참여의 관점에서 바라본 피해자의 진술권
Victim's Right to Statement from the Standpoint of Participation
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
The Constitution enacted right to statement on trial of the victims and entrusted the concrete realization to Code of Crime Procedure. Code of Crime Procedure revised in 2007 extended applicant of victim statement, allowed the victim to state in a course of trial, even the victim stated in a stage of investigation, and edited out exceptive reason in application. Even with this revision, it is quite irrational that right to statement of the victims is still based on the frame of examination of witness. Once a victim states through examination of witness, the victim is no more the subject of statement, but the object of statement. On top of that, even the denial of testimony regarding personal information is not admitted, so that the dignity of a victim can be violated. It is not reasonable, in this case, that a victim states to bear of the danger to commit perjury. The judicial system must escape from the current frame of examination of witness and edit out the exceptive reason in realizing victim statement. It is time to introduce Victim Impact Statement as complementary measures about the current victim statement system. On this proposal, it is apprehended that the statement of a victim in a stage of sentencing can have an effect on the punishment of the defendant. This concern can be cleared by giving opportunity to state about damage by a crime and its influence to only the victim after becoming final of defendant's conviction. Right to victim statement is to be extended. Since we acknowledge right of victim statement as a constitutional right, a powerful right of statement is granted to the victim. Introduction of Victim Impact Statement, as complementary measures, is likely to guarantee right to victim statement substantially.
참고문헌 (46)
- 최종보고서：피해자의 인권보호와 향상을 위한 정책연구, "국가인권위원회", ~ (2004)
- 김용세, "피해자학" (2003), 형설출판사
- 김지선, "피해자의견진술제도에 관한 연구" (2008), 한국형사정책연구원
- 김형만, "일본의 범죄피해자 형사재판 참가제도에 관한 고찰", 비교형사법연구, 10(2), pp.281~303 (2008), 한국비교형사법학회
- 류병관, "형사절차상 범죄피해자권리의 헌법적 보장에 관한 연구", 피해자학연구, 14(1), pp.23~45 (2006), 한국피해자학회
- 민영성, "피해자의 양형절차에의 참가와 의견진술", 저스티스, (93), pp.164~179 (2006), 한국법학원
- 박광민, "형사절차상 피해자의 지위강화", 형사법연구, 10 (1998), 한국형사법학회
- 박상식, "범죄피해자의 의견진술권에 관한 연구", 피해자학연구, 14(1), pp.75~115 (2006), 한국피해자학회
- 박종렬, "犯罪被害者 保護에 관한 小考", 법학연구, (23), pp.417~442 (2006), 한국법학회
- 박철현, "수사단계에서의 2차 피해의 실태 및 대안", 피해자학연구, 15(1), pp.203~232 (2007), 한국피해자학회
- 법무부, "개정 형사소송법", 법무부, ~ (2007)
- 법원행정처, "개정형사소송법 해설", 법원행정처, ~ (2007)
- 서원철, "미국 형사소송법" (2005), 법원사
- 신동운, "신형사소송법" (2008), 법문사
- 이상돈, "형사사법의 세 가지 지층과 피해자의 지위", 한국피해자학회 2008년 추계학술대회<범죄피해자와 인권> 자료집 (2008)
- 이승호, "형사사법의 세 가지 지층과 피해자의 지위", 한국피해자학회 2008년 추계학술대회<범죄피해자와 인권> 자료집 (2008)
- 이용식, "형사피해자의 지위에 대한 소고", 피해자학연구, 14(1), pp.5~22 (2006), 한국피해자학회
- 이재상, "형사절차상 피해자보호방안", 형사정책연구, 3 (1992), 한국형사정책연구원
- 이정민, "일본의 피해자 참가제도와 형사재판의 변화", 한국피해자학회 춘계학술대회 (2009)
- 이호중, "수사·재판과정에서의 범죄피해자 권리보호방안연구", 대검찰청, ~ (2007)
- 정종섭, "헌법학원론" (2009), 박영사
- 천진호, "범죄피해자의 권리 확보방안", 피해자학연구, 15(1), pp.5~36 (2007), 한국피해자학회
- 하태훈, "범죄피해자의 형사절차상의 지위와 권리", 안암법학 (1993), 안암법학회
- 한생일, "부대공소제도 도입을 통한 범죄피해자의 권리강화", 형사법의 신동향, (20) (2009)
- 황태정, "범죄피해자보호 관련법제 개선방안 연구" (2006), 한국형사정책연구원
- Abrahamson, Shirley S, "Refining Roles : The Victim's Rights Movement", Utah Law Review, 517 (1985)
- Ashworth, Andrew, "Sentencing and Criminal Justice" (2004), Oxford Press
- Bandes, Susan, "Victim Impact Statement", University of Chicago Law Review, 63 (1996)
- Dahs, Hans, "Zum Persönlichkeitsschutz des Verletzten als Zeuge im Strafprozeß", Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 35 (1984)
- Erez, Enda, "Victim Participation in the Criminal Justice System", Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 20 (1987)
- Faherty, Sara, "Victims and Victims' Rights" (1999), Chelsea House Publishers
- Goldstein,Abraham S, "Defining the role of the victim in criminal prosecution", Mississippi Law Journal (1982)
- Goodey, Jo, "Victims and Victimology: Research, Policy and Practice" (2005), Longman Criminolgy
- Hassemer, Winfried, "Einführung in die Grundlagen des Strafrechts, 2", à jour gebrachte Auflage (1990)
- Henderson,Lynne N, "Revising Victim's Rights", Utah Law Review, ~ (1999)
- Kelly, Deborah P., "Victims", Wayne Law Review, 34 (1987)
- Kennard, Karen L., "The Victim's Veto : A Way to Increase Victim Impact on Criminal Case Dispositions", California Law Review, 77 (1989)
- Kwoncheol Lee, "Reasonable Limits on Victim's Right to be Heard at Capital Sentencing", Indiana University School of Law-Bloomington, ~ (2008)
- Kilpatrick,Dean G, "Constitutionally Guaranteed Participation in Criminal Proceedings for Victims: Potential Effects on Psychological Functioning", Wayne Law Review, ~ (1987)
- Roach,Kent, "Due Process and Victims' Rights : the New Law and Politics of Criminal Justice" (1999), University of Toronto Press Incorporated
- Robert C.Davis, "The Effects of Victim Impact Statements on Sentencing Decisions: A Test in an Urban Setting In Victims of Crime and the Victimization Process" (1997), Garland Publishing
- Seelman, Kurt, "Täterschutz versus Opferschutz: Recht und Kultur einer Unterscheidung", 서울대학교 법학연구소 법과 문화 포럼 발표자료 (2008)
- Talbert, Phillip, "The Relevance of Victim Impact Statements to the Criminal Sentencing Decision", U.C.L.A. Law Review, 36 (1987)
- Tränkle, Stefanie, "In the Shadow of Penal Law: Victim Offender Mediation in Germany and France", Punishment & Society, 9(4) (2007)
- Walklate,Sandra, "Imagining the Victim of Crime" (2007), Open University Press
- Weigend,Thomas, "Deliktsopfer und Strafverfahren" (1989), Duncker ＆ Humblot·Berlin