한국에서 수사와 내사 범위와 한계
Distinction between Preliminary Investigation and Formal Investigation in Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
There is no legal basis to classify preliminary investigation from formal investigation in Korea. But preliminary investigation is defined as a secret investigation of crime by the police or the prosecutor, which is not open to the public and may be terminated by closure of preliminary investigation or commencement of formal investigation. Actually so many police officers and prosecutors widely use preliminary investigation as a tool to detect crime and/or criminal without legal restraint attached to formal investigation by the criminal procedure law. For example, the subject of preliminary investigation has to go to the police station or the prosecutors' office in the name of "voluntary accompany". And investigators often request the subject of preliminary investigation to produce so-called "self protocol" relating suspicion of crime. Besides lots of search and seizure without warrant are employed by way of consent or emergency exception. These methods of preliminary investigation might infringe the fundamental rights of the subject and violate the principle of due-process. In order to prevent investigation agency from abusing its power, especially illegally administering compulsory measures to the citizens, the methods of preliminary investigation should be restricted to more narrow range such as questioning without any enforcement,gathering information from voluntary informant, and so on. Although the concept of preliminary investigation cannot be eliminated, its limit shall be maintained strictly. In this context it is necessary to insert the new provision on preliminary investigation in the criminal procedure law as follows. The Criminal Procedure Law, Article 199 ③ Before commencing formal investigation, the officer of investigation agency may carry out preliminary investigation based on voluntary consent of the subject such as questioning,gathering, and researching information relating to the crime.
Abstract
There is no legal basis to classify preliminary investigation from formal investigation in Korea. But preliminary investigation is defined as a secret investigation of crime by the police or the prosecutor, which is not open to the public and may be terminated by closure of preliminary investigation or commencement of formal investigation. Actually so many police officers and prosecutors widely use preliminary investigation as a tool to detect crime and/or criminal without legal restraint attached to formal investigation by the criminal procedure law. For example, the subject of preliminary investigation has to go to the police station or the prosecutors' office in the name of "voluntary accompany". And investigators often request the subject of preliminary investigation to produce so-called "self protocol" relating suspicion of crime. Besides lots of search and seizure without warrant are employed by way of consent or emergency exception. These methods of preliminary investigation might infringe the fundamental rights of the subject and violate the principle of due-process. In order to prevent investigation agency from abusing its power, especially illegally administering compulsory measures to the citizens, the methods of preliminary investigation should be restricted to more narrow range such as questioning without any enforcement,gathering information from voluntary informant, and so on. Although the concept of preliminary investigation cannot be eliminated, its limit shall be maintained strictly. In this context it is necessary to insert the new provision on preliminary investigation in the criminal procedure law as follows. The Criminal Procedure Law, Article 199 ③ Before commencing formal investigation, the officer of investigation agency may carry out preliminary investigation based on voluntary consent of the subject such as questioning,gathering, and researching information relating to the crime.
참고문헌 (25)
- 강동욱, "형사절차상 내사의 의의와 한계", 한양법학, 23(2), pp.11~31 (2012), 한양법학회[DOI]
- 강석구, "내사에 관한 연구"
- 권오걸, "수사절차로서의 내사에 대한 고찰", 형사법연구, 15 (2001), 한국형사법학회
- 김재덕, "내사의 허용범위와 통제방안", 법학논집, 16(1), pp.265~289 (2011), 법학연구소
- 백형구, "형사소송법강의" (2001), 박영사
- 손동권, "형사소송법" (2010)
- 신동운, "내사종결처분의 법적 성질", 서울대학교 법학, 45(3), pp.309~331 (2004), 법학연구소
- 신동운, "신형사소송법, 제4판"
- 신양균, "내사의 개념과 허용범위", 형사법연구, 23(3), pp.181~206 (2011), 한국형사법학회
- 오경식, "내사와 수사의 구별 기준에 대한 고찰 - 대법원 2001. 10. 26. 선고 2000도2968 판결을 중심으로-", 형사법의 신동향, (34), pp.48~85 (2012), 대검찰청
- 이동환, "형사절차상 '내사'와 경찰작용상 '수사전 처분'", 석사, 경찰법학, pp.2008
- 이은모, "형사소송법" (2010)
- 정동욱, "수사와 출국", 경영법무, 통권 : 87 (2001), 한국경영법무연구소
- 정성진, "내사론", 법조, 46(3) (1997), 법조협회
- 정웅석, "내사사건의 통제방안에 관한 연구", 형사정책, 20(1), pp.279~300 (2008), 한국형사정책학회
- 조광훈, "내사절차에서 피내사자의 인권보호에 관한 연구", 법학연구, 19(2), pp.299~357 (2009), 법학연구원
- 최창민, "내사와 수사지휘", 2012년 영남형사판례연구회에서 발표한 미발표논문, ~ (2012)
- 허인석, "내사의 법적 쟁점에 관한 연구 형사법의 쟁점연구 Ⅱ" (2010), 박영사
- "헌재 1990. 12. 26. 선고 89헌마277결정", ~ (1990)
- "대법원 1996. 6. 3. 선고 96모18판결", ~ (1996)
- "대법원 1979. 6. 12. 선고 79도792판결", ~ (1979)
- "대법원 1991. 11. 5. 선고 91모68판결", ~ (1991)
- "대법원 2006. 12. 7. 선고 2004다14932판결", ~ (2006)
