소동파와 송찬호의 시 텍스트에 나타난 내포시인

Abstract

In this essay, I analyze the text structure of Sushi’s and Song’s and adjust the implied author with the Wayne C. Booth and Chatmann’s perspective. If some poem has its own story line, there is text structure. It might be arranged as ; real poet – implied poet – poetic narrator – poetic text – poetic reader – implied reader – real reader. As we can see in Song’s peach blossom, real poet is residing out of the text and poetic narrator residing in the text narrates. This poetic narrator is poetic self in the text. In this perspective, we can differentiate poetic text from poem. Implied poet can exist in the poetic text and implied poet narrates poetic story as a implied narrator. The poet and poetic narrator are different, but they can be paradoxically congruous or incongruous. Poetry is not only dictation by a poet but also narration by a poetic narrator. According to the long held theory, the poet and poetic narrator can not be divided due to the congruity of their two existences. Does the poet reside inside or outside poetry? There are two possible forms. Firstly, there is congruity between the poet and poetic narrator, as seen in Chinese classical poems. However, there is incongruity between the poet and poetic narrator, as seen in most modern poems. In the case of the second form, modern poems can be divided into several styles: long distance, middle distance and short distance between the poet and poetic narrator. The first form of congruity minimizes the imagination of the poet because of the empirical facts, but it can deepen the empirical truth. The second form of incongruity can maximize imagination, but it becomes more distant from the empirical facts and empirical truth. The narrator of Chinese poet Su Shi's poetry is himself. Su Shi(蘇軾 1037~1101) is congruous with the poetic self inside the text and narrates by himself in and outside the poetry. The poetic self narrates the poet's thoughts and emotions according to the classical form of Chinese poetry. This narrator is not representative of Su Shi alone but Su Shi himself as a poet and the poetic self simultaneously. Poet Su Shi and this poetry are directly juxtaposed in the text. There is no poetic self as in modern poetry. The narrator of Song's poetry is not Song Chan-Ho(1959 ~ ) himself but a narrator invented by him. Korean poet Song and the poetic self of the text are different. The poetic self narrates the thought and emotion according to the modern poetic free form. The narrator is embedded in the text as a representative of the poet, Song. He is an imagined narrator who is alive inside the poetic text instead of the poet himself. Once poetry has been released from the poet and been pressed into the written text, the poetic self as a narrator is an independent self with their own voice. This is a distinctive characteristic of modern poetry. We might define it as incongruity between the poet and poetic narrator. For this reason, modern poetry has been, and must be, interpreted with and without the poet himself.