본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

건설도급계약상의 위험부담의 분배

A study on the Distribution of Risk in Construction Contract

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The contract for work that has the nature of a bilateral contract occurs a problem of the risk. The problems of liability for risk are the payment of remuneration and the apportionment of a loss when contractor's work is impossibility of performance by his burdenless reason in a construction contract. The contractor shall bear the risk caused by indeterminate elements because the obligations of contracts is to complete the work. But it is too harsh for the contractor to bear the risk unilaterally in disregard of the distinctiveness of construction work. And when the obligation to accomplish a work is able to compete with partial inability, the burden of risk for increasing expense is discussed. According to case law and theory, before deliver a work over to a person who ordered any work after complete it, the risk has been burdened by the debtor. But considering the characteristics of debt in contract for any construction work, this explanation is not convincing. Because it is difficult to make all kinds of risk elements forecast when the interested parties signed construction contract. And this is supplemented by several types of construction work standardized contract. In Germany,the risk distributions are specified by the established risk domain. The risk of contract for any construction work is distributed to the parties on the basis of the origin of the various risks appeared in several causes depending on the conditions of the contract. Therefore, we need to be considered with the variety of risk factors that affect impossibility of performance, the time required for the fulfillment and risk factors arising from person who ordered any work in the distribution of risk. The risk of construction contract should be distributed with taking account of what the risk have occurred from any cause in performing the construction contract. And we should give shape to the risk distribution of construction contract as the German civil code and the stance of a risk domain theory.

Abstract

The contract for work that has the nature of a bilateral contract occurs a problem of the risk. The problems of liability for risk are the payment of remuneration and the apportionment of a loss when contractor's work is impossibility of performance by his burdenless reason in a construction contract. The contractor shall bear the risk caused by indeterminate elements because the obligations of contracts is to complete the work. But it is too harsh for the contractor to bear the risk unilaterally in disregard of the distinctiveness of construction work. And when the obligation to accomplish a work is able to compete with partial inability, the burden of risk for increasing expense is discussed. According to case law and theory, before deliver a work over to a person who ordered any work after complete it, the risk has been burdened by the debtor. But considering the characteristics of debt in contract for any construction work, this explanation is not convincing. Because it is difficult to make all kinds of risk elements forecast when the interested parties signed construction contract. And this is supplemented by several types of construction work standardized contract. In Germany,the risk distributions are specified by the established risk domain. The risk of contract for any construction work is distributed to the parties on the basis of the origin of the various risks appeared in several causes depending on the conditions of the contract. Therefore, we need to be considered with the variety of risk factors that affect impossibility of performance, the time required for the fulfillment and risk factors arising from person who ordered any work in the distribution of risk. The risk of construction contract should be distributed with taking account of what the risk have occurred from any cause in performing the construction contract. And we should give shape to the risk distribution of construction contract as the German civil code and the stance of a risk domain theory.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. 곽윤직, "채권각론" (2007), 박영사
  2. 김준호, "민법강의" (2013), 법문사
  3. 김형배, "민법학강의(제10판)" (2011), 신조사(서울)
  4. 이은영, "채권각론" (2007), 박영사
  5. 지원림, "민법강의" (2008), 홍문사
  6. 김동훈, "위험부담의 법리와 신의칙", 고시연구 (2004), 고시연구사
  7. 임삼섭, "도급에 관한 연구", 박사, 법학, pp.2000
  8. 정광수, "도급계약에 있어서의 위험부담", 사회과학연구, 31 (1991), 강원대학교
  9. 제철웅, "매매에서의 위험부담", 민사법학, (26), pp.353~389 (2004), 한국민사법학회
  10. 최수정, "민법 제537조의 해석과 매매에서의 위험분배", 민사법학, (20) (2001), 한국민사법학회
  11. 현소혜, "독일 건설도급의 현황과 쟁점", 홍익법학, 11(1), pp.27~55 (2010), 법학연구소
  12. F. Nassauer, ""Sphärentheorien" zu Regelungen der Gefahrtragungshaftung, in vertraglichen Schuldverhältnissen" (1978)
  13. H.Brox, "Besonderes Schuldrecht" (2008)
  14. J. Oechsler, "Schuldrecht Besonder Teil" (2003)
  15. Vgl. Fabricius, "Leistungsstörungen im Arbeitsverhältnis" (1970)
  16. W. Fikentscher, "Schuldrecht" (2006)
  17. 我妻榮, "債權各論 中卷2(民法講義V3)" (1962), 岩波書店
  18. 岩崎脩, "改訂增補 建設工事請負契約の硏究" (1993), 淸文社
  19. 廣中俊雄, "債權各論講義" (1994), 有斐閣
  20. 小野秀誠, "危險負擔の硏究" (1995), 日本評論社
  21. 谷口知平, "新版註釋民法(13)" (1996), 有斐閣
  22. 栗田哲男, "現代民法硏究(1)" (1997), 信山社
  23. 山本敬三, "民法講義Ⅳ-1 契約" (2005), 有悲閣
  24. 潮見佳男, "基本講義債權各論Ⅰ" (2009), 新世社
  25. 森田修, "契約責任の法學的 構造" (2006), 有斐閣
  26. 內田貴, "民法Ⅱ 債權各論" (2007), 東京大學出版部
  27. 笠井修, "建設請負契大本俊彦․小林潔司․若公崇敏, “建設請負契約におけるリスク分擔”,「土木學 會論文集」, No 693, 日本土木學會, 2001約のリスクと歸責" (2009), 日本評論社

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)