본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

의료법 쌍벌죄 규정에 대한 의료법리학적 문제제기

The Jurisprudential Point at Issue in the Provision of Dual Punishment in the “Medical Law” in Korea

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류의학일반

초록

The recently revised “Medical Law” in Korea gives rise to at least three questions. First, should doctors be subject to criminal punishment on the grounds that that the “Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act” has not been effective in regulating the circulation of medicine and medical supplies? Second, will the provision of dual punishment in the new law achieve the desired results? Third, will social justice and ethics be promoted through the threat of criminal punishment? In this article we address these questions and argue for the following claims: (1) that the provision of dual punishment in the new law is illegitimate from a jurisprudential point of view, (2) that the provision of dual punishment will impede medical progress, and (3) that the tyranny of the majority and the problem of procedure in lawmaking will hinder the establishment of political justice and respect for the rule of law in Korea. The overall view defended in this article is that doctors and professional medical organizations should be granted autonomy in developing codes of conduct and professional ethics to regulate and promote the practice of medicine in Korea.

Abstract

The recently revised “Medical Law” in Korea gives rise to at least three questions. First, should doctors be subject to criminal punishment on the grounds that that the “Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act” has not been effective in regulating the circulation of medicine and medical supplies? Second, will the provision of dual punishment in the new law achieve the desired results? Third, will social justice and ethics be promoted through the threat of criminal punishment? In this article we address these questions and argue for the following claims: (1) that the provision of dual punishment in the new law is illegitimate from a jurisprudential point of view, (2) that the provision of dual punishment will impede medical progress, and (3) that the tyranny of the majority and the problem of procedure in lawmaking will hinder the establishment of political justice and respect for the rule of law in Korea. The overall view defended in this article is that doctors and professional medical organizations should be granted autonomy in developing codes of conduct and professional ethics to regulate and promote the practice of medicine in Korea.

참고문헌 (5)

  1. 김민중, "의료분쟁의 법률지식", pp.14~ (2000), 청림출판
  2. 이상돈, "의료체계와 법", pp.236~243 (2000), 고려대학교출판부
  3. 이재상, "형법총론", pp.7~ (1988), 박영사
  4. 임종휘, "입법과정론(개정판)", pp.10~17 (2000), 박영사
  5. 하태영, "형사철학과 형사정책(형법학의 새로운 길)", pp.9~30 (2007), 법문사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)