본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

동료평가의 현황과 전망

The Current State and Prospects of Peer Assessment

박정애|박주용
한국인지과학회 (The Korean Society for Cognitive Science)|2018.06|인지과학 (Korean Journal of Cognitive Science)|제29권 제2호|pp. 85-104|DOI 10.19066/cogsci.2018.29.2.001

1

조회

0

다운로드

31

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

글쓰기피드백feedbackwriting동료평가peer assessment웹기반 시스템web-based system
주제분류인지과학

초록

동료평가란 학생들이 다른 학생의 글, 발표, 집단 활동과 같은 평가 대상이 될 수 있는 모든 결과물이나 수행 과정에 대해 점수를 매기거나 의견을 제공하는 활동을 가리킨다. 동료평가는 채점부담으로 인해 잘 활용되지 않는 글쓰기 기회를 늘릴 수 있을 뿐만 아니라, 평가를 하는 과정을 통해 학습도 향상시킬 수 있다는 장점이 있다. 본 개관 논문에서는, 주요 동료평가 시스템과 동료평가를 사용한 경험적 연구 결과를 소개한 다음, 동료평가 확산의 장애 요인을 살펴보고, 앞으로의 연구에서 해결되어야 할 과제가 논의되었다. 이 논의를 통해 동료평가에 대한 후속 연구가 활성화되고 동료평가가 실제 교육 장면에서 활용되어, 우리나라의 평가와 수업 방법에 큰 변화를 가져오기를 기대해본다.

Abstract

Peer assessment in educational setting, refers to activities in which students provide grades or comments on other students’ accomplishments such as writing, presentation, or performances. In case of writing, peer assessment can allow instructors to give out more writing assignments, which were often avoided because of the burden of grading. Moreover, grading other students’ writing can enhance learning by having students participate in the assessment process. This review will introduce major peer assessment systems and results from empirical studies on peer assessment, examine obstacles to its more wide-spread use, and discuss topics for further research. We hope this paper will facilitate further studies and use of peer assessment in actual educational settings, and eventually lead to many changes in assessment and teaching in Korea.

참고문헌 (42)

  1. 학문의 정직성에 관한 명예서약 제도 도입을 위한 정책연구 보고서, "노정혜", 서울대학교 자연과학대학, ~ (2016)
  2. 박주용, "대학 수업에서부터 시작하는 대한민국 교육개혁", 철학과 현실, 113, pp.126~150 (2017)
  3. 배수정, "대학 수업에서 누적 동료평가 점수를 활용한 성적 산출 방법의 타당성", 인지과학, 27(2), pp.221~245 (2016), 한국인지과학회[DOI]
  4. 연합뉴스, "한국 아동 ‘삶의 만족도’ OECD 최하위", ~ (2014)
  5. 이현정, "채점예시답안이 동료평가의 정확성에 미치는 영향", 석사, pp.2017
  6. Ashenafi, M. M., "Peer-assessment in higher education-twenty-first century practices, challenges and the way forward", Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(2), pp.226~251 (2017)
  7. Black, P., "Assessment for learning" (2003), Open University Press
  8. Black, P., "Assessment and classroom learning", Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), pp.7~74 (1998)
  9. Bligh, D., "What’s the use of lectures?" (1972), Penguin
  10. Bloom, B. S., "Handbook I: Cognitive domain" (1956), David McKay Company
  11. Bloxham, S., "Let’s stop the pretence of consistent marking : Exploring the multiple limitations of assessment criteria", Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3), pp.466~481 (2016)
  12. Cho, K., "Validity and reliability of scaffolded peer assessment of writing from instructor and student perspectives", Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), pp.891~901 (2006)
  13. Çiftçi, H., "Effects of peer e-feedback on Turkish EFL Students' writing performance", Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(1), pp.61~84 (2012)
  14. Dawson, P., "Assessment rubrics : Towards clearer and more replicable design, research and practice", Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(3), pp.347~360 (2017)
  15. Etkina, E., "Design and reflection help students develop scientific abilities : Learning in introductory physics laboratories", The Journal of the learning sciences, 19(1), pp.54~98 (2010)
  16. Falchikov, N., "Student peer assessment in higher education : A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks", Review of Educational Research, 70(3), pp.287~322 (2000)
  17. Finlayson, D. S., "The reliability of the marking of essays", British Journal of Educational Psychology, 21(2), pp.126~134 (1951)
  18. Hafner, J., "Quantitative analysis of the rubric as an assessment tool : An empirical study of student peer-group rating", International Journal of Science Education, 25(12), pp.1509~1528 (2003)
  19. Hunter, K., "Reducing variation in the assessment of student writing", Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(1), pp.109~124 (2011)
  20. Jeffery, D., "How to achieve accurate peer assessment for high value written assignments in a senior undergraduate course", Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(1), pp.127~140 (2016)
  21. Johnson, R. L., "Resolving score differences in the rating of writing samples: Does discussion improve the accuracy of scores?", Language Assessment Quarterly, 2(2), pp.117~146 (2005)
  22. Joordens, S., "peerScholar: An evidence-based online peer-assessment tool supporting critical thinking and clear communication", Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on e-Learning, pp.236~240 (2009)
  23. Li, H., "Peer assessment in the digital age : A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher ratings", Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(2), pp.245~264 (2016)
  24. Liu, X., "Assessment training effects on student assessment skills and task performance in a technology-facilitated peer assessment", Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(3), pp.275~292 (2014)
  25. Liu, X., "Small group discussion as a key component in online assessment training for enhanced student learning in web-based peer assessment", Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(2), pp.207~222 (2018)
  26. Park, J., "ClassPrep : A peer review system for class preparation", British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), pp.511~523 (2017)
  27. Purchase, H., "Perspectives on peer-review : Eight years of Aropä", Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(3), pp.473~487 (2018)
  28. Resnick, L., "Education and learning to think" (1986), National Academic Press
  29. Roediger, H. L., "Psychology of Learning and Motivation" (2011), Academic Press
  30. Russell J., "Variability in students’ evaluating processes in peer assessment with calibrated peer review", Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33, pp.178~190 (2017)
  31. Sadler, P. M., "The impact of self-and peer-grading on student learning", Educational Assessment, 11(1), pp.1~31 (2006)
  32. Schunn, C., "The reliability and validity of peer review of writing in high school AP English classes", Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 60(1), pp.13~23 (2016)
  33. Singleton-Jackson, J. A., "Students as consumers of knowledge: Are they buying what we’re selling?", Innovation in Higher Education, 35(5), pp.343~358 (2010)
  34. Sluijsmans, D. M. A., "Peer assessment training in teacher education : Effects on performance and perceptions", Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(5), pp.443~454 (2002)
  35. Topping, K., "Peer assessment between students in college and universities", Review of Educational Research, 68(3), pp.249~276 (1998)
  36. Tsai, Y. C., "Fostering revision of argumentative writing through structured peer assessment", Perceptual and Motor Skills, 116(1), pp.210~221 (2013)
  37. Van den Berg, I., "Peer assessment in university teaching : Evaluating seven course designs", Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(1), pp.19~36 (2006)
  38. Van Zundert, M., "Effective peer assessment processes : Research findings and future directions", Learning and Instruction, 20(4), pp.270~279 (2010)
  39. Wenglinsky, H., "The link between teacher classroom practices and student academic performance", Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10, pp.12~ (2002)
  40. Xiao, Y., "The impact of two types of peer assessment on students' performance and satisfaction within a Wiki environment", The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3-4), pp.186~193 (2008)
  41. Yucel, R., "The road to self-assessment : Exemplar marking before peer review develops first-year students’ capacity to judge the quality of a scientific report", Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(8), pp.971~986 (2014)
  42. Zheng, L. Cui, P., "Synchronous discussion between assessors and assessees in web-based peer assessment : Impact on writing performance, feedback quality, meta-cognitive awareness and self-efficacy", Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(3), pp.500~514 (2018)

관련 논문AI추천

대학 수업에서 누적 동료평가 점수를 활용한 성적 산출 방법의 타당성박주용, 배수정한국인지과학회 · 인지과학2016 · 제27권 제2호대학 교육을 위한 다목적 웹기반 동료평가 시스템 개발과 활용김민정한국교육정보미디어학회 · 교육정보미디어연구2012 · 제18권 제4호동료평가 정확도 향상 방안의 비교: 평가 기준에 대한 학생들 간 토론 대 전문가 평가 사례 제시박정애, 박주용한국인지과학회 · 인지과학2019 · 제30권 제4호Implementing Peer Assessment for Optimal Effects: Learners’ Voice조정순아시아테플 · Journal of Asia TEFL2021 · 제18권 제1호Improving Writing Performance through Peer Assessment: Beyond Academic Levels and Initial Writing Skills박주용, 송민해, 임재서한국교육공학회 · Educational Technology International2025 · 제26권 제2호동료평가에서 평가준거 수준이 학업성취, 동료평가에 대한 흥미, 평가의 신뢰도에 미치는 영향김민정한국열린교육학회 · 열린교육연구2020 · 제28권 제5호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)

죽은 사람의 마음 이론: 죽은 사람의 마음은 시공간을 초월하는가?김의선, 김성호pp. 105-120무용 숙련성에 따른 동작결과예측 능력의 차이: 삐루엣 앙 디올 동작을 중심으로이우종, 유제광, 한시완, 양종현pp. 121-135도덕 판단에서 나타나는 도덕-인습 구분에 대한 논쟁과 함의설선혜, 이승민pp. 137-160
원문 보기