평생교육정책의 정부별 변천과정 탐색

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the transition process of lifelong education policy in Korea by government and to present the direction of lifelong education policy. To this end, the theoretical considerations on the lifelong education policy and the lifelong education system and the target period of consideration was limited from Kim Young-sam administration to the Moon Jae-in administration, and literature research was conducted mainly on domestic prior studies. In summary, first, the Kim Young-sam administration laid the policy basis for establishing a lifelong learning system by attempting for the first time autonomous education reform by the democratic government, such as establishing a foundation for lifelong learning and expanding support for the underprivileged. Second, the Kim Dae-jung administration laid the foundation for a lifelong learning city by placing human resource development as a support for lifelong education system and establishing a consumer-centered legal system. Third, the Roh Moo-hyun administration established the second basic plan and revised the Framework Act on Human Resource Development to establish a legal foundation. Fourth, the Lee Myung-bak administration promoted the lifelong learning account system and the lifelong learning-centered university, focusing on increasing the demand for learning and guaranteeing opportunities for competency development. Fifth, the Park Geun-hye administration built a variety of lifelong education fields with the core of establishing a national lifelong learning system in the age of 100. Sixth, the Moon Jae-in administration operates open online lectures and match-up courses with the basic direction of realizing a lifelong learning society where individuals and society grow together. Therefore, in order to revitalize the lifelong education policy along with the efforts of the previous government, the goal of lifelong education policy was suggested as follows. First, it is necessary to expand the budget for lifelong education policy projects. Second, the general administration and education administration should be unified. Third, it is necessary to expand the lifelong education policy in preparation for the future society. In addition, it is necessary to provide fair educational opportunities to resolve social polarization and provide legal and institutional measures for professionals in lifelong education. In addition, it is necessary to implement a systematic and concrete lifelong education policy that can expand the participation of all citizens without time and space limitations.