본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

사법방해죄의 입법화방안

A Study on the Legislation on Obstrution of Justice in Criminal Law

0

조회

0

다운로드

12

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Under circumstances mentioned above, there needs to consider the introduction of Obstruction of Justice, one of the discussed things, with a view to strengthen the strictness. After the impeachment of W. J. Clinton in 1998, charging the obstruction of justice, Korea started to be concerned about it. Sometimes, the celebrities are guilty in obstruction of justice and this can show a lot of interests to people. Actually, Korean Criminal Law has the rules on ‘Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties(Article 136)’, ‘Escape and Violation of Summoning Order(Article 145)’, ‘Special Escape(Article 146)’, ‘Helping Escape(Article 147)’, ‘Perjury, Malicious Perjury(Article 152)’, ‘Destruction of Evidence, etc. and Special Exception to Relatives(Article 155)’, ‘False Accusation(Article 156)’, and these statutes are essentially in the boundary of Obstruction of Justice. And there is a controversy on this subject that the possibility of punishment of ‘False Statement of Suspect and Witness’ and the possibility of punishment of ‘False Presentment’. There are some reasons about these facts. As long as the accused’s rights are guaranteed, they try to state false and hide the truth. For the Investigators, like the police and prosecutors, which take it a duty to find the suspects, sue the accused, find the truth and punish them, it is too hard in doing fact-finding that they have no choice but to focus the witness’ statement, even if how hard they try to tell the false. While Perjury shall be punished by the Criminal Law Article 152, false statement at investigation can not be punished. And there needs to adopt a mandatory investigation because a witness will not attend the investigation. ‘The Law Perversion’, which means perverting the laws that the subject of criminal justice should apply and execute legitimately, is included in obstruction of justice in ‘Abuse of Authority(Article 123)’, ‘Unlawful Arrest and Unlawful Confinement(Article 124)’, ‘Violence and Cruel Act(Article 125)’. As the accused can be a obstacles in criminal justice, the subject of criminal justice naturally be the same. So, the act of perversion of law need to be punished in fairness of criminal justice. Hereinafter, there will be the consideration about necessity of obstruction of justice, false statements for the fact-finding in criminal process, and the boundary of punishment, legislation’s style and so on.

Abstract

Under circumstances mentioned above, there needs to consider the introduction of Obstruction of Justice, one of the discussed things, with a view to strengthen the strictness. After the impeachment of W. J. Clinton in 1998, charging the obstruction of justice, Korea started to be concerned about it. Sometimes, the celebrities are guilty in obstruction of justice and this can show a lot of interests to people. Actually, Korean Criminal Law has the rules on ‘Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties(Article 136)’, ‘Escape and Violation of Summoning Order(Article 145)’, ‘Special Escape(Article 146)’, ‘Helping Escape(Article 147)’, ‘Perjury, Malicious Perjury(Article 152)’, ‘Destruction of Evidence, etc. and Special Exception to Relatives(Article 155)’, ‘False Accusation(Article 156)’, and these statutes are essentially in the boundary of Obstruction of Justice. And there is a controversy on this subject that the possibility of punishment of ‘False Statement of Suspect and Witness’ and the possibility of punishment of ‘False Presentment’. There are some reasons about these facts. As long as the accused’s rights are guaranteed, they try to state false and hide the truth. For the Investigators, like the police and prosecutors, which take it a duty to find the suspects, sue the accused, find the truth and punish them, it is too hard in doing fact-finding that they have no choice but to focus the witness’ statement, even if how hard they try to tell the false. While Perjury shall be punished by the Criminal Law Article 152, false statement at investigation can not be punished. And there needs to adopt a mandatory investigation because a witness will not attend the investigation. ‘The Law Perversion’, which means perverting the laws that the subject of criminal justice should apply and execute legitimately, is included in obstruction of justice in ‘Abuse of Authority(Article 123)’, ‘Unlawful Arrest and Unlawful Confinement(Article 124)’, ‘Violence and Cruel Act(Article 125)’. As the accused can be a obstacles in criminal justice, the subject of criminal justice naturally be the same. So, the act of perversion of law need to be punished in fairness of criminal justice. Hereinafter, there will be the consideration about necessity of obstruction of justice, false statements for the fact-finding in criminal process, and the boundary of punishment, legislation’s style and so on.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. 조동석, "허위진술죄의 도입 제안", 법조, (537), pp.155~ (2001), 법조협회
  2. "Black’s Law Dictionary, 8th ed", pp.1107~ (2004)
  3. K. P .S. Prabhu, "OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE", American Criminal Law Review, pp.874~ (2003)
  4. 박미숙, "미국의 사법방해죄에 관한 연구", 한국형사정책연구원, 21~ (1999)
  5. "Model Penal Code Commentaries(Part Ⅱ)", The American Law Institute, 204~ (1980)
  6. 이덕연, "법관의 법왜곡문제, In 법과 사회 제12권", pp.263~ (1995), 법과사회이론학회
  7. 전지연, "법왜곡죄의 도입을 위한 시론", 형사법연구, (20), pp.191~218 (2003), 한국형사법학회
  8. Schönke, "StGB. 26", pp.339~ (2001), Aufl
  9. LK-Spendel, "StGb. 10", pp.336~ (1989), Aufl
  10. 도중진, "형사절차상 고문 방지대책", ~ (2003)
  11. 도광수, "참고인 강제수사에 관한 연구–검찰 수사 공무원으로서의 직업적 고찰–", 석사, pp.2004
  12. 박승대, "공판중심주의에 따른 수사상 대응방안 연구", 검찰, (114), pp.377~ (2003)
  13. 원재천, "미국 법원은 법정모욕죄를 포괄적으로 적용한다", 시민과 변호사, (122), pp.55~ (2004)
  14. 최병천, "미국의 수사기관에 대한 허위진술", 해외연수검사연구논문집, 19, pp.679~680 (2004)
  15. 김종구, "형사사건처리절차의 현실과 개선방안–검찰운용을 중심으로–", 박사
  16. 강동세, "위증죄와 증거인멸죄의 발생․증가원인 및 방지대책", 법조, (505), pp.60~ (1998), 법조협회
  17. 이상철, "참고인의 허위진술과 증거위조죄, In 형사판례연구 제5권", pp.301~ (1997), 박영사
  18. 이상희, "형사소송법 개정안에 대한 의견", JURIST, pp.31~32 (2003)
  19. 박승로, "참고인 조사의 절차상 문제점과 대책, In 검사세미나연수자료집󰡕 제17집", 대검찰청, 428~ (1995)
  20. 김영철, "수사절차에서의 개선입법론", 형사법연구, (22), pp.222~266 (2004), 한국형사법학회
  21. 박승환, "사법방해죄 도입에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2006
  22. 이재상, "신형사소송법", pp.124~ (2007), 박영사
  23. 전지연, "법왜곡죄의 도입방안", 형사법연구, (22), pp.885~ (2004), 한국형사법학회
  24. 유기천, "형법학각론 하", pp.274~ (1984), 일조각
  25. 허일태, "법관의 법왜곡행위에 대한 대책, In 박양빈교수회갑기념논문집", pp.264~ (1996), 법문사
  26. 김기춘, "형법개정시론", pp.582~ (1984), 삼영사
  27. 법무부, "형법개정법률안 제안이유서", 258~ (1992)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)