본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

근로자파견법상 고용간주조항의 재검토

A Review of Employment Considering Article in Worker Dispatching Law

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Employment considering article in worker dispatching law has a legislative purpose to prevent business of dispatching from extending and popularizing by compelling employers to observe duty of direct employment. Meanwhile, it is regarded dispatched worker as employed worker when dispatching period is over 2 years, employers should make their option to terminate the dispatching contract or employ the dispatched worker and maintain labor relationship. This situation can also causes employment instability to dispatched worker. Although it is a disputable issue, it should be maintained direction to accomplish duty of direct employment because the direct employment is the aim of labor law. Even though the reason why employment considering article was revised to direct employment article in 2006 is not clear, we can not conclude that the reason is to correct unconstitutionality of employment considering article. As a sanction article against illegal dispatch is enforced, in my opinion, the purpose of the revision is that labor and management should make ‘the content’ of labor relationship clear in accordance with labor contract rather than ‘the effect’ of employment considering. Also, in revision of worker dispatching law in 2012. 2. it imposed a duty of direct employment on employers without reference to employment period when it comes to illegal dispatching case. With this, it can be concluded that a legislative settlement about a duty of direct employment to employers is fulfilled.

Abstract

Employment considering article in worker dispatching law has a legislative purpose to prevent business of dispatching from extending and popularizing by compelling employers to observe duty of direct employment. Meanwhile, it is regarded dispatched worker as employed worker when dispatching period is over 2 years, employers should make their option to terminate the dispatching contract or employ the dispatched worker and maintain labor relationship. This situation can also causes employment instability to dispatched worker. Although it is a disputable issue, it should be maintained direction to accomplish duty of direct employment because the direct employment is the aim of labor law. Even though the reason why employment considering article was revised to direct employment article in 2006 is not clear, we can not conclude that the reason is to correct unconstitutionality of employment considering article. As a sanction article against illegal dispatch is enforced, in my opinion, the purpose of the revision is that labor and management should make ‘the content’ of labor relationship clear in accordance with labor contract rather than ‘the effect’ of employment considering. Also, in revision of worker dispatching law in 2012. 2. it imposed a duty of direct employment on employers without reference to employment period when it comes to illegal dispatching case. With this, it can be concluded that a legislative settlement about a duty of direct employment to employers is fulfilled.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. 강성태, "사내하도급 삼부작 판결의 의의", 노동법학, (35), pp.1~36 (2010), 한국노동법학회
  2. 강성태, "위법파견의 사법(私法)적 효과", 노동법연구, (29), pp.67~93 (2010), 서울대학교노동법연구회
  3. 권혁, "도급의 대상으로서‘ 업무’와 위장도급 논쟁", 노동법포럼, (11), pp.97~121 (2013), 노동법이론실무학회
  4. 노상헌, "파견 및 사내도급근로에 관한 일본의 노동법리와 쟁점", 노동법연구, (19), pp.299~346 (2005), 서울대학교노동법연구회
  5. 박수근, "파견근로자의 직접고용에 대한 평가와 해석과제", 법학논총, 24(2) (2007), 법학연구소
  6. 박지순, "독일의 노동시장 및 노동법개혁", 노동법학, (18), pp.291~330 (2004), 한국노동법학회
  7. 박지순, "파견과 도급의 구별기준에 관한 독일과 한국의 판결 비교", 노동법포럼, (11), pp.59~95 (2013), 노동법이론실무학회
  8. 송강직, "일본 근로자파견법 ― 해석 및 운영을 중심으로 ―", 노동법연구, (23), pp.151~193 (2007), 서울대학교노동법연구회
  9. 유성재, "독일 근로자파견법의 개정과 시사점", 노동법학, (19), pp.1~28 (2004), 한국노동법학회
  10. 유성재, "주요국 근로자 판견법의 개정과 시사점- 獨逸·프랑스·日本을 中心으로", 중앙법학, 6(2), pp.229~261 (2004), 중앙법학회
  11. 이재용, "위장도급과 불법파견에 있어 고용관계", 노동법학, (22), pp.35~65 (2006), 한국노동법학회
  12. 이정, "일본 파견법상의 고용의무조항에 대한 고찰", 노동법포럼, (9), pp.41~72 (2012), 노동법이론실무학회
  13. 조경배, "직접고용의 원칙과 파견근로", 민주법학, (19) (2001)
  14. 조임영, "韓国における非正規職雇用の政策 - 期間制労働と派遣労働の使用を中心に-", 노동법논총, 24, pp.247~272 (2012), 한국비교노동법학회[DOI]
  15. 최홍엽, "파견기간초과시 고용간주규정의 해석", 노동법연구, (10) (2001)
  16. 菅野和夫, "講座21世紀の労働法 第2巻 労働市場の機構とルール" (2000), 有斐閣
  17. 大橋範雄, "派遣労働と人間の尊厳" (2007), 法律文化社

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)