본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

2015 개정 과학과 교육과정에 따른 초등 5, 6학년 과학 검정교과서 생명 영역의 탐구활동 분석

Analysis of Inquiry Activities in the Field of Life in 5th and 6th Grade Elementary Science Authorized Textbooks according to the 2015 Revised Science Curriculum

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

In order to ensure teachers and students' right to choose, such as supporting diverse and creative curriculum autonomy and improving quality through competition, elementary science textbooks have been converted into authorized textbooks and operated from the 2022 school year. In 2022, it was applied to 3rd and 4th graders, and in 2023, it is being applied to 5th and 6th graders. Accordingly, this study attempted to obtain implications by comparing and analyzing the types of inquiry activities in the national textbooks and the newly developed 5th and 6th grade elementary science authorized textbooks. Types of inquiry activities were divided into six categories: experimental observation (EO), simulated activity (SA), investigation discussion and presentation (IP), data interpretation (ID), written reading (RW), and expression (EX). The research results are as follows. First, various types of inquiry activities appeared in nine types of authorized textbooks according to the characteristics of inquiry subjects. In other words, even if the subject is the same, different textbooks have different ways to solve it, and various types of inquiry activities are appearing. Second, looking at the inquiry activities of the 5th and 6th graders by grade, the main types of inquiry activities of the 5th graders were investigation, discussion and presentation (IP), and the 6th graders were experimental observation (EO). It can be seen that the type of inquiry activity focused on inducing students' participation in learning is intensively presented by reflecting the direction of revision of the curriculum to promote student participation-type classes. Third, looking at the types of inquiry activities in detail, experimental observation (EO) and simulated activities (SA) were the main types of inquiry activities with a rate of about 57.3%, and writing and reading (RW) types showed the lowest rate at about 1.5%. The proportion of simulated activities (SA) was 24.8%, which increased about 5 times compared to 3rd and 4th graders. It can be seen that there are many topics that need to be used. The type of reading and writing (RW) presented at the lowest rate can help increase understanding of scientific concepts and improve scientific thinking, so it is hoped that it will be tried in more diverse areas and topics in the next test textbook. As a result, the newly developed and planned 5th and 6th grade elementary science textbooks in the field of life reflect well the purpose of the 2015 revised science curriculum, and were developed based on the existing curriculum, but each publisher conducts various inquiry activities on the same subject. It can be seen that they are trying to secure autonomy and diversity in the curriculum.

Abstract

In order to ensure teachers and students' right to choose, such as supporting diverse and creative curriculum autonomy and improving quality through competition, elementary science textbooks have been converted into authorized textbooks and operated from the 2022 school year. In 2022, it was applied to 3rd and 4th graders, and in 2023, it is being applied to 5th and 6th graders. Accordingly, this study attempted to obtain implications by comparing and analyzing the types of inquiry activities in the national textbooks and the newly developed 5th and 6th grade elementary science authorized textbooks. Types of inquiry activities were divided into six categories: experimental observation (EO), simulated activity (SA), investigation discussion and presentation (IP), data interpretation (ID), written reading (RW), and expression (EX). The research results are as follows. First, various types of inquiry activities appeared in nine types of authorized textbooks according to the characteristics of inquiry subjects. In other words, even if the subject is the same, different textbooks have different ways to solve it, and various types of inquiry activities are appearing. Second, looking at the inquiry activities of the 5th and 6th graders by grade, the main types of inquiry activities of the 5th graders were investigation, discussion and presentation (IP), and the 6th graders were experimental observation (EO). It can be seen that the type of inquiry activity focused on inducing students' participation in learning is intensively presented by reflecting the direction of revision of the curriculum to promote student participation-type classes. Third, looking at the types of inquiry activities in detail, experimental observation (EO) and simulated activities (SA) were the main types of inquiry activities with a rate of about 57.3%, and writing and reading (RW) types showed the lowest rate at about 1.5%. The proportion of simulated activities (SA) was 24.8%, which increased about 5 times compared to 3rd and 4th graders. It can be seen that there are many topics that need to be used. The type of reading and writing (RW) presented at the lowest rate can help increase understanding of scientific concepts and improve scientific thinking, so it is hoped that it will be tried in more diverse areas and topics in the next test textbook. As a result, the newly developed and planned 5th and 6th grade elementary science textbooks in the field of life reflect well the purpose of the 2015 revised science curriculum, and were developed based on the existing curriculum, but each publisher conducts various inquiry activities on the same subject. It can be seen that they are trying to secure autonomy and diversity in the curriculum.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. Bae, M., "The effects of instruction of 'structure and function of human body' unit applying cognitive domaincentered brain-based evolutionary approach on the elementary school students' interest, achievement and scientific creativity", Master’s, pp.2017
  2. What Research Says to the Science Teacher, Volume 3, "Harms, N. C.", Science Education Information, ~ (1980)
  3. Hodoson, D., "Teaching and Learning Science: Towards a Personalized Approach" (1998), Open University Press
  4. 홍승호, "‘우리 몸의 구조와 기능’ 애니메이션 제작을 활용한 STEAM 프로그램 개발 및 적용 효과", 초등과학교육, 38(2), pp.263~274 (2019), 한국초등과학교육학회[DOI]
  5. 정수연, "2009 개정과 2015 개정 과학과 교육과정에 따른 고등학교 생명과학 Ⅱ 교과서의 탐구활동 유형 분석", 현장과학교육, 14(2), pp.160~174 (2020), 한국현장과학교육학회[DOI]
  6. Jung, E., "The development of teaching-learning materials for an instructional improvement in unit of the structure of human body of elementary school science", Master’s, pp.2008
  7. Jung, S., "Analysis of inquiry activities in the field of life in elementary science qualification textbooks according to the 2015 revised science curriculum", The 77th Annual Meeting of the Korean Association of Biological Sciences, 210, pp.71~ (2015)
  8. 김은정, "2015 개정 교육과정 초등학교 과학 검정교과서의 탐구활동 비교 분석 - 지층과 화석을 중심으로 -", 초등과학교육, 41(2), pp.295~306 (2022), 한국초등과학교육학회
  9. 김혜란, "초등과학 수업에서 언플러그드 컴퓨팅을 활용한 SW 융합교육프로그램의 개발과 적용 - 우리 몸의 구조와 기능 단원을 중심으로 -", 생물교육, 47(2), pp.213~222 (2019), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
  10. 김경호, "2009 개정 및 2015 개정 교육과정에 따른 초등과학 식물의 구조와 기능 단원의 성취기준 및 탐구활동 비교 분석", 생물교육, 47(4), pp.552~560 (2019), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
  11. Klopfer, L. E., "The teaching of science and the history of science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 6(1), pp.87~95 (1969)
  12. Lee, J., "A Study on the Changes in Textbook Publication in Korea" (2001), Iljin Publishing House
  13. 임성만, "우리나라 역대 초등학교 교과서에서 다루어진 ‘지구과학’ 영역의 중심개념과 탐구활동 분석 및 차기 교과서 개선 방안 모색", 초등과학교육, 34(3), pp.288~296 (2015), 한국초등과학교육학회[DOI]
  14. 임성만, "초등학교 과학교과서에 제시된 탐구활동의 교수전략, 유형, 개념과의 연관성 분석- 지구과학 영역을 중심으로 -", 초등과학교육, 39(3), pp.449~463 (2020), 한국초등과학교육학회[DOI]
  15. Science Curriculum Based on the 2015 Revised Curriculum, "Ministry of Education", Ministry of Education, ~, pp.Notification No. 2015-74 (2015)
  16. Announcement of National and Certification Classification of Digital Textbooks for Elementary and Secondary Schools According to the 2015 Revised Curriculum, "Ministry of Education", Ministry of Education, ~, pp.Notification No. 2016-89 (2019)
  17. Oh, Y., "Congratulatory Speech", Ministry of Education· Gy onggi-do Office of Education. Learner-Centered Textbook Improvement Forum (2018)
  18. Regarding the Diversification of Textbook Issuance System Research, "Park, C.", Ministry of Education·Korea Textbook Research Foundation, ~ (2017)
  19. 박형용, "2009 개정 과학과 교육과정에 따른 초등학교 과학 교과서 생명 영역의 탐구 활동 분석", 생물교육, 45(1), pp.177~189 (2017), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
  20. 박재근, "2015 개정 초등 과학과 교육과정의 성취 기준과 탐구 활동 변화 분석", 초등과학교육, 36(1), pp.43~60 (2017), 한국초등과학교육학회[DOI]
  21. 박진용, "국어 교과서 정책의 현황과 과제", 국어교육학연구, (42), pp.5~40 (2011), 국어교육학회[DOI]
  22. Shim, G., "Analysis of science inquiry activities presented in elementary school textbooks", Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 26(1), pp.24~31 (2007)
  23. 신명경, "과학탐구의 핸즈온 활동 내용, 사고 활동 내용, 논리적 구조 측면에서의 초등 과학 교과서 분석 -지구와 우주 영역의 사례-", 교과교육학연구, 17(4), pp.1483~1499 (2013), 교과교육연구소[DOI]
  24. 신명경, "2015 교육과정 초등학교 3, 4학년 과학교과서의 물리 관련 단원의 과학 활동 특징 및 과학의 인식론 탐색", 새물리, 69(7), pp.750~759 (2019), 한국물리학회[DOI]
  25. 신영준, "국민공통기본교육과정 과학과 생명영역에서의 탐구 활동 연계성 분석", 생물교육, 32(2), pp.135~141 (2004), 한국생물교육학회
  26. 송진웅, "2015 과학과 교육과정 개정의 주요 방향 및 쟁점 그리고 과학교실문화", 현장과학교육, 9(2), pp.72~84 (2015), 한국현장과학교육학회[DOI]
  27. 송신철, "고등학교 통합과학 교과서에 나타난 탐구활동 유형 분석", 생물교육, 46(1), pp.24~38 (2018), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
  28. Suchman, J. R., "Analyzes of Concept Learning", pp.177~187 (1966), Academic Press
  29. 양미선, "미생물 관련 학습 내용의 주제 및 활동에 대한 고등학생의 흥미", 생물교육, 42(1), pp.68~78 (2014), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
  30. Wallace, C. S., "Writing and Learning in the Science Classroom" (2007), Springer

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)