지식정보사회에서 국가의 역할에 관한 연구-공인인증제도 제도개선 논쟁을 중심으로-
On the Study of the role of the State in knowledge information society -Debate centered on the Improvement of accredited certification system-
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the knowledge information society, knowledge building a relationship on information and communications technology is creating and producing. In knowledge information society are major social decisions of the individuals and organizations driven by knowledge and information. That is to say, knowledge information society is a society where information is correlated knowledge and knowledge is the driving force behind the creation of the value and wealth. Thus, the analysis of the Constitutional(legal) framework of ‘Information Order’ which is very important in the knowledge-based society be done. It is time for the nation have a duty to ensure the conditions for the frame(outline) of the knowledge information society. In the knowledge information society, the excessive of state interference is not desirable because the possibility of hindrance of ‘the development of information and communication technology’ by the state interference can not be completely exclude. And pure self-regulation can not be the appropriate regulatory. For the following reasons: ⅰ) “Lack of transparency in the process of implementation issues”, ⅱ) “The risk of market failure”, ⅲ) “Problems that are not fully taken into account the interests”, ⅳ) “Problem that are not respond effectively to the interest” and ⅴ) “Avoiding the issue of state responsibility” and so on. Because of this, the third model, the 'regulated self-regulation' has emerged as the preferred state model. Also, in my conception, certification authority system concern must be answered by state from the point of view of self-regulation. Presently, on the framework set and the legal basis by nation, state need to put enterprises or individuals in the way of achieving to choose autonomously. To do this, macroscopically, institutional basis for technical development to ensure reliability and stability should be established. And, microscopically, effort to determine the long-term direction of building infrastructure which is enable to allow people to select the certificate through self-regulating competition between the various certificates market is needed. Based on the review of the pros and cons of legislation seen, in my opinion, looking for ways to realizes the private autonomy and public projects in the certification authority system is national's goal. Therefore guidelines should be concretely suggested, and support to develop the technology of certification authority system. Whatever this kind of system is better than inducing specific direction by state such as present certification authority.
Abstract
In the knowledge information society, knowledge building a relationship on information and communications technology is creating and producing. In knowledge information society are major social decisions of the individuals and organizations driven by knowledge and information. That is to say, knowledge information society is a society where information is correlated knowledge and knowledge is the driving force behind the creation of the value and wealth. Thus, the analysis of the Constitutional(legal) framework of ‘Information Order’ which is very important in the knowledge-based society be done. It is time for the nation have a duty to ensure the conditions for the frame(outline) of the knowledge information society. In the knowledge information society, the excessive of state interference is not desirable because the possibility of hindrance of ‘the development of information and communication technology’ by the state interference can not be completely exclude. And pure self-regulation can not be the appropriate regulatory. For the following reasons: ⅰ) “Lack of transparency in the process of implementation issues”, ⅱ) “The risk of market failure”, ⅲ) “Problems that are not fully taken into account the interests”, ⅳ) “Problem that are not respond effectively to the interest” and ⅴ) “Avoiding the issue of state responsibility” and so on. Because of this, the third model, the 'regulated self-regulation' has emerged as the preferred state model. Also, in my conception, certification authority system concern must be answered by state from the point of view of self-regulation. Presently, on the framework set and the legal basis by nation, state need to put enterprises or individuals in the way of achieving to choose autonomously. To do this, macroscopically, institutional basis for technical development to ensure reliability and stability should be established. And, microscopically, effort to determine the long-term direction of building infrastructure which is enable to allow people to select the certificate through self-regulating competition between the various certificates market is needed. Based on the review of the pros and cons of legislation seen, in my opinion, looking for ways to realizes the private autonomy and public projects in the certification authority system is national's goal. Therefore guidelines should be concretely suggested, and support to develop the technology of certification authority system. Whatever this kind of system is better than inducing specific direction by state such as present certification authority.
참고문헌 (42)
- 김일환, "憲法上 새로운 情報秩序確立을 위한 序說的 考察", 헌법학연구, 7(1), pp.217~ (2001)
- 김일환, "지식정보사회 관련 기본법제의 개정방향과 내용에 관한 연구", 성균관법학, 21(1), pp.441~464 (2009), 법학연구소
- 金昌奎, "知識情報化社會에 對備한 法制整備方向,", 법제연구, (17), pp.74~
- 김민호, "지식정보사회에서 행정법학의 새로운 패러다임 모색", 공법학연구, 8(3), pp.443~462 (2007), 한국비교공법학회
- 홍석한, "국가역할의 변화에 따른 규제된 자율규제에 관한 연구 : 개인정보보호 영역을 중심으로", 박사, 공법, pp.2009
- Friedrich Schoch, "Gewährleistungsverwaltung : Stärkung der Privatrechtsgesellschaft?", NVwZ, (3), pp.241~ (2008)
- Martin Eifert, "Grundversorgung mit Telekommunikationsleistung im Gewährleistungsstaat", pp.15~ (1998), Nomos
- Gunnar Folke Schuppert, "Vom Produzierenden zum gewährleistenden Staat, In Privatisierung und staatliche Regulierung", pp.539~ (1997), Nomos
- Franz-Xaver Kaufmann, "Diskussionen über Staatsaufgaben", pp.15~ (1994), Staatsaufgaben
- Claudio Franzius, "Der Gewährleistungsstaat –Ein neues Leitbild für den sich wandelnden Staat?", Der Staat, 42(4), pp.515~ (2003)
- Ingwer Ebsen, "Öffentlich-rechtliche Rahmenbedingungen einer Informationsordnung", DVBl, 1040~ (1997)
- 백수원, "헌법상 투명성 원칙에 관한 연구", 박사, 공법, pp.2011
- Matthias Freund, "Infrastrukturgewährleistung in der Telekommunikation", NVwZ, (4), pp.408~ (2003)
- Martin Burgi, "Übergreifende Regelung des Rechts der Regulierungsverwaltung - Realisierung der Kodifikationsidee?", NJW, (34), pp.244~ (2006)
- 孫晉華, "電子署名의 法的 課題", 비교사법, 5(1), pp.31~
- 金在斗, "電子署名에 관한 法的 考察", 中央法學, 6(3), pp.354~
- 김재두, "전자인증제도에 관한 법적 검토", 商事法硏究, 23(4), pp.66~
- 이정현, "전자서명·인증제도에 관한 법적 연구", 박사, 법학과 상법전공, pp.2012
- 박경혜, "공인인증제도 개선방안 시나리오 연구", 디지털융복합연구, 8(4), pp.59~71 (2010), 한국디지털정책학회
- 전자거래법 연구, , 사법연수원, 151~ (2012)
- 정완용, "제3판 전자상거래법" (2009), 법영사
- 배대헌, "정부조직 개편에 따른 전자서명의 통합 및 관련법의 개정 논의", 정보화정책, 15(4), pp.87~104 (2008), 한국정보화진흥원
- 김인범, "공인인증서 시스템의 사용자 인증정책 강화에 관한 연구", 융합보안 논문지, 10(4), pp.69~76 (2010), 한국융합보안학회
- 연도별 공인인증서 발급현황, "한국인터넷진흥원", ~ (2013)
- 송덕수, "신민법강의", pp.1280~ (2013), 박영사
- "미디어오늘", ~ (2013)
- 유비쿼터스 환경에 적합한 인증체계 구축을 위한 법‧제도 연구, "한국정보보호진흥원", ~ (2008)
- 유럽 주요국가의 전자서명 인증정책 및 제도 조사‧분석, "한국정보보호진흥원", ~ (2002)
- 아시아 주요국가의 전자서명 인증정책 및 제도 조사‧분석, "한국정보보호진흥원", ~ (2002)
- 정완용, "개정 전자서명법의 비교법적 고찰", 비교사법, 10(4), pp.3~
- Stephen E. Blythe, "DIGITAL SIGNATURE LAW OF THE UNITED NATIONS, EUROPEAN UNION, UNITED KINGDOM AND UNITED STATES : PROMOTION OF GROWTH IN E-COMMERCE WITH ENHANCED SECURITY", Richmond Journal of Law & Technology, XI(2), pp.3~
- 정철현, "PKI", pp.207~ (2003), 다산출판사
- 강태경, "전자서명 인증제도의 문제점과 발전방향", 경영정보연구, (12), pp.3~ (2003), 대한경영정보학회
- 공인전자서명인증제도 운영 현황 및 발전 방안 연구 보고서, "한국정보보호진흥원", 33~ (2003)
- Alexander Roßnagel, "Das neue Recht elektronischer Signaturen - Neufassung des Signaturgesetzes und Änderung des BGB und der ZPO", NJW, (25), pp.1817~ (2001)
- 鄭震明, "獨逸의 電子署名法制 動向", 인터넷법연구, (1), pp.529~ (2002)
- 장경원, "전자서명의 공법적 제문제 ― 독일의 법제와 그 시사점 ―", 행정법연구, (29), pp.153~176 (2011), 행정법이론실무학회(行政法理論實務學會)
- David Mccormack, "Can Corporate America Secure Our Nation? An Analysis of the Identix Framework for the Regulation and Use of Facial Recognition Technology", Boston University Journal of Science and Technology Law, (Winter), pp.147~ (2003)