금융투자상품의 투자권유에 있어서의 설명의무
The Duty of Explanation in the Solicitation of Investment Instrument under The Capital Market and Financial Investment Service Act
0
조회
0
다운로드
16
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
“The Capital Market and Financial Investment Service Act”(“the Act”) was established with the goal of the strengthening the competitiveness of the capital markets industry and protecting investors. The Act introduces rules and regulations for protecting investors, such as the know-your-customer rule, the suitability rule and the duty of explanation. The details are as follows : The Act applies to the know-your-customer rule. Before Financial Investment Company("FICs") gave an advice to a non-professional inventor concerning a designated speculation, they must take reasonable steps to ensure that they are in possession of sufficient personal and financial information of the inventor through interviews such as investment purposes, experiences, financial status, etc. It also adopts the suitability rule that FICs in the capital markets should recommend suitable financial products to the inventor upon the basis of the facts disclosed by the customer. The Act imposes the duty of explanation that obligate FICs to provide investors with detailed explanation on the contents and underlying risks of the financial products in soliciting investment. Also FICs are liable for the losses and damages incurred to inventors from their incomplete explanation. In this case, the Act has a provision to presume as an amount of loss in a private action, so that non-professional inventors don't have to verify the amount of loss. Consequently, it can be said that the protection for investors is strengthened. Although there are many desirable aspects in the Act, many problems have yet to be solved. In our country, still now there are several illegal practices in soliciting investment. For the development of capital markets, it is very important to secure the inventor's trust. I present the appropriate ways to protect the inventor's trust. So, in order for the system to solicit an investment under the Act to exercise its practical effect, a system of a proper solicitation should be supplemented. Specifically, the diversified means to restrict an investment solicitation, definite details on restriction, and system to acquire the effectiveness should be improved. The content and level to be explained by FICs in the duty of the explanation have to be indicated concretely in the provision of the duty of explanation.
참고문헌 (26)
- 이형기, "증권거래와 투자자보호", 상사법연구, 20(1), pp.502~
- 松原正至, "投資勸誘における自己責任原則·適合性原則·說明義務", 島大法學, 38(4), pp.66~ (1995)
- 김지환, "증권투자권유와 적합성원칙", 상사법연구, 21(1), pp.456~
- 권순일, "증권투자권유자 책임론" (2002), 박영사
- 박선종, "증권투자권유의 규제와 법적 책임에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2003
- 김병연, "증권투자권유규제에 대한 소고 - 자본시장통합법(안)과 관련하여 -", 비교사법, 14(1), pp.471~500 (2007), 한국비교사법학회
- 정윤모, "금융투자업자의 영업행위규제와 투자자보호", 증권, (132), pp.33~ (2007)
- 유석호, "금융투자상품과 투자자 보호", 금융법연구, 4(2), pp.3~28 (2007), 한국금융법학회
- 이경민, "자본시장 통합법(안)상의 투자자 보호", 기업법연구, 21(2), pp.9~38 (2007), 한국기업법학회
- 정준우, "증권업자의 부당한 투자권유행위의 합리적 규제방안", 비교사법, 11(3), pp.433~434
- 신용진, "證券投資者保護論의 再構成", 기업법연구, 21(3), pp.383~420 (2007), 한국기업법학회
- 우홍구, "투자권유에 있어서 증권회사의 주의의무에 관한 고찰", 일감법학, 2, pp.42~48
- 山田剛志, "金融自由化の法的構造" (2002), 信山社
- 김택주, "이익보장약정에 의한 증권거래와 투자자보호", 상사법연구, 21(2), pp.458~459
- 김택주, "증권투자권유에 있어서 주의의무", 동아법학, (26), pp.182~
- 안성포, "독일 자본시장법상 투자자보호에 관한 비교법적 고찰", 기업법연구, 20(4), pp.295~326 (2006), 한국기업법학회
- 양석완, "금융기관의 설명의무와 조언의무", 법과 정책, (10), pp.244~246
- 권기훈, "선물업자의 설명의무", 상사판례연구, (17), pp.247~279 (2004), 한국상사판례학회
- 손영화, "증권투자권유에 관한 법적 문제", 인권과 정의, (329), pp.27~42 (2004), 대한변호사협회
- 윤 광 균, "증권회사의 고객보호의무와 손해배상책임", 저스티스, (97), pp.114~134 (2007), 한국법학원
- 上柳敏郞, "適合性原則と說明義務をめぐる裁判例法理と過大", 金融法務事情, (1535), pp.28~
- 櫻井健夫, "金融商品取引法 ハンドブック-證券ㆍ保險ㆍ預金の法律と裁判實務" (2002), 日本評論社
- 石塚洋之, "Q&A 130 金融商品取引法ポイント解說" (2007), 日本經濟新聞出版社
- 北村雅史, "關聯法令の改正" (2007), 經濟法令硏究會
- 川村正幸, "金融商品取引法" (2008), 中央經濟社
- 日野正晴, "詳解 金融商品取引法" (2008), 中央經濟社
