한국어 어휘특성들이 기억폭에 미치는 효과
The Effects of Korean Lexical Characteristics on Memory Span
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
한국어 단어의 글자 수, 받침의 수와 위치, 합성어 여부가 기억폭에 미치는 효과를 검증하였다. 그 결과, 전반적으로 글자가 많은 단어일수록 기억폭이 작았으며, 두 글자 단어들에서 받침이 많을수록 기억폭이 더 작았고(기억폭에 대한 받침효과), 합성어보다 단일어의 기억폭이 더 컸다. 단어당 읽기 속도를 측정한 결과, 글자가 많은 단어일수록 속도가 느렸지만, 두 글자 단어들에서 뒷받침단어의 읽기 속도가 받침없는 단어, 앞받침단어 및 양받침단어보다 더 빨랐고(읽기 속도에 대한 말미 받침효과), 합성어보다 단일어의 읽기 속도가 더 빨랐다. 기억폭과 읽기 속도간에 관찰된 이러한 관계는 단어길이효과에 대한 음운루프설명과 잘 부합되지 않으며, 기억폭이 음운정보 뿐만 아니라 시각적 캐시에 표상되는 철자 정보의 영향을 받는다는 설명을 지지해준다.주제어 기억폭, 받침효과, 단어길이효과, 음운루프, 시각적 캐시
Abstract
The effects of the number of Hangul syllable, the number/location of batchim in a Hangul word, and compound/noncompound Hangul word on memory span were examined. The results were that (1) the more syllables a word had, the lower its memory span was, (2) the more batchims a two-syllable word had, the lower its memory span was (Korean batchim effect on memory span), (3) noncompound word had higher memory span than compound word. The reading speed of above mentioned words was measured and the results were that (1) the more syllables a word had, the slower its reading speed was, (2) but the reading speed of a two-syllable word was fastest when it had a batchim on second syllable than when it had no batchim or had a batchim on first syllable or batchims on both syllables (Korean ending batchim effect on reading speed), (3) noncompound word was read faster than compound word. Korean ending batchim effect on reading speed was not compatible with the explanation by articulatory loop but compatible with the explanation by visual cache where the orthographic information was represented. The results suggest that memory span was influenced not only by phonological information but also by orthographic information.Keywords memory span, batchim effect, word length effect, articulatory loop, visual cache
참고문헌 (16)
- 현대 한국어의 어휘빈도, "연세대학교 언어정보개발연구원", 연세대학교 언어정보개발연구원, ~, pp.CLID-WP-98-02-28 (1998)
- Baddeley, A. D, "Working memory" (1986), England: Oxford University Press
- Baddeley, A. D, "Working memory : The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 8." (1974), New York: Academic Press
- Baddeley. A. D, "Exploring the articulatory loop", Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, (36), pp.233~252 (1984)
- Baddeley, A. D, "Word length and the structure of short term memory", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, (14), pp.575~589 (1975)
- Coltheart, V, "Effects of orthographic and phonological word length on memory for lists at RSVP and STM rates", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, (30), pp.815~826 (2004)
- Dempster, F. N, "Memory span: Sources of individual and developmental differences", Psychological Bulletin, (89), pp.63~100 (1981)
- Ellis, N. C, "A bilingual word-length effect: Implications for intelligence testing and the relative ease of mental calculation in Welsh and English", British Journal of Psychology, (71), pp.43~51 (1980)
- Henry, L. A, "Memory span increase with age: A test of two hypotheses", Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, (51), pp.459~484 (1991)
- Hulme, C, "Abolishing the word-length effect", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, (30), pp.98~106 (2004)
- Naveh-Benjamin, M, "Digit span, reading rate, and linguistic relativity", Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, (38A), pp.739~751 (1986)
- Schweickert, R, "Short-term memory capacity: Magic number or magic spell?", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, (12), pp.419~425 (1986)
- Stiegler, J. W, "Digit memory in Chinese and English: Evidence for a temporally limited store", Cognition, (23), pp.1~21 (1986)
- Tehan, G, "Articulatory loop explanations of memory span and pronunciation rate correspondences: A cautionary note", Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, (26), pp.293~296 (1988)
- Watkins, M. J, "The intricacy of memory span", Memory & Cognition, (5), pp.529~534 (1977)
- Wright, C. E., "Duration differences between rare and common words and their implication for the interpretation of word frequency effects", Memory & Cognition, (7), pp.411~419 (1979)