모빌리티 플랫폼 규제의 방향성 검토: 우버(Uber)와 타다(TADA) 사건을 중심으로
A Review of Regulatory Directions for Mobility Platforms: Focusing on the Uber and TADA Cases
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
국내 여객자동차 분야에서 모빌리티 혁신을 주도한 플랫폼 우버(Uber)와 타다(TADA)는 기존 산업 질서와의 갈등과 법적 규제에 직면하면서 좌초되었다. AI 시대의 패러다임 변혁기에서 디지털 주권(Digital Sovereignty)과 국내 모빌리티 산업을 수호하고 미래 도약을 위해서 향후 모빌리티 정책은 ‘C.A.S.E’로 상징되는 모빌리티 서비스(MaaS) 시장에 선제적으로 대응하여야 할 것이며, 모빌리티에 대한 규제와 입법은 특정 ‘시장 내 경쟁자(Competitor)’ 보호가 아닌 글로벌 ‘시장개척 경쟁(competition for the market)’을 촉진할 수 있는 혁신적 제도설계에 집중되어야 할 것이다.
Abstract
In the domestic passenger car sector, mobility platforms such as Uber and TADA, which led innovation, have faced setbacks due to conflicts with existing industry structures and legal regulations. As we enter an era of paradigm shifts driven by AI, future mobility policies must proactively respond to the Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) market, symbolized by the acronym ‘C.A.S.E.’ (Connected, Autonomous, Shared, Electric), in order to protect digital sovereignty and safeguard the domestic mobility industry while positioning it for future growth. Regulation and legislation concerning mobility should focus not on protecting specific competitors within the market but on fostering innovative institutional designs that efficiently promote global ‘competition for the market’.
참고문헌 (27)
- 이혁, "대형마트 영업규제에 관한 연구", 상사법연구, 34(1), pp.1~30 (2015)
- 미래 교통수단과 서비스의 등장에 따른 교통시설 혁신방안, "한국교통연구원", 한국교통연구원, ~ (2020)
- 한진희, "진입ㆍ퇴출의 창조적 파괴과정과 총요소생산성 증가에 대한 실증분석", 한국개발연구, 25(2), pp.1~30 (2003)
- KITA, "美 정보기술혁신재단(ITIF):미국의 디지털 경제전략 권고안", 한국무역협회, ~ (2021)
- PwC Korea, "모빌리티 서비스 시장의미래 M.I.L.E", PwC Korea, ~ (2023)
- Aghion, P., "A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction", Econometrica, 60(2), pp.323~351 (1992)
- Aghion, P., "A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica LX, RG King and R. Levine", Finance, entrepreneurship and growth, 541, pp.323~351 (1992)
- Christensen, C. M., "The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail" (1997), Harvard Business Review Press
- DaSilva, C. M., "Disruptive Technologies and Business Models", Technovation, 98, pp.102125~ (2020)
- Farber, D. A., "Law and public choice : a critical introduction", pp.23~ (1991), University of Chicago Press
- Fitzgerald, M., "Embracing Digital Technology : A New Strategic Imperative", MIT Sloan Management Review, 55(2) (2013)
- Foster, R., "Creative Destruction:Why Companies That Are Built to Last Underperform the Market: And How to Successfully Transform Them" (2001), Currency
- Geels, F. W., "The Socio-Technical Transitions of Electric Mobility in Europe:A Multi-Level Perspective", Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 10(3), pp.509~526 (2017)
- Jason Furman, "Unlocking Digital Competition, Report of the Digital Competition Expert Panel", HM Treasury (2019)
- Leonard-Barton, D., "Implementation as Mutual Adaptation of Technology and Organization", Research Policy, 17(5) (1988)
- Levine, A., "Serverless Platforms and Applications: A Deep Dive into PaaS and FaaS" (2019), O’Reilly Media
- Matt, C., "Digital Transformation Strategies", Business &Information Systems Engineering, 57(5), pp.339~343 (2015)
- Rogers, E. M., "Diffusion of Innovations" (2003), Free Press
- Rosenow, J., "The invisible success story : Understanding the role of policy in enabling the heat pump market in Europe", Energy Policy, 146, pp.111812~ (2020)
- Schumpeter, J. A., "Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy" (1942), Harper & Brothers
- Smith, A., "The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions", Research Policy, 34(10), pp.1491~1510 (2005)
- Van Alstyne, M. W., "Pipelines, Platforms, and the New Rules of Strategy", Harvard Business Review, 94(4), pp.54~62 (2016)
- Vial, G., "Understanding digital transformation : A review and a research agenda", The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), pp.118~144 (2019)
- "대법원 2023. 6. 1 선고 2022도13414 판결", ~ (2023)
- "서울중앙지방법원 2022. 9. 29 선고 2020노 845 판결", ~ (2022)
- "서울중앙지방법원 2020. 2. 19 선고 2019고단7006 판결", ~ (2020)
- "헌법재판소 2021. 6. 24. 2020헌마651", ~ (2021)