명예훼손과 온라인서비스제공자의 형사책임
The Criminal Responsibility of On-line Service Provider(OSP) about Defamation
0
조회
0
다운로드
17
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Considering great social influence of Internet and other information and communication networks these days, On-line Service Provider(OSP) should be responsible for illegal activities regarding its information and communication service when it does not take proper actions against the illegal activities despite acknowledgement. This paper examined OSP's civil liability and criminal liability from point of view of the Criminal Act. As a result, OSP's criminal liability shall be limited to ‘aiding and abetting by omission’ only when OSP's access and control against illegal contents are objectively admitted. Despite aforementioned legal theory, OSP's criminal responsibility of others' defamation on information and communication networks shall be prudently admitted. This is because OSP's admission of criminal responsibility can reinforce regulations on OSP's information and communication services to give chilling effects and to be likely to weaken freedom of expression that is basic rights of the Constitution. Therefore, the obligation of caution can cognize infringement upon others' legal interests caused by posts of evident illegality, and it should be limitedly admitted within specific scope that can be controlled. Defamation not only being illegal activities of the Civil Law but also being crimes of the Criminal Law have a lot of common factors, and conditions of criminal responsibility are stricter than the ones of civil responsibility are: Considering such a fact, when OSP's criminal responsibility based on others' defamation on Internet is decided, conditions of civil responsibility that have been recently suggested by civil judgment (2008DA53812) shall be minimum conditions that can admit of criminal responsibility.
Abstract
Considering great social influence of Internet and other information and communication networks these days, On-line Service Provider(OSP) should be responsible for illegal activities regarding its information and communication service when it does not take proper actions against the illegal activities despite acknowledgement. This paper examined OSP's civil liability and criminal liability from point of view of the Criminal Act. As a result, OSP's criminal liability shall be limited to ‘aiding and abetting by omission’ only when OSP's access and control against illegal contents are objectively admitted. Despite aforementioned legal theory, OSP's criminal responsibility of others' defamation on information and communication networks shall be prudently admitted. This is because OSP's admission of criminal responsibility can reinforce regulations on OSP's information and communication services to give chilling effects and to be likely to weaken freedom of expression that is basic rights of the Constitution. Therefore, the obligation of caution can cognize infringement upon others' legal interests caused by posts of evident illegality, and it should be limitedly admitted within specific scope that can be controlled. Defamation not only being illegal activities of the Civil Law but also being crimes of the Criminal Law have a lot of common factors, and conditions of criminal responsibility are stricter than the ones of civil responsibility are: Considering such a fact, when OSP's criminal responsibility based on others' defamation on Internet is decided, conditions of civil responsibility that have been recently suggested by civil judgment (2008DA53812) shall be minimum conditions that can admit of criminal responsibility.
참고문헌 (39)
- 김일수, "새로쓴형법총론(제10판)" (2004), 박영사
- 김성돈, "형법총론(제2판)" (2009), 성균관대학교출판부
- 박상기, "형법총론(제7판)" (2007), 박영사
- 배종대, "형법총론(제6판)" (2003), 홍문사
- 손동권, "형법총론(제2개정판)" (2007), 율곡출판사
- 손해목, "형법총론" (1996), 법문사
- 신동운, "형법총론(제2판)" (2006), 법문사
- 이재상, "형법총론(제5판 보정판)" (2006), 박영사
- 오영근, "형법총론(보정판)" (2005), 박영사
- 유기천, "(개정25판)" (1984), 일조각
- 임 웅, "형법총론(개정판)" (2003), 법문사
- 정영석, "형법총론(제5전정판)" (1989), 법문사
- 정영일, "형법총론(제3판)" (2010), 박영사
- 황산덕, "형법총론(제7정판)" (1989), 방문사
- 김혜경, "사이버공간에서의 표현행위와 형사책임" (2005), 한국형사정책연구원
- 사이버범죄에 대한 ISP의 형사책임에 관한 연구, "백광훈", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2003)
- 인터넷범죄의 규제법규에 관한 연구, "백광훈", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2000)
- 컴퓨터범죄에 관한 연구, "장영민", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (1993)
- 사이버범죄에 관한 연구, "조병인", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2000)
- 김성룡, , pp.84~106 (2004), 박영사
- 김성천, "인터넷상의 범죄와 형법의 적용", 인터넷법률, (9), pp.32~51 (2001), 법무부
- "2003", 99, 법원도서관
- 박미숙, "부작위와 공범", 비교형사법연구, 5(1), pp.6~162 (2003), 한국비교형사법학회
- 박희영, "인터넷 서비스 제공자의 형사책임에 관한 연구 : 독일의 개정 전자적 정보통신서비스법(TDG)를 중심으로", 인터넷법률, (22), pp.111~146 (2004)
- 백강진, "전자게시판관리자(ISP)의 책임", 웹진 사법정보연구, (5) (2001)
- 백강진, "전자게시판관리자(ISP)의 책임", 웹진 사법정보연구, (6) (2001)
- 서보학, "인터넷상의 정보유포와 형사책임", 형사정책연구, 12(3), pp.5~46 (2001), 한국형사정책연구원
- 성선제, "인터넷상의 명예훼손", 인터넷법률, (13), pp.117~135 (2002)
- 신양균, , pp.137~152 (1998), 박영사
- 염동신, "온라인서비스 제공자의 형사상 책임 : 독일 ‘연방정보통신사업법’을 중 심으로", 인터넷법률, (5), pp.138~157 (2001)
- 원형식, "사이버공간에 있어서 우리나라 형법의 적용범위", 인터넷법률, (10), pp.39~56 (2002)
- 원혜욱, "인터넷범죄의 특징과 범죄유형별 처벌조항", 형사정책연구, 11(2) (2000), 한국형사정책연구원
- 윤선희, "정보통신사회에서의 인터넷서비스운영자에 대한 고찰", 인터넷법률, (11), pp.59~73 (2002), 법무부
- 이승호, "사이버명예훼손의 처리과정에서 제기되는 법적 과제", 인터넷법률, (10), pp.5~23 (2002)
- 이용식, "부작위에 의한 정범과 공범의 구별", 서울대 법학, 40(2), pp.257~290 (1999), 서울대학교 법학연구소
- 이태규, "인터넷 사업자 책임에 관한 사례 연구 - 미국 판례와 입법례를 중심으로 -", 법학연구, 15(1), pp.133~150 (2005), 법학연구원
- 이호중, "위험정보의 유통과 인터넷서비스제공자(ISP)에 대한 형법적 규제", 비교형사법연구, 5(2-1), pp.207~236 (2003), 한국비교형사법학회
- 하태훈, "인터넷과 형법의 변화", 인터넷법률, pp.92~107 (2000), 법무부
- 黃泰正, "情報通信서비스提供者의 責任에 관한 比較法的 考察", 선진상사법률연구, (28), pp.22~72 (2005), 법무부