본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

피고인과의 재혼과 간통고소의 효력

Remarry of Accuser and Accused & An Effect of Complaint of Adultery

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

The aim of this paper is to examine the Supreme Court decision on December 10, 2009, 2009Do7681. Specifically, this adultery case agree that Supreme Court Decision on June 24, 1975(No. 75Do1449Unanimously Agreed Verdict) previously sentenced rejection of the statute,when the divorce suit is withdrew or the accuser remarry with the accused again. It is covered in Article 229, Section 1, 2, of the Criminal Procedure Act. 'Rescission' in criminal law, however, differentiates from the 'Rescission' in civil law, that is, 'Revocation' in civil law. Accordingly,'Rescission' in criminal law will not admit retroactive punishment such as our civil law. It must admit, especially when it obviously violates Principle of subjective indivisibility of a complaint, for the crime indictable upon a complaint(Article 233) and rescission period of a complaint(Article 232, Section 1). From this point of view, I think that the judgment of Korean Supreme Court is unjust. Therefore, I examined measures to extenuate unfair punishment,although adultery is provided in the criminal law as a crime of dual punishment(Article 241, Section 1). I reviewed the various remedy in criminal procedure act for the other party of this adultery case, that is,grounds to appeal the court's decision, but I found that there is no remedy in either case. It, of course, is very important to keep the final ruling from legal stability of view. But it seems like that the Supreme Court lost its opportunity to reconsider the resolute ruling which have been hold since 1975(No. 75Do1449 Unanimously Agreed Verdict). The Supreme Court has to fully understand a goal of the criminal justice system and then they should be anticipate what the precedent's effect on actual work. For this reason, this judgment is lack of considerations about a highly sophisticated theory and reality situations. In connection with the criminal law amendment, it's a good thing that an active discussion about the deletion of adultery, in every ways of iniquity of real work and the theoretical problems of adultery.

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to examine the Supreme Court decision on December 10, 2009, 2009Do7681. Specifically, this adultery case agree that Supreme Court Decision on June 24, 1975(No. 75Do1449Unanimously Agreed Verdict) previously sentenced rejection of the statute,when the divorce suit is withdrew or the accuser remarry with the accused again. It is covered in Article 229, Section 1, 2, of the Criminal Procedure Act. 'Rescission' in criminal law, however, differentiates from the 'Rescission' in civil law, that is, 'Revocation' in civil law. Accordingly,'Rescission' in criminal law will not admit retroactive punishment such as our civil law. It must admit, especially when it obviously violates Principle of subjective indivisibility of a complaint, for the crime indictable upon a complaint(Article 233) and rescission period of a complaint(Article 232, Section 1). From this point of view, I think that the judgment of Korean Supreme Court is unjust. Therefore, I examined measures to extenuate unfair punishment,although adultery is provided in the criminal law as a crime of dual punishment(Article 241, Section 1). I reviewed the various remedy in criminal procedure act for the other party of this adultery case, that is,grounds to appeal the court's decision, but I found that there is no remedy in either case. It, of course, is very important to keep the final ruling from legal stability of view. But it seems like that the Supreme Court lost its opportunity to reconsider the resolute ruling which have been hold since 1975(No. 75Do1449 Unanimously Agreed Verdict). The Supreme Court has to fully understand a goal of the criminal justice system and then they should be anticipate what the precedent's effect on actual work. For this reason, this judgment is lack of considerations about a highly sophisticated theory and reality situations. In connection with the criminal law amendment, it's a good thing that an active discussion about the deletion of adultery, in every ways of iniquity of real work and the theoretical problems of adultery.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. 김성돈, "형법총론, 제2판" (2010), SKKUP
  2. 배종대, "형법총론, 제8전정판" (2005), 홍문사
  3. 손동권, "형법총론, 제2개정판" (2009), 율곡출판사
  4. 이재상, "형법총론, 제6판" (2009), 박영사
  5. 임웅, "형법총론, 개정판제2보정", pp.381~ (2008), 법문사
  6. 정성근, "형법총론, 제4판" (2008), 삼지원
  7. 이상철, "이혼소송과 간통고소", 형사판례연구, (3) (1995), 박영사
  8. 신동운, "신형사소송법" (2008), 법문사
  9. 이완규, "주석형사소송법 (II), 제4판" (2009), 한국사법행정학회
  10. 이선중, "주석형사소송법", pp.267~ (1976), 한국사법행정학회
  11. 배종대, "신형사소송법, 제2판" (2009), 홍문사
  12. 신양균, "신판 형사소송법" (2009), 화산미디어
  13. 이재상, "신형사소송법, 제2판", pp.17~39 (2010), 박영사
  14. 임동규, "형사소송법, 제6판" (2009), 법문사
  15. 노명선, "판례연구 형사소송법", pp.49~ (2010), 고시계사
  16. 신현주, "형사소송법, 신정2판", pp.812~ (2002), 박영사
  17. 노명선, "형사소송법" (2009), SKKUP
  18. 한국형사정책연구원, "형법개정의 쟁점과 검토", 2009년 공동학술회의 자료집, pp.189~190 (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (42건)