본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

범죄피해자 구조금 지금요건과 절차 개선방안 -미국의 범죄피해자 보상정책관의 비교를 중심으로-

A Study on the Eligibility Requirements and the Process of the Korean Victim Compensation - focusing on comparing Korean victim compensation policy with that of U.S. -

0

조회

0

다운로드

15

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Korean government revised the Crime Victim Protection Act and established the Compensation Funding Act newly in 2010 as well to facilitate victim assistance much more. It must be a significant progressive step for the development of Korean victim policy. In spite of that, there are still a few weak points in the eligibility requirements and application process of the Korean victim compensation system as it is following. Firstly, Korean compensation program have taken the 'payers of last resort' policy for a long time. In some cases, however, victim is likely to be in the troublesome situation because of the shortfall of money due to the policy. Therefore, this policy should be changed into more flexible mechanism to response effectively to the victim's needs. Secondly, the compensation program seems to be restricted within the only basic financial aid which is not enough for victim's recovery. It could make the victims be frustrated if they would not find no way to get the additional money enough for paying various tangible or nontangible costs resulted from criminal act. Thirdly, Korean compensation system has the rigid requirements of the eligibility with not paying compensation to the domestic violence victim. It is contrasted to the policy of U.S. which has allowed to receive the grants through examining the each cases even when the crime occurs in the intimate relationship. Fourthly, there is no exception rule regarding the valid application periods of the application process in Korea. Therefore, if the victims misses the chance to claim to the compensation committee within the given periods, their applications shall be refused by the officers. But the abused child and sexually assaulted woman should be given the chance to claim regardless of the time restriction. Lastly, the victim should be given information regarding the compensation system by police, prosecutors and various service providers who work for them at the initial response stage. These suggestions, if they shall be put into practice, could make the victim compensation system much more solid and contribute to enhance the victim's recovery.

Abstract

Korean government revised the Crime Victim Protection Act and established the Compensation Funding Act newly in 2010 as well to facilitate victim assistance much more. It must be a significant progressive step for the development of Korean victim policy. In spite of that, there are still a few weak points in the eligibility requirements and application process of the Korean victim compensation system as it is following. Firstly, Korean compensation program have taken the 'payers of last resort' policy for a long time. In some cases, however, victim is likely to be in the troublesome situation because of the shortfall of money due to the policy. Therefore, this policy should be changed into more flexible mechanism to response effectively to the victim's needs. Secondly, the compensation program seems to be restricted within the only basic financial aid which is not enough for victim's recovery. It could make the victims be frustrated if they would not find no way to get the additional money enough for paying various tangible or nontangible costs resulted from criminal act. Thirdly, Korean compensation system has the rigid requirements of the eligibility with not paying compensation to the domestic violence victim. It is contrasted to the policy of U.S. which has allowed to receive the grants through examining the each cases even when the crime occurs in the intimate relationship. Fourthly, there is no exception rule regarding the valid application periods of the application process in Korea. Therefore, if the victims misses the chance to claim to the compensation committee within the given periods, their applications shall be refused by the officers. But the abused child and sexually assaulted woman should be given the chance to claim regardless of the time restriction. Lastly, the victim should be given information regarding the compensation system by police, prosecutors and various service providers who work for them at the initial response stage. These suggestions, if they shall be put into practice, could make the victim compensation system much more solid and contribute to enhance the victim's recovery.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. 2011년도 예산안 부처별 분석III, "국회예산정책처", ~ (2010)
  2. 김성돈, "형법총론" (2011), SKKUP
  3. 법무부, "피해자 보호의 새로운 지평이 열리다", 법무부 인권국 인권구조과, ~ (2010)
  4. 법무부, "범죄피해자, 이제는 국가가 직접 보살펴 줍니다", 법무부 인권국 인권구조과, ~ (2010)
  5. 이호중, "피해자에 대한 물질적 지원 - 피해구조와 배상적 화해의 간극", 피해자학 연구, (8)
  6. 장규원, "미국의 범죄피해자보상제도에 관한 고찰", 피해자학연구, 11(2), pp.5~26 (2003), 한국피해자학회
  7. 장규원, "범죄피해자를 위한 재원 확보방안", 피해자학연구, 15(1)
  8. Anonymous, "Handbook on justice for victims, - On the use and application of the Decalaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power", Reprints from the collection of the University of Michigan Library, ~ (2011)
  9. Allison, J, "Compensation board denying funding to murder victim parents is appalling: Hudak :Compensation board denials appalling: Hudak" (2011), The Canadian Press
  10. Czurak, D, "Compensation program is county's best", Grand Rapids Business Journal, Grand Rapids, 28(37) (2010)
  11. Smith, H. P, "Violent Crime and Victim Compensation: Implications for Social Justice", Violence and Victims, 21(3) (2006)
  12. Holzer, J, "The Madoff Fraud:Method to Pay Ponzi Victims Criticized", Wall Street Journal, pp.3~ (2010)
  13. Dussich, J. P. J, "Raising the Global Standards for Victims : The Proposed Convention on Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Polwer", TIVI, ~ (2008)
  14. Tobolowsky, P. M, "Crime Victim Rights and Remedies" (2001), Carolina Academic Press
  15. Puro, S, "Paying for Crime: The Policies and Possibilities of Crime Victim Reimbursement", Perspectives on Political Science, 27(2), pp.103~104 (1998)
  16. Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing, "Congressional Documents and Publications, Retrieved May 19, 2011, from ProQuest Central", Document ID: 2319768041, ~ (2011)
  17. U.S. Department of Justice, "Office of Justice Programs, Office for Victims of Crime, New Directions from the Field; Victims' Rights and Services for the 21st Century", ~ (1988)
  18. Yanay, U, "Caring for Victims of Violent Crimes: Issues of Assistance and Compensation in Canada", International Journal of Canadian Studies, (32), pp.67~87 (2005)
  19. Walker, B, "Lessons that Wrongful Death Tort Law Can Learn from the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund", The Review of Litigation, 28(3), pp.595~628 (2009)
  20. Wallace, H, "Victimology", ~ (2011)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)