본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

2009 개정 및 2015 개정 교육과정에 따른 초등과학 식물의 구조와 기능 단원의 성취기준 및 탐구활동 비교 분석

Comparison of Achievement Standards and Inquiry Activity of the Structure and Function of Plants Unit between the 2009 and 2015 Revised National Curriculum

심규철|김경호
한국생물교육학회 (The Korean Society of Biology Education)|2019.12|생물교육 (BIOLOGY EDUCATION)|제47권 제4호|pp. 552-560|DOI 10.15717/bioedu.2019.47.4.552

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

achievement standards2009 revisionelementary school scienceinquiry activitystructure and function of plants2015 revisionscience national curriculum
주제분류교육학

초록

The purpose of this study is to examine comparatively the achievement standards and inquiry activities of “the structure and function of plants” unit according to the 2009 revision and 2015 revision of elementary school science national curriculum. There were decreased the number of achievement standards and inquiry activities of unit “the structure and function of plants” in 2015 revised rather than 2009 revised science national curriculum. However, there was a little bit differences between learning contents of them. For inquiry activity types of “the structure and function of plants” presented in science textbooks, there were more diverse in the 2015 revised elemenatry school science textbooks than the 2009 revised elemenatry school science textbooks, and even more inquiry process skills in the 2015 revision of elementary school science textbooks were than in the 2009 revision. it was found out that learning contents should be harmonized in aspects of balancing learning objective domains and considering environment curricula. In order to achieve the goal of elementary school science education on the basis of science national curriculum in elementary school, the consistency between science textbooks and science national curriculum should be considered and that can be contribute to the development of future science national curriculum.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine comparatively the achievement standards and inquiry activities of “the structure and function of plants” unit according to the 2009 revision and 2015 revision of elementary school science national curriculum. There were decreased the number of achievement standards and inquiry activities of unit “the structure and function of plants” in 2015 revised rather than 2009 revised science national curriculum. However, there was a little bit differences between learning contents of them. For inquiry activity types of “the structure and function of plants” presented in science textbooks, there were more diverse in the 2015 revised elemenatry school science textbooks than the 2009 revised elemenatry school science textbooks, and even more inquiry process skills in the 2015 revision of elementary school science textbooks were than in the 2009 revision. it was found out that learning contents should be harmonized in aspects of balancing learning objective domains and considering environment curricula. In order to achieve the goal of elementary school science education on the basis of science national curriculum in elementary school, the consistency between science textbooks and science national curriculum should be considered and that can be contribute to the development of future science national curriculum.

참고문헌 (43)

  1. Chiang-Soong, B, "The inclusion of STS material in the most frequently used secondary science textbooks in the U. S", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(4), pp.339~349 (1993)
  2. 최도성, "한국과 미국 초등학교 과학과 교육과정 및 교과서 비교 연구", 한국초등교육, 24(2), pp.151~166 (2013), 초등교육연구원[DOI]
  3. DFE(Department for Education), "The National Curriculum in England Framework Document" (2013), Department for Education, UK
  4. Duschl, R, "Learning progressions and teaching sequences : A review and analysis", Studies in Science Education, 47, pp.123~182 (2011)
  5. Hodson, D, "Laboratory work as scientific method: Three decades of confusion and distortion", Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28, pp.115~135 (1996)
  6. Kaasinen, A, "Plant species recognition skills in finnish students and teachers", Educational Science, 9(2), pp.85~ (2019)[DOI]
  7. Study on the Development of the Draft 2015 Revised National Curriculum II - Study on Subject Curriculum Guidelines Meditation, "KICE (Korea Institute of Curriculum and Evaluation)", Korea Institute of Curriculum and Evaluation, ~, pp.Report CRC 2015- 25-1 (2015)
  8. Basic Research for Next Generation Science Education Standards, "Kim, H", Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity, ~ (2017)
  9. A Study on the Development of Evaluation Standards of Elementary and Middle School Science according to the 2015 Revised National Curriculum, "Kim, H", Korea Institute of Curriculum and Evaluation, ~, pp.Report CRC 2016-2-1 (2016)
  10. 김정민, "초등 과학교과 교사용 지도서 생명 영역 단원 및 차시 목표의 일관성 분석", 초등과학교육, 27(1), pp.75~82 (2008), 한국초등과학교육학회
  11. Study on the Development of the Draft 2015 Revised Science National Curriculum, "KOFAC(Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity).", Ministry of Education, ~ (2015)
  12. 이병천, "영어교과 평가의 성취기준 비교 분석", 중등영어교육, 11(4), pp.127~146 (2018), 한국중등영어교육학회[DOI]
  13. A Study of the Way to Improve Elementary School Curriculum, "Lee, M. S", Korea Institute of Curriculum and Evaluation, ~, pp.Report RRC 2014-3 (2014)
  14. Lee, O, "Science inquiry and student diversity : Enhanced abilities and continuing difficulties after an instructional intervention", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(7), pp.607~636 (2006)
  15. 신명경, "과학탐구의 핸즈온 활동 내용, 사고 활동 내용, 논리적 구조 측면에서의 초등 과학 교과서 분석 -지구와 우주 영역의 사례-", 교과교육학연구, 17(4), pp.1483~1499 (2013), 교과교육연구소[DOI]
  16. 이유언, "초등학교 ‘생물과 환경’ 단원의 위상과 수업 운영에 대한 초등교사의 인식", 생물교육, 47(3), pp.324~335 (2019), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
  17. 이윤하, "변인 통제 능력을 강화하기 위한 수업 프로그램의 개발 및 적용 효과 분석", 대한화학회지, 55(3), pp.519~528 (2011), 대한화학회
  18. McNeill, K. L, "Supporting students’ construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials", The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), pp.153~191 (2006)
  19. MOE(Ministry of Education), "2015 Revised Elementary School National Curriculum" (2015), Ministry of Education
  20. MOE(Ministry of Education), "General Guideline of the 2015 Revised Science National Curriculum for Elementary and Secondary School" (2015), Ministry of Education
  21. MOEST(Ministry of Education and Science Technology), "General Guideline of the 2009 Revised Science National Curriculum for Elementary and Secondary School" (2009), Ministry of Education and Science Technology
  22. MOEST(Ministry of Education and Science Technology), "2009 Revised Elementary School National Curriculum" (2011), Ministry of Education and Science Technology
  23. 남수경, "초등학교 교원의 교과서에 대한 인식과 평가", 한국교육, 37(3), pp.55~76 (2010), 한국교육개발원[DOI]
  24. NGSS Lead States, "Next Generation Science Standards: For States, by States" (2013), The National Academies Press
  25. NRC (National Research Council), "National Science Education Standards" (1996), The National Academies Press
  26. NRC(National Research Council), "A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas" (2012), National Academies Press
  27. OECD, "Definition and Selection of Competencies: Theoretical and Conceptual Foundations (DeSeCo)" (2003), OECD
  28. OECD, "Definition and Selection of Key Competencies: Executive Summary" (2005), OECD
  29. OECD, "Universal Basic Skills: What Countries Stand to Gain" (2015), OECD Publishing
  30. Pany, P, "Using students’ interest in useful plants to encourage plant vision in the classroom", Plants, People, Planet, 1, pp.261~270 (2019)
  31. 박현주, "화학 I 교과서의 학습 목표 및 평가 문항 분석", 대한화학회지, 56(4), pp.491~499 (2012), 대한화학회[DOI]
  32. 박재근, "2015 개정 초등 과학과 교육과정의 성취 기준과 탐구 활동 변화 분석", 초등과학교육, 36(1), pp.43~60 (2017), 한국초등과학교육학회[DOI]
  33. Basic Research for Improving the General Guideline of Science National Curriculum, "Park, S", Korea Institute of Curriculum and Evaluation, ~, pp.Report CRC 2014-1 (2014)
  34. 유인선, "귀화식물을 중심으로 한 초등학생 환경생태교육프로그램 개발", 한국초등교육, 27(3), pp.263~279 (2016), 초등교육연구원[DOI]
  35. Roth, W-M, "The development of science process skills in authentic contexts", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(2), pp.127~152 (1993)
  36. Shim, K. C, "Analysis of learning objectives on elementary school biology", Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 18(4), pp.539~544 (1998)
  37. 심규철, "초등 교과서에서 제시된 과학 탐구 활동의 분석", 초등과학교육, 26(1), pp.24~31 (2007), 한국초등과학교육학회
  38. 심예지, "2009 개정 교육과정 초등 과학 지도서에 제시된 학습 목표 및 평가 문항 목표 분석과 과학 관련 태도 영역 문항 개발", 현장과학교육, 11(1), pp.67~76 (2017), 한국현장과학교육학회[DOI]
  39. 송진주, "초등 실과 교과 생명과학 영역에서의 인성교육 프로그램 개발", 한국초등교육, 28(2), pp.31~47 (2017), 초등교육연구원[DOI]
  40. 송신철, "2015 개정 과학과 교육과정에 따른 초등학교 과학 교과의 탐구활동 유형 분석- 3~4학년군 과학 교과서를 중심으로 -", 생물교육, 47(3), pp.310~323 (2019), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
  41. 송신철, "초등 5~6학년군 과학 교과서에 제시된 탐구 활동 유형 분석", 초등과학교육, 38(4), pp.453~464 (2019), 한국초등과학교육학회[DOI]
  42. Windschitl, M, "Beyond the scientific method : Model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations", Science Education, 92(5), pp.941~967 (2008)
  43. 여상인, "과학 연극이 초등학생의 과학 태도에 미치는 영향", 초등과학교육, 27(4), pp.328~340 (2008), 한국초등과학교육학회

관련 논문AI추천

2015 개정 초등 과학과 교육과정의 성취 기준과 탐구 활동 변화 분석박재근한국초등과학교육학회 · 초등과학교육2017 · 제36권 제1호2009 개정 및 2015 개정 교육과정에 따른 초등과학 다양한 생물과 우리 생활 단원의 성취기준 및 학습내용 비교 분석한화정한국생물교육학회 · 생물교육2020 · 제48권 제2호2015 개정 과학 검정 교과서에서 ‘식물의 구조와 기능’ 단원 분석신원섭한국생물교육학회 · 생물교육2022 · 제50권 제4호교육과정 개정에 따른 초등학교 과학 교과서의식물의 구조와 기능 단원의 개념 네트워크 구조와 연계성김영신, 박신아, 임수민한국생물교육학회 · 생물교육2021 · 제49권 제1호초·중·고 식물 관련 단원의 탐구 활동과 교과서 본문 설명 개념 사이의 네트워크 변화 분석김영신한국생물교육학회 · 생물교육2020 · 제48권 제3호2015 개정 교육과정에 따른 초등학교 과학 교과서의 탐구 활동에 나타난 과학과 교과역량 분석송신철, 심규철한국생물교육학회 · 생물교육2020 · 제48권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)

국내 생물교육 분야의 질적 연구 동향- 「생물교육」 학회지를 중심으로 -김남일, 이영미, 강은희pp. 411-4212015 개정 교육과정에 따른 중·고등학교 과학과 교과서의 진화 관련 단원 내용 및 기능 분석간치멕, 정태영, 차희영pp. 422-437Bloom의 신교육목표분류에 기초한 2015 개정 교육과정 『생명과학 I』 성취기준과 교과서 학습목표 분석김형미, 강경희pp. 438-447예비 생물교사의 진화 개념에 대한 이해와 수업 내용 분석정은영, 윤영민pp. 448-465학교 안 야외 생태학습에서 관찰된 초등학생들의 참여 양상 변화와 그 요인 탐색주은정pp. 463-474
원문 보기