오가종파(五家宗派) 문제에서 본 운문종 법맥 논란

Abstract

Early in Zutangji and Jingde Chuandenglu, the origin of the five sects of zen was established. In the Song era Linji sect raises suspicions, with intent to attribute the origins of Yunmen sect and Fayan sect to Mazu, not Shitou. The controversy was repeated at a time when Zen’s tendancy, since Mid of Northern Song, shifted from Yunmen sect to Linji sect. Similar arguments are discovered within Yunmen sect. The Tianyi’s disciples made Xuedou’s inscription describing Yunmen Sect as to Mazu’s lineage. And in Jianzhong Jingguo Xudenglu of Yunmen sect Weipo, Xuedou was described as the ninth descendant of Mazu. In Zuting shiyuan, which interpreted Yulu of five sects centering on Yulu of Yunmen sect zen masters such as Yunmen, Xuedou and Tianyi, contents denying the origin of Shitou of Yunmen sect are found. This trend appears with the aspect in Yunmen’s biography where the encounter with Linji sect Muzhou is created and emphasized. In the zen literature of the Song era, Muzhou is elevated to the role of connecting Huangbo and Linji. It gave Muzhou the role of intermediary who gave birth to Linji and Yunmen sect. This can be understood within the trend of reconstructing Mazu's zen with Huangbo and Linji’s. Within the reconstruction of Linji sect in the Song era, there was a perception that the origins of the two sects were the identical. This controversy is begun and formed within that context.