본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

외국파트너쉽에 대한 과세-외국사업체의 세법상 분류를 중심으로-

Taxation on foreign partnership- Focusing on the classification of foreign entities according to tax laws -

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

The taxation on a foreign entity depends on how this entity is classified according to the domestic tax laws. It is not easy to establish the classification criteria as each country has its own civil law and tax system. However, as the international trades become common place and more foreign entities actively conduct operation in Korea, it is imperative that Korea suggest a certain classification criteria as other countries do. The classification of foreign entity according to its characteristics related to civil law as adopted by Germany and Japan is desirable in Korea because that system can maintain the consistency with the existing domestic entity classification system. In addition, even though the classification system of foreign entities is established in consistent with the existing classification system, there are some cases in which the different tax treatment can conflict with each other on one entity, depending on the countries. These hybrid entity issues are related to whether those entities should be granted the tax treaty benefit. If we look at the international trends on these issues, the OECD report, US’s model tax treaty and other tax treaties suggests the method in which the tax is levied on the person which gets the income from the entity. I think that Korea should establish the pass-through taxation on these entities including the partnerships, taking into consideration the international taxation trends.

Abstract

The taxation on a foreign entity depends on how this entity is classified according to the domestic tax laws. It is not easy to establish the classification criteria as each country has its own civil law and tax system. However, as the international trades become common place and more foreign entities actively conduct operation in Korea, it is imperative that Korea suggest a certain classification criteria as other countries do. The classification of foreign entity according to its characteristics related to civil law as adopted by Germany and Japan is desirable in Korea because that system can maintain the consistency with the existing domestic entity classification system. In addition, even though the classification system of foreign entities is established in consistent with the existing classification system, there are some cases in which the different tax treatment can conflict with each other on one entity, depending on the countries. These hybrid entity issues are related to whether those entities should be granted the tax treaty benefit. If we look at the international trends on these issues, the OECD report, US’s model tax treaty and other tax treaties suggests the method in which the tax is levied on the person which gets the income from the entity. I think that Korea should establish the pass-through taxation on these entities including the partnerships, taking into consideration the international taxation trends.

참고문헌 (39)

  1. "외국계 펀드의 국내투자 현황과 관련 법적문제", 5(2) (2004)
  2. "美國 有限責任會社(LLC)의 특징과 설립", 20(3) (2001), 韓國商事法學會
  3. "美國 有限責任會社의 특성에 관한 硏究", 8(2) (2002), 延世法學會
  4. "새로운 기업유형의 도입에 관한 연구", 23(1) (2004), 韓國商事法學會
  5. "기업설립형태별 과세체계에 관한 연구" (2005), 韓國稅法硏究會
  6. "파트너쉽에 대한 적정과세방안 연구" (2002), 재경부 보고서
  7. "독일법상 인적회사와 조합의 과세", 19 (2003), 國際租稅協會
  8. "파트너쉽와 국제과세", pp.韓國稅法硏究會~ (2004)
  9. "商法總則·商行爲" (2005), 博英社
  10. "會社法講義" (2006), 博英社
  11. "租稅法講義" (2002), 博英社
  12. "法人格 없는 團體의 稅法上 取扱 조세연구포럼", 3 (2003)
  13. "조합과세제도 도입방안", 27 (2001), 서울시립대학교 도시과학연구원
  14. "인적회사의 과세방안 - 파트너쉽 방식과 S corporation 방식의 비교검토를 통한 입법안" (2005), 韓國稅法硏究會
  15. "パトナシップの課問題", 44 (2000)
  16. "LLP LLC 理論と務" (2005), 財經詳報社
  17. "組織形態の多化と所得課" (2002)
  18. "新しい組織と制フィナンシャルレビュ" (2002)
  19. "組合課 簡素、柔軟、公平な組合課の提案", 30 (2002)
  20. "ドイツにおける人的社(共同事業者)", 44 (2000)
  21. "パトナシップ課の際的側面", 日論集, pp.44~ (2000)
  22. "租調査究報告書 第6 外事業課のあり方について", 563 (2002)
  23. "多な事業組織をめぐる制上の問題点", 69 (2003)
  24. "投資ファンド制の際的側面", 55 (2004)
  25. "新たな事業と組合制", 69 (2003)
  26. "わがにおける法人形態の多化と制の展望", 523 (2004)
  27. "組合の務問題と米のパトナシップ課", 523 (2004)
  28. "Partnership Taxation. 6th ed" (1997)
  29. "Federal Taxation of Income" (1991)
  30. "Federal Income Taxation of Partners and Partnerships in a Nutshell 3rd ed" (2005)
  31. "Partnerships - France" (2006), IBFD Online Publication
  32. "Steuerrecht" (2002), Kln
  33. "Hybrid Entities and the U.S. Model Income Tax Treaty" (1999)
  34. "The New Partnership Approach in the Belgium-Netherlands Tax Treaty", 32(3) (2004)
  35. "A Comparison Between the U.S. and OECD Approaches to Hybrid Entities" (2004)
  36. "International tax problems of partnership" (1995), IFA
  37. "Characterization of Others States' Partnerships for Income Tax", 56(7) (2002)
  38. "Recognition of Foriegn Enterprise as taxable entity" (1988)
  39. "The Application of the OECD Model Tax Convention to Partnerships", (6) (1999), OECD

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)