우연, 강박, 방법론적 습성과 긴장 :과학적 발견의 추동력
Serendipity, Compulsion, Methodological Habit, and Tension: Motivations for Scientific Discovery
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
While 'common' scientific discovery within a scientific community is made by the faithful acceptance of dominant analytic canons, significant or 'initial' discovery leading to the revolutionary shift in research programme is an outcome of strategic political action to break out of the existing knowledge-production governance network. Rational choice and 'methodological habit' of scientists to conform to the scientific hegemony, which guarantee scientific and non-scientific interests for collaborators, produce the inescapable 'essential tension' inducing the conscious effort of 'outlaw scientists' to search for a free and creative heuristic. History of science shows that the process of significant scientific discoveries, e. g., Issac Newton's discovery of the gravity and entailing construction of the Newtonian system of physics, was a conscious and strategic endeavor to gain political as well as socioeconomic patronage.
Abstract
While 'common' scientific discovery within a scientific community is made by the faithful acceptance of dominant analytic canons, significant or 'initial' discovery leading to the revolutionary shift in research programme is an outcome of strategic political action to break out of the existing knowledge-production governance network. Rational choice and 'methodological habit' of scientists to conform to the scientific hegemony, which guarantee scientific and non-scientific interests for collaborators, produce the inescapable 'essential tension' inducing the conscious effort of 'outlaw scientists' to search for a free and creative heuristic. History of science shows that the process of significant scientific discoveries, e. g., Issac Newton's discovery of the gravity and entailing construction of the Newtonian system of physics, was a conscious and strategic endeavor to gain political as well as socioeconomic patronage.
참고문헌 (19)
- "과학적 발견의 정치사회적 정당화 적실성의 족쇄와 방법론적 구속성", pp.295~310
- "신화와 성화: 과학방법론의 패권정치" (2001), 서울: 전예원
- "과학헤게모니의 정치적 영상 신뢰연구", pp.1~18
- "과학적 신뢰의 방법론적 가버넌스", pp.1~13
- "과학적 신념, 과학적 패권과 연구전통의 변환: 방법론적 성찰", 23(2), pp.1~13 (2006)
- "과학적 신념, 신뢰와 지식의 패러독스", pp.3~19
- "보편적 과학성의 허상 사회과학연구의 정치적 수렴성 세계지역연구논총", pp.71~87
- "Revolution in Science" (1985), Harvard University Press
- "Issac Newton's Papers and Leters on Natural Philosophy and Related Documents" (1978), Harvard University Press
- "Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice University of Chicago Pres" (1992)
- "방법론적 습성과 긴장 과학적 발견의 추동력 17" (1993)
- "Victims of Groupthink" (1972)
- "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions The University of Chicago Pres" (1970)
- "The University of Chicago Pres" (1977)
- "The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes" (1986), Cambridge University Pres
- "How Habits of Mind Govern Scientific Beliefs The University of Chicago Pres" (1993)
- "The Rationality of Scientific Revolutions Problems of Scientific Revolution Progres and Obstacles to Progres in Sciences" (1975)
- "Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge", (rmal science and its dangers) (1987), Cambridge University Press
- "In Defence of Interaction", k(wledge and the body-mind problem) (1994)