., "과학교사의 수업전문성 : 연구와 실행", pp.103~106 (2012), Kyoukkoahaksa
  23. Mercer, N., "Children's talk and the development of reasoning in the classroom", British Educational Research Journal, 25(1), pp.95~112 (1999)
  24. Mortimer, E. F., "Meaning Making in Secondary Science Classrooms" (2003), Open University Press
  25. 남정희, "멘토링을 통한 초임중등과학교사의 수업에서의교사․학생 상호작용 변화 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 30(8), pp.953~970 (2010), 한국과학교육학회
  26. 오세덕, "중학교 생물 수업에서 나타나는 대화적 담화의 수업 맥락과 상호작용 패턴에 관한 사례 연구 : 교사의 말하기를 중심으로", 생물교육, 38(4), pp.657~674 (2010), 한국생물교육학회
  27. Roth, W. M., "Authentic School Science: Knowing and Learning in Open-Inquiry Science Laboratories" (1995), Kluwer
  28. 심현표, "예비교사의 실험 수업에 대한 반성적 논의의 특징", 한국과학교육학회지, 33(5), pp.911~931 (2013), 한국과학교육학회
  29. Tamir, P., "Inquiry-related tasks in high school science laboratory handbooks", Science Education, 67(5), pp.477~484 (1981)
  30. Wellington, J. J., "Practical Work in School Science: which way now?", pp.3~15 (1998), Routledge
  31. 양일호, "중등학교 과학 실험 수업에 대한 실험 목적·상호 작용·탐구 과정의 분석", 한국지구과학회지, 27(5), pp.509~520 (2006), 한국지구과학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)