소아암 치료 종료 후 청소년의 사회적응 자가 보고 설문지의측정 속성: 체계적 문헌고찰
Measurement Properties of Self-Report Questionnaires Measuring the Social Adjustment for Youth after Treatment of Childhood Cancer: Systematic Review
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate measurement properties of self-report questionnaires measuring the social adjustment for youth after treatment of childhood cancer. Methods: Social adjustment measurement tools were identified through a two-stage systematic review. First, we searched for articles using self-report questionnaires to measure the social adjustment of youth after the treatment of childhood cancer. The appropriate tools were listed and categorized. Second, using methodological filters, we searched 5 electronic databases for articles examining the measurement properties of the tools when used with youth after the treatment of childhood cancer. The quality of these papers was then evaluated using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. Results: Eight tools were frequently used to measure social adjustment. Eight studies investigated the measurement properties of 4 of these tools. The PedsQL 4.0 and MMQL-AF had moderate to strong evidence in some domains, but the rest of the domains had a lack of evidence. The SF-36 and KIDSCREEN-27 were validated for only a few areas. Conclusion: We found a lack of evidence regarding the measurement properties of these tools. More research is required on the measurement properties of tools for use in this population.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate measurement properties of self-report questionnaires measuring the social adjustment for youth after treatment of childhood cancer. Methods: Social adjustment measurement tools were identified through a two-stage systematic review. First, we searched for articles using self-report questionnaires to measure the social adjustment of youth after the treatment of childhood cancer. The appropriate tools were listed and categorized. Second, using methodological filters, we searched 5 electronic databases for articles examining the measurement properties of the tools when used with youth after the treatment of childhood cancer. The quality of these papers was then evaluated using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. Results: Eight tools were frequently used to measure social adjustment. Eight studies investigated the measurement properties of 4 of these tools. The PedsQL 4.0 and MMQL-AF had moderate to strong evidence in some domains, but the rest of the domains had a lack of evidence. The SF-36 and KIDSCREEN-27 were validated for only a few areas. Conclusion: We found a lack of evidence regarding the measurement properties of these tools. More research is required on the measurement properties of tools for use in this population.
참고문헌 (30)
- Roberts RM, "Survivors of childhood cancer in South Australia attending a late-effects clinic: A descriptive report of psychological, cognitive, and academic lateeffects", Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 32(2), pp.152~166 (2014)[DOI]
- 한수연, "소아암 환자의 형제자매 중재에 관한 연구논문의 체계적 문헌고찰", Child Health Nursing Research, 23(3), pp.394~404 (2017), 한국아동간호학회[DOI]
- Chen CM, "Games of lives in surviving childhood brain tumors", Western Journal of Nursing Research, 30(4), pp.435~457 (2008)[DOI]
- Takei Y, "Psychosocial difficulties in adolescent and young adult survivors of childhood cancer", Pediatrics International, 57(2), pp.239~246 (2015)[DOI]
- Langeveld NE, "Quality of life in young adult survivors of childhood cancer", Supportive Care in Cancer, 10(8), pp.579~600 (2002)[DOI]
- Weissman MM, "The assessment of social adjustment. a review of techniques", Archives of General Psychiatry, 32(3), pp.357~365 (1975)[DOI]
- Cavell TA, "Social adjustment, social performance, and social skills: A tri-component model of social competence", Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 19(2), pp.111~122 (1990)[DOI]
- Eiser C, "Long term social adjustment after treatment for childhood cancer", Archives of Disease in Childhood, 70(1), pp.66~70 (1994)[DOI]
- Hocking MC, "Social competence in pediatric brain tumor survivors: Application of a model from social neuroscience and developmental psychology", Pediatric Blood & Cancer, 62(3), pp.375~384 (2015)[DOI]
- Havighurst RJ, "Developmental tasks and education", pp.43~82 (1972), Longman Inc
- 손선영, "혈액종양 청소년의 질병 경험", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 41(5), pp.603~612 (2011), 한국간호과학회
- 조은지, "청소년 암 생존자의 적응 경험과 사회적 지지망", Child Health Nursing Research, 23(2), pp.238~248 (2017), 한국아동간호학회[DOI]
- 오수미, "소아암 치료 종료 아동의 사회적응에 영향을 미치는 요인", Child Health Nursing Research, 19(3), pp.238~245 (2013), 한국아동간호학회[DOI]
- Fuemmeler BF, "Survivors of childhood brain tumors: Behavioral, emotional, and social adjustment", Clinical Psychology Review, 22(4), pp.547~585 (2002)[DOI]
- Punyko JA, "Physical impairment and social adaptation in adult survivors of childhood and adolescent rhabdomyosarcoma: A report from the childhood cancer survivors study", Psycho-Oncology, 16(1), pp.26~37 (2007)[DOI]
- Gerhardt CA, "Social and romantic outcomes in emerging adulthood among survivors of childhood cancer", The Journal of Adolescent Health, 40(5), pp.462.e9~462.e15 (2007)
- 이은현, "자가 보고형 질문지 측정 속성에 대한 평가: 국내 간호학술지에 게재된 논문을 중심으로", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 43(1), pp.50~58 (2013), 한국간호과학회
- [URL]
- Hanratty J, "Systematic review of the measurement properties of tools used to measure behaviour problems in young children with autism", PLoS ONE, 10(12), pp.e0144649~ (2015)[DOI]
- [URL]
- Moher D, "Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement", Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(10), pp.1006~1012 (2009)[DOI]
- Terwee CB, "Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments", Quality of Life Research, 18(8), pp.1115~1123 (2009)[DOI]
- Mokkink LB, "The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes", Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(7), pp.737~745 (2010)[DOI]
- Terwee CB, "Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: A scoring system for the COS MIN checklist", Quality of Life Research, 21(4), pp.651~657 (2012)[DOI]
- Christie D, "Adolescent development", BMJ, 330, pp.301~304 (2005)[DOI]
- Terwee CB, "Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires", Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), pp.34~42 (2007)[DOI]
- DeVon HA, "A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability", Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 39(2), pp.155~164 (2007)[DOI]
- [URL]
- Yang FM, "Item response theory for measurement validity", Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry, 26(3), pp.171~177 (2014)
- Kane RL, "Understanding health care outcomes research", pp.133~ (2006), Jones and Bartlett Publishers Inc
