Multi-Objective Design Optimization of Composite Stiffened Panel Using Response Surface Methodology
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to develop efficient composite laminates for buckling load enhancement, interlaminar shear stress minimization, and weight reduction. This goal is achieved through cover-skin lay-ups around skins and stiffeners, which amplify bending stiffness and defer delamination by means of effective stress distribution. The design problem is formulated as multi-objective optimization that maximizes buckling load capability while minimizing both maximum out-of-plane shear stress and panel weight. For efficient optimization, response surface methodology is employed for buckling load, two out-of-plane shear stresses, and panel weight with respect to one ply thickness, six fiber orientations of a skin, and four stiffener heights. Numerical results show that skin-covered composite stiffened panels can be devised for maximum buckling load and minimum interlaminar shear stresses under compressive load. In addition, the effects of different material properties are investigated and compared. The obtained results reveal that the composite stiffened panel with Kevlar material is the most effective design.
Abstract
This study aims to develop efficient composite laminates for buckling load enhancement, interlaminar shear stress minimization, and weight reduction. This goal is achieved through cover-skin lay-ups around skins and stiffeners, which amplify bending stiffness and defer delamination by means of effective stress distribution. The design problem is formulated as multi-objective optimization that maximizes buckling load capability while minimizing both maximum out-of-plane shear stress and panel weight. For efficient optimization, response surface methodology is employed for buckling load, two out-of-plane shear stresses, and panel weight with respect to one ply thickness, six fiber orientations of a skin, and four stiffener heights. Numerical results show that skin-covered composite stiffened panels can be devised for maximum buckling load and minimum interlaminar shear stresses under compressive load. In addition, the effects of different material properties are investigated and compared. The obtained results reveal that the composite stiffened panel with Kevlar material is the most effective design.
참고문헌 (27)
- Zhangming Wu, "Buckling Analysis and Optimization of Variable Angle Tow Composite Plates", Thin-Walled Structures, 60, pp.163172~ (2012)
- Zhangming Wu, "Post-buckling Optimization of Variable Angle Tow Composite Plates", Composite Structures, 103, pp.3442~ (2013)
- Rasoul Khandan, "Optimum Design of Fibre Orientation in Composite Laminate Plates for Out-Plane Stresses", Bournemouth University
- Orifici, A. C, "Compression and Post-buckling Damage Growth and Collapse Analysis of Flat Composite Stiffened Panels", Composite Science Technology, 68(1516), pp.315060~ (2008)
- Yap, J. W. H, "The Analysis of Skin-to-stiffener Debonding in Composite Aerospace Structures", Composite Structures, 57(14), pp.42535~ (2002)
- Mallela, U.K, "Thin Walled Structures, Vol. 44", pp.361~
- Gal, E, "Buckling Analysis of Composite Panels", Composite Structures, 73, pp.179185~ (2006)
- Luca Lanzi, "Post-buckling Optimization of Composite Stiffened Panels: Computations and Experiments", 20156 Milano, Italy, 10 January, ~ (2006)
- Luca Lanzi, "Post-buckling Optimization of Composite Stiffened Panels: Computations and Experiments", Composite Structures, 73, pp.208220~ (2006)
- C. Bisagni, "Post-buckling Optimization of Composite Stiffened Panels Using Neural Networks", Composite Structures, 58, pp.237247~ (2002)
- Rikards, R, "Surrogate Models for Optimum Design of Stiffened Composite Shells", Composite Structures, 63, pp.243251~ (2004)
- Rikards, R, "Surrogate Modeling in Design Optimization of Stiffened Composite Shells", Composite Structures, 73, pp.244251~ (2006)
- Venkata M.K. Akula, "Multiscale Reliability Analysis of a Composite Stiffened Panel", Dassault Systems Simulia Corp
- Y.B. Sudhir Sastry, "Buckling Analysis of Thin Wall Stiffened Composite Panels", Computational Materials Science (2014)
- Santanu Kumar Sahoo, "Static and Buckling Analysis of Laminated Sandwich Plates with Orthotropic Core Using FEM" (2013), Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology
- Stability Analysis of the Thin Concrete Walls of the Hangzhou Grand Theater, "Wu Zhehua", Zhejiang University, Department of Civil Engineering, ~
- Andre I. Khuri, "Response Surface Methodology", Advanced Review, Online Publications
- Young-Kyoun Kim, "Application of Response Surface Methodology to Robust Design of BLDC Motor", KIEE International Transactions on EMECS, 12B-2, pp.47~51 (2002)
- Weaver, P.M, "Approximate Analysis for Buckling of Compression Loaded Long Rectangular Plates with Flexural", twist Anisotropy, 2006, pp.462(2065), 5973~
- Qiao, P, "Local Buckling of Composite FRP Shapes by Discrete Plate Analysis", Journal of Structural Engineering, 127(3), pp.24555~ (2001)
- Kollar, L.P, "Local Buckling of Fiber Reinforced Plastic Composite Structural Members with Open and Closed Cross Sections", Journal of Structural Engineering, 129(11), pp.150313~ (2003)
- Mittelstedt, C, "Closed-form Buckling Analysis of Compressively Loaded Composite Plates Braced by Omega-stringers", Composite Structures, 88(3), pp.42435~ (2009)
- Williams, J.K, "Buckling Behavior and Structural Efficiency of Open Section Stiffened Composite Compression Panels", AIAA Journal, 14(11), pp.161826~ (1976)
- Broderick H. Coburn, "Buckling Analysis of Stiffened Variable Angle Tow Panel", composite Structures, 111, pp.259270~ (2014)
- Park, J. H, "Stacking Sequence Design of Composite Laminates for Maximum Strength Using Genetic Algorithms", Composite Structures, 52, pp.17~231 (2001)
- Andrew Watson, "Optimization of Post-buckled Stiffened Panels with Multiple Stiffener Sizes", the 48th AIAA Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference
- Jeff W.H. Yap, "The Analysis of Skin-to-stiffener Debonding in Composite Aerospace Structures", Composite Structures, 57, pp.425435~ (2002)