본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

中国法上港口经营人法律地位之研究

A Study on the Legal Status of Port Operators under Chinese Law

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

在海上货物运输过程中, 对于因港口经营人的原因造成货物的灭失、 损毁, 存在着如何确定其 赔偿责任, 以及能否援引承运人的抗辩事由或者责任限制条款的问题。 由于目前中国法律上没有明 确规定, 在理论和实务上往往需要先确定港口经营人的法律地位。 本文围绕中国港口经营人的法律地位, 从中国立法的演变历程、 中国学界的理论学说和司法 实践中的裁判观点这三个方面展开分析研究。 在立法层面, 自2016年相关的部门规章被废止以后, 中国法上已没有关于港口经营人的法律地位和法律责任的明确规定。 在理论层面, 中国学术界基于 中国《海商法》和其他域外法的有关规定, 围绕港口经营人的法律地位形成了诸多不同观点。 在司法 层面, 由于缺乏明确规定, 中国法院在裁决这类纠纷时, 往往需要结合具体案情对港口经营人的法 律地位进行法律解释, 以判断是否适用《海商法》或是一般民事法律规定, 进而产生了多种不同类型 的判决结果。 2020年中国《海商法(送审稿)》公布, 规定了港口经营人的定义, 并明确了港口经营人享有承运 人的抗辩事由和限制赔偿责任权利。 但并未明确港口经营人的法律地位以及与承运人的责任分担 方式, 港口经营人责任承担缺乏理论上的依据和法律适用上的明确性。 应当以此次《海商法》修改为 契机, 明确港口经营人是“承运人的履行辅助人”的法律地位, 并据此对《海商法(送审稿)》中的有关 规定作补充完善。 如此,可以统一港口经营人法律地位的理论基础, 明确其与承运人的责任承担方 式, 实现货方、 港方和船方之间的利益平衡。

Abstract

In the carriage of goods by sea, regarding the loss of or damage to the goods caused by the port operator, there is the question of how to determine its liability and whether the carrier's defences or limitation of liability clauses can be invoked. In theory and practice, it is often necessary to first determine the legal status of the port operator, as there are currently no explicit provisions in Chinese law. This article analyses and discusses the legal status of port operators in China from three aspects: the evolution of Chinese legislation, the theoretical views of Chinese academics and the judgments of Chinese courts, with the following findings: ① At the legislative aspect, since the repeal of the relevant Government Departmental Regulations in 2016, there are no explicit provisions on port operators in Chinese law. ②At the theoretical aspect, Chinese scholars have developed various views on the legal status of port operators based on the relevant provisions of China's Maritime Law and other international legislation. ③ At the judicial aspect, in the absence of specific regulations, Chinese courts have often required legal interpretation of the legal status of the port operator considering the specific circumstances of the case to determine whether the provisions of the Maritime Law or general civil law apply when deciding such disputes,which has resulted in different types of judgments in practice. In 2020, China's Maritime Law (Draft for Examination) was published, which provides a definition of port operator and specifies that the carrier's defences and limitation of liability can be invoked. However, the legal status of the port operator and the manner of division of liability with the carrier were not specified; thus a theoretical foundation and legal clarity in the application of the law is lacking regarding the assumption of liability by the port operator.This amendment should be used as an opportunity to identifying the legal status of the port operator as Contractual Assistants of the carrier, which will not only unify the theoretical foundation of the port operator's legal status, but also facilitate the clarification of its liability with that of the carrier. Therefore, a balance of interests between the cargo sid e, the port sid e and the ship sid e can be achieved.

참고문헌 (39)

  1. 韩世远, "合同法总论" (2018), 法律出版社
  2. 韩立新, "各国(地区)海商法汇编(中英文对照)" (2003), 大连海事大学出版社
  3. 黄薇主编, "中华人民共和国民法典合同编释义" (2020), 法律出版社
  4. 李凤英, "港口生产组织" (2013), 人民交通出版社
  5. 李璐玲, "海上货物运输中港口经营人法律责任研究" (2013), 中国政法大学出版社
  6. 王泽鉴, (2015), 北京大学出版社
  7. 薛波主, "元照英美法辞典" (2003), 法律出版社
  8. 叶红军, "港口法解析" (2003), 人民交通出版社、 大连海事出版社
  9. 郑玉波, "民法债权总论" (1996), 三民书局
  10. 陈诗婷, "港口经营人法律地位的判例探析", 载《中国海商法研究》, 32(2) (2021)
  11. 傅廷中, "论港口经营人在国际贸易运输中的法律地位", 载《清华法学》, (5) (2008)
  12. 傅志军, "港口经营人法律地位浅析", 载《珠江水运》, (6) (2009)
  13. 耿新颖, "港口经营人在海上货物运输中的法律地位", 载《中国海事》, (3) (2006)
  14. 郭萍, "《鹿特丹规则》对中国港口经营人法律地位确定之影响", 载《大连海事大学学报(社会科学版)》, 11(4) (2012)
  15. 韩立新, "《鹿特丹规则》对港口经营人的影响", 载《中国海商法年刊》, 21(1) (2010)
  16. 胡正良, "港口经营人赔偿责任限制问题之研究", 2007年海商法国际研讨会论文集
  17. 蒋跃川, "在中国《海商法》中引入“海运履约方”制度的若干问题论析", 载《甘肃政法学院学报》, (5) (2011)
  18. 李璐玲, "《鹿特丹规则》对我国港口经营人的影响", 载《法学杂志》, (1) (2013)
  19. 刘冰, "柳强: “试析港口经营人在海上货物运输中的法律地位", 载《中国水运》, (1) (2007)
  20. 刘楠, "承运人之履行辅助人责任问题研究", 载《甘肃社会科学》, (2) (2015)
  21. 马炎秋, "中韩港口经营人责任限制制度比较研究", 载《大连理工大学学报(社会科学版)》, (3) (2015)
  22. 司玉琢, "中国海商法下港口经营人的法律地位", 载《昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版)》, (5) (2007)
  23. 王尽国, "《海商法》修改热点方向:港口经营人的法律规制", 中国船检 (2021)
  24. 夏元军, "海上货物运输法中"承运人的代理人"之真实身份考察", 载《中国海商法年刊》, 22(3) (2011)
  25. 向力, "析海上货物运输中港口经营人与承运人的法律关系", 2007年海商法国际研讨会论文集
  26. 袁绍春, "港口经营人的法律地位", 2007年海商法国际研讨会论文集
  27. 朱家麟, "论港口经营人的法律地位", 载《水运管理》, (8) (2000)
  28. "2021年交通运输行业发展统计公报"[URL]
  29. "交通运输部关于《中华人民共和国海商法(修订征求意见稿) 》公开征求意见的通知"[URL]
  30. "交通运输部《海商法》修订专家座谈会的总结"[URL]
  31. "在中国海商法协会修改《海商法》座谈会上的书面发言"[URL]
  32. "中国裁判文书网"[URL]
  33. "中华人民共和国交通运输部令(2016年第57号)交通运输部关于废止20件交通运输规章的决定_2016年第28号国务院公报_中国政府网"[URL]
  34. "《联合国大会第63届会会决议》《Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 11 December2008》(A/RES/63/122)"[URL]
  35. "《货规》和《港规》被废止对国内航运有何影响?|航运界"[URL]
  36. Brayan A. Garner, "Black’s law Dictionary" (2009), Thomson Reuters
  37. Chuah J., "Impact of the Rotterdam Rules on the Himalaya Clause-The Port Terminal Operator's Case" (2010), Informa
  38. Tetley w., "Scope of Coverage under the UNCITRAL", Draft Instrument, Journal of International Maritime Law (2004)
  39. "Restatement(Second), Agency§2(3) (1958)", ~ (1958)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)