Meta-analysis of the effects of smoking prevention programs for young adolescents
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This meta-analysis aimed to analyze the effects of smoking prevention programs for young adolescents at early smoking stages to identify the appropriate characteristics of prevention programs for this population. Methods: Searches of health-related databases and Google Scholar were conducted, and 23 randomized studies were included in the analysis. The main outcome variable was smoking behavior. The analysis was conducted using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software (version 3.0). Results: Smoking prevention programs significantly reduced smoking behaviors (OR=0.85, 95% CI=0.77~0.93). School-based programs (OR=0.79, 95% CI=0.75~0.83), programs by trained teachers or educators (OR=0.77, 95% CI=0.71~0.83), high-intensity programs (OR=0.82, 95% CI=0.75~0.91), and programs in an in-school setting (OR=0.82, 95% CI=0.74~0.90) had the most significant effect on reducing smoking behavior. Conclusion: For young adolescents, smoking prevention programs are most effective when they are school-based or highintensity programs, and when conducted by teachers or educators with proper training. Further studies are required since there was insufficient research to explore the effect of web-based programs or family-centered programs on adolescent smokers.
Abstract
Purpose: This meta-analysis aimed to analyze the effects of smoking prevention programs for young adolescents at early smoking stages to identify the appropriate characteristics of prevention programs for this population. Methods: Searches of health-related databases and Google Scholar were conducted, and 23 randomized studies were included in the analysis. The main outcome variable was smoking behavior. The analysis was conducted using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software (version 3.0). Results: Smoking prevention programs significantly reduced smoking behaviors (OR=0.85, 95% CI=0.77~0.93). School-based programs (OR=0.79, 95% CI=0.75~0.83), programs by trained teachers or educators (OR=0.77, 95% CI=0.71~0.83), high-intensity programs (OR=0.82, 95% CI=0.75~0.91), and programs in an in-school setting (OR=0.82, 95% CI=0.74~0.90) had the most significant effect on reducing smoking behavior. Conclusion: For young adolescents, smoking prevention programs are most effective when they are school-based or highintensity programs, and when conducted by teachers or educators with proper training. Further studies are required since there was insufficient research to explore the effect of web-based programs or family-centered programs on adolescent smokers.
참고문헌 (30)
- Strand TE, "Adolescent smoking and trends in lung cancer incidence among young adults in Norway 1954-1998", Cancer Causes and Control, 15(1), pp.27~33 (2004)[DOI]
- Kim YE, "Relationship between serum ferritin levels and dyslipidemia in Korean adolescents", PLoS One, 11(4), pp.e0153167~ (2016)[DOI]
- Curry SJ, "Therapy for specific problems : Youth tobacco cessation", Annual review of psychology, 60, pp.229~255 (2009)[DOI]
- "The fifteenth Korea youth risk behavior web-based survey in 2019" (2019)[URL]
- Casey BJ, "The adolescent brain", Developmental Review, 28(1), pp.62~77 (2008)[DOI]
- Petrescu DC, "What is the impact of e-cigarette adverts on children's perceptions of tobacco smoking? An experimental study", Tobacco Control, 26(4), pp.421~427 (2017)[DOI]
- Fergusson DM, "Transitions to cigarette smoking during adolescence", Addictive Behaviors, 20(5), pp.627~642 (1995)[DOI]
- 이종숙, "초등학생 대상 흡연예방 프로그램 효과에 대한 메타분석", 보건교육건강증진학회지, 34(4), pp.99~110 (2017), 한국보건교육건강증진학회[DOI]
- Thomas R Fanshawe, "Tobacco cessation interventions for young people", Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 11(11), pp.CD003289~ (2017), Wiley[DOI]
- 김윤경, "청소년금연프로그램효과의메타분석", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 38(2), pp.204~216 (2008), 한국간호과학회
- Corepal R, "Behavioural incentive interventions for health behaviour change in young people (5-18 years old): A systematic review and meta-analysis", Preventive Medicine, 110, pp.55~66 (2018)[DOI]
- De Kleijn MJJ, "Systematic review of school-based interventions to prevent smoking for girls", Systematic Reviews, 4, pp.109~ (2015)[DOI]
- Carson KV, "Community interventions for preventing smoking in young people", The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 7, pp.CD001291~ (2011)[DOI]
- Park E, "Systematic review : Internet-based program for youth smoking prevention and cessation", Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 47(1), pp.43~50 (2015)[DOI]
- Sussman S, "A meta-analysis of teen cigarette smoking cessation", Health Psychology, 25(5), pp.549~557 (2006)[DOI]
- Brinker TJ, "A medical student-delivered smoking prevention program, education against tobacco, for secondary schools in Germany : Randomized controlled trial", Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(6), pp.e199~ (2017)[DOI]
- Valdivieso Lopez E, "Efficacy of a smoking prevention programme in Catalan secondary schools : A cluster-randomized controlled trial in Spain", Addiction, 110(5), pp.852~860 (2015)[DOI]
- Bast LS, "High impact of implementation on school-based smoking prevention: The X: IT study-a cluster-randomized smoking prevention trial", Implementation Science, 11(1), pp.125~ (2016)[DOI]
- Baldus C, "Evaluation of a German version of the Strengthening Families Programme 10-14: A randomised controlled trial", European Journal of Public Health, 26(6), pp.953~959 (2016)[DOI]
- Moher D, "Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses : The PRISMA statement", PLoS Medicine, 6(7), pp.e1000097~ (2009)[DOI]
- Bornstein MH, "Social competence, externalizing, and internalizing behavioral adjustment from early childhood through early adolescence : Developmental cascades", Development and Psychopathology, 22(4), pp.717~735 (2010)[DOI]
- "SIGN 50: A guideline developer's handbook" (2019)[URL]
- Higgins J, "Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions", pp.362~588 (2019), Wiley-Blackwell
- Egger M, "Bias in metaanalysis detected by a simple, graphical test", BMJ, 315(7109), pp.629~634 (1997)[DOI]
- Borenstein M, "Common mistakes in meta-analysis and how to avoid them", pp.13~41 (2019), Biostat Inc
- Thomas RE, "Effectiveness of school-based smoking prevention curricula : Systematic review and meta-analysis", BMJ Open, 5(3), pp.e006976~ (2015)[DOI]
- Thomas RE, "Family-based programmes for preventing smoking by children and adolescents", The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2, pp.CD004493~ (2015)[DOI]
- Agerup T, "Associations between parental attachment and course of depression between adolescence and young adulthood", Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 46(4), pp.632~642 (2015)[DOI]
- Myung SK, "Effects of web-and computer-based smoking cessation programs : Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials", Archives of Internal Medicine, 169(10), pp.929~937 (2009)[DOI]
- Hallinan MT, "Teacher influences on students' attachment to school", Sociology of Education, 81(3), pp.271~283 (2008)[DOI]