프레이리와 랑시에르의 해방교육론 비교

Abstract

A purposes of this study is to comparatively analysis Freire's emancipation education theory and Ranciére's one. The results of study are as follows. 1. the common views which two theories share First, Educational activities are value laden because they are involved with political activities. Second, Teacher's explanation centered teaching, named ‘banking concept of education' or ‘making fool education' is a bad teaching which is against human nature, and makes student a fool and the oppressed. It cause community to irrational and unequal one. Third, emancipation is not a work on social class but a job on recovering the human nature, so the emancipation have to be done by education. Forth, the practical strategies of emancipation education that two emancipation education theorists suggest were based on the educational experiences and the educational achievements 2. the different views that two theories have, and what the differences came from are as follows. First, Freire's emancipation education, called 'problem posing education', focuses on the dialogue between teacher and students on the ordinary living with that the students daily face, whereas Ranciére's emancipation education, called ignorant teacher's education, focused a on interaction student and their text books. Second, In Freire's emancipation education, the separation between teacher and student come to vanishes, and teacher and student become co-worker, whereas in Ranciére's emancipation education, separation between teacher and student is sticked, authority of teacher is kept on. Third, Freire's education give weight to make the society without oppression, whereas Ranciére's education give weight to expend personal intellectual freedom. Forth, The differences between Freire's education and Ranciére'one come from differences of time and place that two scholars live in and experience, and differences of academic atmosphere that they were exposed.