본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

임상용 도박인지척도(GRCS-12)의 개발과 타당화: 임상표본

Development and Validation of the Clinical Version of the Gambling Related Cognitions Scale-12 in a Korean Clinical Sample

박은경|전영민|이정임
한국임상심리학회 (Korean Clinical Psychology Association)|2018.04|Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology|제37권 제1호|pp. 104-118|DOI https://doi.org/10.15842/kjcp.2018.37.1.009

0

조회

0

다운로드

10

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

validity타당도도박인지GRCS-12임상표본gambling cognitiongambling related cognitions scale-12clinical sample
주제분류심리과학

초록

본 연구는 도박인지척도(Gambling Related Cognitions Scale, GRCS)의 문항을 기반으로 임상표본에 최적화된 임상용 도박인지척도를 구성하여 그 타당도를 검증하는 데 목적이 있다. 연구대상자는 도박중독 치료를 받으러 온 2,420명(남성 97.1%)이었다. 이들을 무선적으로 두집단으로 나누어, 임상표본 1(1,237명)의 자료에 대해서는 단축형 도박인지척도 구성을 위하여 원형척도를 번안한 GRCS에 대한 문항분석과 탐색적 요인분석으로 단축형 도박인지척도를 구성하였고, 임상표본 2(1,183명)의 자료에 대해서는 단축형 도박인지척도에 대한 확인적요인분석 및 타당도 검증을 하였다. 임상표본 1의 자료에 대한 문항분석과 탐색적 요인분석을 통해 4요인(예측/해석, 도박기대, 통제착각, 도박중단무능) 12문항의 단축형 도박인지척도 GRCS 12를 구성하였다. 4개 요인은 전체 변량의 67.06%를 설명하였다. 임상표본 2를 대상으로 GRCS 12의 신뢰도와 타당도를 검증하였다. 확인적 요인분석 결과 12문항의 4요인구조는 전반적인 적합도가 양호하였으며, 각 하위척도의 내적 신뢰도는 .68–.72, 전체 문항의 신뢰도는 .80이었다. 또한 수렴 및 변별 타당도, 준거관련 및 예측 타당도와 변화민감도를 확인하였다. 끝으로 본 연구 결과를 토대로 연구의 의의와 제한점에 대해 논의하였다.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to construct the clinical version of the Gambling Related Cognition Scale (GRCS-12), which is based on Gambling Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS) and confirm its optimal validity for Korean clinical sample. A total of 2,420 problem/pathological gamblers (male 97.1%) seeking treatment for gambling disorder completed the GRCS. They were randomly divided into two groups. Item analysis and explanatory factor analysis (EFA) were performed on the data of group 1(1,237) to construct GRCS-12 and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed on the data of group 2 (1,183) and the validity of GRCS-12 was confirmed. Based on the results of item analysis and EFA on the data of group 1, GRCS-12 consisting of four factors (prediction/interpretation, gambling-related expectancies, illusion of control, and perceived inability to stop gambling) and twelve items was constructed for group 1. The four factors accounted for 67.06% of the total variance. Reliability and validity were confirmed using group 2. The CFA results indicated that the four factors had internal consistency ranging from 0.68 to 0.72, while the reliability of all twelve items was 0.80. Thus, GRCS-12 showed good convergent validity, discriminant validity, criterion-related and predictive validity, and sensitivity to change. The implications and limitations of the present study along with suggestions for future research have also been discussed.

참고문헌 (60)

  1. Arcan, K., "Adaptation study of the Turkish version of the Gambling-Related Cognitions Scale(GRCST)", Journal of Gambling Studies, 31, pp.211~224 (2015)
  2. Arrindell, W., "An empirical test ofthe utility ofthe observations-to-variables ratios in factor and component analysis", Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, pp.165~178 (1985)
  3. Bentler, P. M., "Comparative fit indexes in structural models", Psychological Bulletin, 107, pp.238~246 (1990)
  4. Blaszczynski, A., "A pathways model of problem and pathological gambling", Addiction, 97, pp.487~499 (2002)
  5. Brown, M. W., "Testing structural equation models", pp.136~162 (1993), Sage
  6. Cattell, R. B., "The scree test for the number of factors", Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, pp.245~276 (1966)
  7. Chun, K. K., "Integrated Adaptation of CES-D in Korea", The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 6, pp.59~76 (2001)
  8. Chun, Y. M., "Factor structure of the Gambling Urge Scale", Poster presented at the 2012 Korean Addiction Psychological Association Seasonal Conference (2012)
  9. Chun, Y. M., "Factor structure of the Korean version of the GRCS", Paper presented at the 2012 Korean Addiction Psychological Association Seasonal Conference (2012)
  10. Chungnam University., "National survey on gambling industry users" (2010), National Gambling Control Commission
  11. Cohen, J., "Statistical power analysis for the behavior sciences" (1988), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  12. Costello, A. B., "Best practices in exploratory factor analysis : Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis", Practical Assessment Research and Evaluation, 10, pp.1~9 (2005)
  13. Donati, M. A., "Psychometric properties of the Gambling Related Cognitions Scale(GRCS)in young Italian gamblers", Addictive Behaviors, 45, pp.1~7 (2015)
  14. The Canadian Problem Gambling Index: Final Report, "Ferris, J.", Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse, ~ (2001)
  15. Fortune, E. E., "Cognitive distortions as a component and treatment focus of pathological gambling : a review", Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 26, pp.298~310 (2012)
  16. Gaboury, A., "Erroneous perceptions and gambling", Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 4, pp.411~420 (1989)
  17. Goodie, S. A., "Measuring cognitive distorions in pathological gambling : Review and meta-analyses", Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 27, pp.730~743 (2013)
  18. Grall-Bronnec, M., "A French adaptation of the Gambling-Related Cognitions Scale(GRCS) : A useful tool for assessment of irrational thoughts among gamblers", Journal of Gambling Issues, 27, pp.1~21 (2012)
  19. Hayton, J. C., "Factor retention decisions in exploratiory factor analysis : A tutorial on parallel analysis", Organizational Research Methods, 7, pp.191~205 (2004)
  20. Hong, S. H., "The criteria for selecting appropriate fit indices in structural equation modeling and their rationales", Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 19, pp.161~177 (2000)
  21. Horn, J. L., "A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis", Psychometrika, 30, pp.179~185 (1965)
  22. Hu, L., "Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives", Structural Equation Modeling, 6, pp.1~55 (1999)
  23. Iliceto, P., "Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Gambling Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS-I)", Journal of Gambling Studies, 31, pp.225~242 (2015)
  24. Joukhador, J., "Differences in cognitive distortions between problem and social gambler", Psychological Reports, 92, pp.1203~1214 (2003)
  25. Kass, R., "Factor analysis", Journal of Leisure Research, 11, pp.120~138 (1979)
  26. 김청택, "탐색적 요인분석의 오․남용 문제와 교정", 조사연구, 17(1), pp.1~29 (2016), 한국조사연구학회[DOI]
  27. Kline, R. B., "An easy guide to factor analysis" (1994), Routledge
  28. Kline, R. E., "Principles and practice of structural equations modelling" (2011), Guilford Press
  29. Ladouceur, R., "Cognitive treatment of pathological gambling", The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 189, pp.774~780 (2001)
  30. Langer, E. J., "Head I win, tails it's chance : The illusion of control as a function of the sequence of outcomes in a purely chance task", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, pp.951~955 (1975)
  31. 이흥표, "비합리적 도박신념이 병적 도박에 미치는 영향", Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 22(2), pp.415~434 (2003), 한국임상심리학회
  32. 이경희, "한국판 캐나다 문제도박척도(CPGI)의 타당화를 위한 예비연구", 한국심리학회지: 건강, 14(3), pp.667~675 (2009), 한국건강심리학회[DOI]
  33. Lesieur, H. R., "The South Oaks Gambling Screen(SOGS) : A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers", American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, pp.1184~1188 (1987)
  34. Levesque, D., "Gambling-Related Cognition Scale (GRCS): Are skills-based games at a disadvantage?", Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 31, pp.647~654 (2017)
  35. Mackillop, J., "Convergent validity of measures of cognitive distortions, impulsivity, and time perspective with pathological gambling", Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 20, pp.75~79 (2006)
  36. Myrseth, H., "Differences in cognitive distortions between pathological and non-pathological gamblers with preferences for chance or skill games", Journal of Gambling Studies, 26, pp.561~569 (2010)
  37. O'Connor, B. P., "SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number ofcomponents using parallel analysis and Velicer's MAPtest", Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 32, pp.396~402 (2000)
  38. Oei, T. P., "Validation of the Chinese version of the Gambling Related Cognitions Scale(GRCS-C)", Journal of Gambling Studies, 23, pp.309~322 (2007)
  39. Oei, T. P., "The Relationship Between Gambling Cognitions, Psychological States, and Gambling : A Cross-Cultural Study of Chinese and Caucasians in Australia", Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39, pp.147~161 (2008)
  40. Oei, T. P., "Cognitive and psychosocial variables predicting gambling behavior in a clinical sample", International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 13, pp.520~535 (2015)
  41. Radloff, L. S., "The CES-D scale : A self-report depression scale for research in the general population", Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, pp.385~401 (1977)
  42. Raylu, N., "Pathological gambling : A comprehensive review", Clinical Psychology Review, 22, pp.1009~1061 (2002)
  43. Raylu, N., "The Gambling Related Cognitions Scale(GRCS) : development, confirmatory factor validation and psychometric properties", Addiction, 99, pp.757~769 (2004)
  44. Raylu, N., "The gambling urge scale : development, confirmatory factor validation, and psychometric properties", Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18, pp.100~105 (2004)
  45. Raylu, N., "Role of culture in gambling and problem gambling", Clinical Psychology Review, 23, pp.1087~1114 (2004)
  46. Sharpe, L., "A reformulated cognitive-behavioral model of problem gambling : A biopsychosocial perspective", Clinical Psychology Review, 22, pp.1~25 (2002)
  47. Smith, D., "Exploring the measurement structure of the Gambling Related Cognitions Scale(GRCS)in treatment-seekers : A Bayesian structural equation modelling approach", Psychiatry Research, 237, pp.90~96 (2016)
  48. 손원숙, "심리검사 번안에 대한 통합적 접근", 한국심리학회지:일반, 22(2), pp.57~80 (2003), 한국심리학회
  49. Steenbergh, T. A., "Development and Validation of the Gamblers’ Beliefs Questionnaire", Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 16, pp.143~149 (2002)
  50. Tabachnick, B. G., "Using Multivariate Statistics" (2013), Pearson Education Inc
  51. Taylor, R. N., "Are gambling related cognitions in adolescence multidimensional? : Factor structure of the gambling related cognitions scale", Journal of Gambling Studies, 30, pp.453~465 (2013)
  52. Toneatto, T., "Cognitive psychopathology of problem gambling", Substance Use and Misuse, 34, pp.1593~1604 (1999)
  53. Toneatto, T., "Does the treatment of cognitive distortions improve clinical outcomes for problem gambling?", Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 39, pp.221~229 (2009)
  54. Toneatto, T., "Cognitive distortions in heavy gambling", Journal of Gambling Studies, 13, pp.253~266 (1997)
  55. Tucker, L. R., "A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis", Psychometrica, 38, pp.1~10 (1973)
  56. Whelan, J. P., "Problem and pathological gambling" (2007), Hogrefe & Huber
  57. Winfree, W. R., "Psychometric evaluation of the Gamblers’ Beliefs Questionnaire with treatment-seeking disordered gamblers", Addictive Behaviors, 43, pp.97~102 (2015)
  58. Winfree, W. R., "Validation of a Spanish translation of the Gamblers’ Beliefs Questionnaire", Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 27, pp.274~278 (2013)
  59. Xian, H., "Association of cognitive distortions with problem and pathological gambling in adult male twins", Psychiatry Research, 160, pp.300~307 (2008)
  60. Yokomitsu, K., "Development and validation of the Japanese version of the Gambling Related Cognitions Scale(GRCS-J)", Asian Journal of Gambling Issues and Public Health, 5, pp.1~11 (2015)

관련 논문AI추천

단축형 단도박 자기효능감척도(GASS-9)의 개발과 타당화전영민한국건강심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 건강2018 · 제23권 제4호한국판 도박 증상 척도(KG-SAS)의 신뢰도와 타당도권선중한국상담심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료2011 · 제23권 제4호한국판 도박 태도 및신념 척도(GABS)의 타당도이인혜한국건강심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 건강2005 · 제10권 제4호비합리적 도박신념이 병적 도박에 미치는 영향이흥표한국임상심리학회 · Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology2003 · 제22권 제2호한국형 도박행동 H척도의 개발: 고수준 도박자 대상의 연구용 척도권선중, 김교헌, 김세진, 김수진, 김인혜, 김종남, 이순묵, 이흥표, 최용성한국심리학회 · 한국심리학회지:일반2011 · 제30권 제4호치료효과 평가도구로서의 한국판 도박회복추적척도(GFS-K) 타당화박은경, 이정임, 전영민한국임상심리학회 · Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology2018 · 제37권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)

한국 임상심리학자의 종합심리검사에 대한 견해와 활용 실태엄정연, 최승원pp. 1-17한국 임상심리전문가의 역할과 활동: 2018년도 조사보고서권정혜pp. 4-12정신건강전문요원으로서의 임상심리학자의 현재와 미래이준석, 원성두, 최선, 배금예, 배대석pp. 13-23사회적 배척이 얼굴표정 정서 인식에 미치는 영향: 사회불안의 조절효과양재원, 최지수pp. 18-30한국과 미국의 정신건강서비스 체계 비교: 지역사회 현장에서 임상심리학자의 역할유득권, 이영호pp. 24-32
원문 보기