영리법인으로서의 협동조합에 대한 법적 소고-협동조합기본법을 중심으로-
A Legal Study on the Cooperatives as a Profit Organization-Focus on the Framework Act on Cooperatives-
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
South Korea recognized advantage of branch of cooperatives as an alternative of development of economic society. Framework Act on Cooperatives was enacted in 2012. Cooperatives is Profit Corporation with commerciality. Cooperatives has its characteristic that has to operate the business that contribute to improvement of rights and interests of members of association and to community. Also it regards social unified value, equality, solidarity and trust important, and it is voluntary association. Cooperatives is a path that gives new economic opportunity to people who were excluded in existing market economy system. It could be called as number 3 sector economy system that is in charge of role that is different from number 1 sector, government part, such as country, and number 2 sector, the private profit organization. Cooperatives tries to achieve the goal by autonomy such as self-reliance, independent and self-governing. Autonomy of cooperative association can be secured with articles of association which is legislation of self-government. Expansion of range of purpose also counted. However, the way to realize autonomy is not an exclusion of management and supervision from government. Therefore, autonomy of cooperatives is secured by autonomy by articles of incorporation. It is problematical whether Framework Act on Cooperatives can perform the role of Framework Act right, and how to recognize guarantee of autonomy and limit. In order to continuously develop cooperatives and to maintain it, try to study the relation between special limit of cooperatives and social enterprise.
Abstract
South Korea recognized advantage of branch of cooperatives as an alternative of development of economic society. Framework Act on Cooperatives was enacted in 2012. Cooperatives is Profit Corporation with commerciality. Cooperatives has its characteristic that has to operate the business that contribute to improvement of rights and interests of members of association and to community. Also it regards social unified value, equality, solidarity and trust important, and it is voluntary association. Cooperatives is a path that gives new economic opportunity to people who were excluded in existing market economy system. It could be called as number 3 sector economy system that is in charge of role that is different from number 1 sector, government part, such as country, and number 2 sector, the private profit organization. Cooperatives tries to achieve the goal by autonomy such as self-reliance, independent and self-governing. Autonomy of cooperative association can be secured with articles of association which is legislation of self-government. Expansion of range of purpose also counted. However, the way to realize autonomy is not an exclusion of management and supervision from government. Therefore, autonomy of cooperatives is secured by autonomy by articles of incorporation. It is problematical whether Framework Act on Cooperatives can perform the role of Framework Act right, and how to recognize guarantee of autonomy and limit. In order to continuously develop cooperatives and to maintain it, try to study the relation between special limit of cooperatives and social enterprise.
참고문헌 (59)
- 강정혜, "사회적 기업에 대한 법적 고찰", 서울법학, 20(3), pp.109~143 (2013), 서울시립대학교 법학연구소
- "국립국어원 표준국어대사전"[URL]
- 기획재정부, "아름다운 협동조합 만들기" (2013)
- 서광문, "수산업협동조합의 본질과 이익단체론", pp.19~ (2001), 거성글미디어
- 이철송, "회사법강의(제20판)" (2012), 박영사
- 김준호, "민법강의", pp.1773~ (2013), 법문사
- 지원림, "민법강의", pp.1431~ (2008), 홍문사
- 박종두, "채권법각론", pp.281~ (2014), 박영사
- 김학동, "민법총칙", pp.181~ (2013), 박영사
- 고상현, "민법상 비영리법인의 설립에서 인가주의와 준칙주의에 관한 시론", 서울대학교 법학, 51(2), pp.103~129 (2010), 법학연구소
- 박찬주, "法人設立行爲의 性質", 고려법학, (49), pp.765~798 (2007), 법학연구원
- 박균성, "행정법강의", pp.124~ (2010), 博英社
- 홍정선, "행정법특강", pp.245~246 (2007), 박영사
- 곽윤직, "민법총칙", pp.133~ (2002), 박영사
- 김상용, "한국법사와 법정책", pp.371~ (2013), 화산미디어
- 고상룡, "민법총칙", pp.192~ (2002), 법문사
- 김주수, "민법개론", pp.119~ (2008), 삼영사
- 강태성, "제4판 민법총칙", pp.242~ (2011), 대명출판사
- 송덕수, "신민법강의", pp.417~ (2012), 박영사
- 윤형렬, "민법총칙 제4판", pp.138~ (2013), 법영사
- 이영준, "한국민법론 총칙편", pp.797~ (2003), 박영사
- 이은영, "민법총칙", pp.259~ (2009), 박영사
- 김학동, "민법총칙", pp.189~ (2013), 박영사
- 송재일, "협동조합의 원칙과 사적자치로서 정관자치", 2013년 춘계학술대회 논문집 (2013), icoop협동조합연구소
- 김종률, "법인의 권리능력에 관한 일고 - 목적에 의한 권리능력 제한론을 중심으로 - 대법원 2001.9.21. 선고 2000그98 결정", 저스티스, 통권 : 73, pp.219~220 (2001), 한국법학원
- 임종선, "비법인 사단으로서의 어촌계에 대한 소고", 경희법학, 47(3), pp.295~337 (2012), 법학연구소
- 전경운, "우리 민법상 總有에 관한 一考察", 토지법학, 26(1), pp.145~174 (2010), 한국토지법학회
- Johnston Birchall, "협동조합운동", pp.105~ (2003), 들녘
- 임종선, "준점유 등으로서 어업권의 이용에 대한 소고", 경희법학, 48(1), pp.195~236 (2013), 법학연구소
- 양동석, "自己株式取得의 制限에 관한 考察", 기업법연구, 9, pp.393~430 (2002), 한국기업법학회
- 이선희, "카르텔의 자진신고에 의한 책임감경제도와 손해배상청구소송의 상호관계에 대한 연구", 성균관법학, 25(1), pp.27~68 (2013), 법학연구소
- 이창규, "협동조합기본법과 개별 협동조합법과의 관계", 한국기업·노동·복지법학회 2013년 하계 학술대회, pp.31~ (2013)
- Karsten Schmidt, "Der Bürgeirech-rechtliche Verein mit wirtschaftlicher Tätigkeit", AcP, 182, pp.13~ (1982)
- Soergel, "Kommentar zum BGB, Band 1" (1998), Stuttgart u.a
- Kurt Stöber, "Handbuch zum Vereinsrecht" (2000), Köln
- Bamberger, Heinz Georg, "Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch, Band 1" (2003), München
- "Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gsestzbuch, Band. 1, Allgemeiner Teil", ~ (2001)
- 임건면, "비영리사단법인에 관한 독일의 최근 동향 -비영리사단법인의 영리활동을 중심으로 -", 비교사법, 15(4), pp.71~99 (2008), 한국비교사법학회
- 김진우, "營利法人과 非營利法人의 區別에 관한 法比較的 考察", 비교사법, 10(3), pp.99~130 (2003), 한국비교사법학회
- Larenz, Karl, "Allgemeiner Teil des Bürgerlichen Rechts" (1997), München
- 여하윤, "프랑스 민법상의 법인론 - 비영리법인에 관한 논의를 중심으로 -", 비교사법, 15(4), pp.101~127 (2008), 한국비교사법학회
- 박수곤, "프랑스법에서의 민사법인에 대한 규율 - 공익성이 인정된 사단 및 재단법인을 중심으로 -", 경희법학, 45(1), pp.77~111 (2010), 법학연구소
- Evelyn A. Lewis, "Enterpreneurs of Commercial Nonprofits, Is it Anybody's Business? A Perspective on Individul Property Right in Nonprofits", N.C.L. Rev, 73, pp.1761~1780 (1995)
- Henry B. Hansmann, "The Role of Nonprofit Enterprise", Yale L.J, 89, pp.835~880 (1980)
- 林良平, "新版 注釋民法(2), 總則(2) 法人·物", pp.191~ (1991), 東京
- 배원기, "일본의 비영리법인(공익법인) 제도의 개혁과 시사점 ― 우리나라 제도와의 비교를 중심으로", 한국비영리연구, 11(1), pp.3~47 (2012), 한국비영리학회
- 손주찬, "상법(상)", pp.456~ (2001), 박영사
- 임홍근, "회사법", pp.6~ (2001), 법문사
- 정동윤, "회사법", pp.10~11 (2000), 법문사
- 남수현, "수산업협동조합의 소유지배구조에 관한 연구", 수산경영론집, 33(2), pp.99~125 (2002), 한국수산경영학회
- 강희원, "협동조합 발전을 위한 법적 과제", 함께일하는재단 정책토론회 (2013)
- 최준선, "기업의 사회적책임론", 성균관법학, 17(3), pp.471~506 (2005), 법학연구소
- Social Enterprise in Europe: Recent Trends and Developments: Introduction to an Update, "Defourmy, J", 7~, pp.Working Papers Series, No. 08 (2008), 01
- 김복태, "협동조합기본법 시행에 따른 협동조합 활성화 방안에 대한 연구: 캐나다 퀘백주 사례를 중심으로", 한국정책학회 춘계학술대회, pp.60~ (2013), 한국정책학회
- 이광택, "‘사회적기업육성법’제정 및 시행 후의 발전방향", 법학논총, 20(2), pp.33~72 (2008), 법학연구소
- 이광택, "사회적기업 지원을 위한 법제도의 개선", 법학논총, 24(3), pp.239~278 (2012), 법학연구소
- 연합뉴스, "사회적기업 보조금 악용. 부정수급 4년간 31억원", ~ (2013)