论我国国际私法理论和实务中的误区
On the Erroneous Zones in the Theory and Practice of the Private International Law of Our Country
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The principle of state sovereignty is the paramount principle of the Chinese private international law, the parties can only choose the facultative rules, the parties of all civil and commercial cases with foreign elements can choose by agreement the Chinese law as the applicable law, the law governing contracts chosen by the parties must not evade the mandatory rules of the Chinese law,these are all influential opinions in the theories as well as the judicial practice of the Chinese private international law, however,they are in fact erroneous zones in the Chinese private international law. It needs hard work of people from many different walks of life to clear up these erroneous zones in order to further improve the private international law of our country, and the Chinese scholars of the private international law are duty‐bound to finish this task.
Abstract
The principle of state sovereignty is the paramount principle of the Chinese private international law, the parties can only choose the facultative rules, the parties of all civil and commercial cases with foreign elements can choose by agreement the Chinese law as the applicable law, the law governing contracts chosen by the parties must not evade the mandatory rules of the Chinese law,these are all influential opinions in the theories as well as the judicial practice of the Chinese private international law, however,they are in fact erroneous zones in the Chinese private international law. It needs hard work of people from many different walks of life to clear up these erroneous zones in order to further improve the private international law of our country, and the Chinese scholars of the private international law are duty‐bound to finish this task.
참고문헌 (24)
- 郭玉军, "从统计分析看我国涉外民商事审判实践的发展", 载《中国国际私法和比较法年刊》, 11 (2008)
- 屈广清, "冲突法原理" (2004), 法律出版社
- "四川省高级人民法院民事判决书（2004）川民终字第162号", ~ (2004)
- "上海市高级人民法院民事判决书（2003）沪高民四（海）终字第133号", ~ (2003)
- 徐青森, "国际私法案例分析" (2009), 中国人民大学出版社
- "广东省高级人民法院民事判决书（2004）粤高法民四终字第2号", ~ (2004)
- "广东省高级人民法院民事判决书（2004）粤高法民四终字第53号", ~ (2004)
- "中华人民共和国四川省成都市中级人民法院民事判决书（2005）成民初字第850号", ~ (2005)
- "中华人民共和国最高人民法院民事判决书(2002)民四终字第6号", ~ (2002)
- "天津市高级人民法院民事判决书（2003）津高民四终字第87号", ~ (2003)
- "最高人民法院民事判决书（2001）民四终字第16号", ~ (2001)
- "最高人民法院民事判决书（2004）民四终字第21号", ~ (2004)
- "最高人民法院民事判决书（2005）民四终字第7号", ~ (2005)
- 参见李双元, "中国国际私法通论" (2003), 法律出版社
- 参见章尚锦, "国际私法" (2005), 中国人民大学出版社
- 参见秦瑞亭, "中国合同冲突法的理论与实践", The Journal of Chinese studies, 5 (2008)
- 参见秦瑞亭, "冲突法的理论与实务" (2007), 对外经济贸易大学出版社
- 详见秦瑞亭, "冲突法的理论与实务" (2007), 对外经济贸易大学出版社
- 详见秦瑞亭, "国际私法" (2008), 南开大学出版社
- "载于北大法宝, vip.chinalawinfo.com，2009年8月28日访问。", ~ (2009)
- 黄进, "2007年中国国际私法司法实践述评. in: 中国国际私法与比较法年刊" (2008), 北京大学出版社
- Frank Vischer, "10 Jahre IPR unter besonderer Beruecksichtigung des Internationalen Schuldrechts. in: Private Law in the International Arena" (2000), T.M.C. Asser Press
- Gabriele Scherer, "Das Internationale Privatrecht als globales system" (2005), Dissertation der Humboldt‐Universitaet zu Berlin
- Thomas G. Guedj, "The Theory of the Lois de Police, A Functional Trend in Continental Private International Law‐A Comparative Analysis with Modern American Theories", The American Journal of Comparative Law, 39(4) (1991)