청소년보호와 인터넷규제

Abstract

There is a general recognition of the high need for juvenile protection in Internet, so regulation legislations appeared in a variety of ways. The features are as follows. First, coherent application of regulation in each deliberative body is difficult because deliberation criteria are legislated as internal regulations. Second, decision process of Harmful Media to Youth works by stages and administrative rule. Thirdly, it is necessary to make a unified process among deliberation bodies. Lastly, the verification of the age of the adolescent is a way of identification on the internet. There are institutions on the liability of OSP. First, although internet game shutdown system is legally constitutional, it is also unconstitutional. It is against the principle of liability and the principle of equality in that game is premised as harmful and online service supplier of the harmful game should be responsible of it. Secondly, regarding regulation on Child Pornography, the responsibility of OSP is possibly violates the principle of legality and the principle of liability. Thirdly, Webhard Registration system has a problem in that it admits a regular. monitoring obligation. Moreover, juvenile protection as a major goal of internet protection appears as an excessive regulation. Therefore, a careful legislation is necessary.