본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

화순 쌍봉사 극락전 아미타불 연화좌대의 수종 및 연륜연대 분석

Species Identification and Tree-Ring Dating of the Lotus Pedestal of Amitabha Statue at Ssangbong-Temple in Hwasun, Korea

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The objective of this study was to conduct the species identification and tree-ring dating of Lotus Pedestal of the Amitabha Statue at Ssangbong-Temple in Hwasun. The six wood blocks used for the Lotus Pedestal were hard pines (Pinus spp.; diploxilon) except one piece which was ginkgo (Ginkgo biloba L.). The lotus leaves surrounding the pedestal body were also made of ginkgo. Tree-ring patterns of 3 blocks were synchronized and a 133 years chronology was made. The chronology was crossdated well with the master chronology of Japanese red pine in South Korea. It dated back to A. D. 1551∼1683, i.e. the last ring dated A. D. 1683. Through the estimation of the number of sapwood rings removed during carving, the felling year was calculated A. D. 1704 ± 10. The calligraphic writing on the Pedestal indicated that this statue was made in A. D. 1694. Therefore, the accuracy of the tree-ring dating has been proven.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to conduct the species identification and tree-ring dating of Lotus Pedestal of the Amitabha Statue at Ssangbong-Temple in Hwasun. The six wood blocks used for the Lotus Pedestal were hard pines (Pinus spp.; diploxilon) except one piece which was ginkgo (Ginkgo biloba L.). The lotus leaves surrounding the pedestal body were also made of ginkgo. Tree-ring patterns of 3 blocks were synchronized and a 133 years chronology was made. The chronology was crossdated well with the master chronology of Japanese red pine in South Korea. It dated back to A. D. 1551∼1683, i.e. the last ring dated A. D. 1683. Through the estimation of the number of sapwood rings removed during carving, the felling year was calculated A. D. 1704 ± 10. The calligraphic writing on the Pedestal indicated that this statue was made in A. D. 1694. Therefore, the accuracy of the tree-ring dating has been proven.

참고문헌 (10)

  1. 김요정, "연륜연대와 목조불상 연구", 연륜연대와 미술사 학술 대회 논문집 (2009)
  2. 김요정, "연륜연대법을 이용한 목가구와 목공예품의 과학적 편년해석", 박사, pp.2006
  3. 박상진, "목재조직과 식별" (1987), 향문사
  4. 안성 칠장사 목조문화재 의 수종과 연륜연대, "박원규", 안성시, ~ (2009)
  5. 박원규, "전라도지역 조선후기 목조불상의 수종", 한국가구학회지, 21(1), pp.72~82 (2010), 한국가구학회
  6. "불교문화재 도난백서" (1999), 대한불교조계종 209
  7. 손병화, "목제품의 연륜연대 측정 을 위한 소나무 변재부의 연륜 개수 분석", 2004 학술한국가구학회지 (2004), 한국임학회
  8. 이필우, "한국산 목재의 성질과 용도" (1997), 서울대학교 출판부
  9. 윤승락, "한국산 유용수종의 목재성질" (2008), 국립산림과학원
  10. 최선일, "朝鮮後期 全羅道 彫刻僧 色難과 그 系譜", 미술사연구, 14(52) (2000)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)