본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

남극 하계 드레이크 해협의 미세생물 먹이망에서 종속영양 미소형 및 소형플랑크톤의 역할

Trophic Role of Heterotrophic Nano- and Microplankton in the Pelagic Microbial Food Web of Drake Passage in the Southern Ocean during Austral Summer

양은진|최중기|현정호
한국해양과학기술원 (Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology)|2011.12|Ocean and Polar Research|제33권 제4호|pp. 457-472

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Drake Passagepolar frontnano- and microzooplanktonheterotrophic dinoflagellatesgrazing impact
주제분류해양학

초록

To elucidate the trophic role of heterotrophic nano- and microplankton (HNMP), we investigated their biomass, community structure, and herbivory in three different water masses, namely, south of Polar Front (SPF), Polar Front Zone (PFZ), the Sub-Antarcitc Front (SAF) in the Drake Passage in the Southern Ocean, during the austral summer in 2002. We observed a spatial difference in the relative importance of the dominant HNMP community in these water masses. Ciliates accounted for 34.7% of the total biomass on an average in the SPF where the concentration of chlorophyll-a was low with the dominance of pico- and nanophytoplankton. Moreover, the importance of ciliates declined from the SPF to the SAF. In contrast,heterotrophic dinoflagellates (HDFs) were the most dominant grazers in the PFZ where the concentration of chlorophyll-a was high with the dominance of net phytoplankton. HNMP biomass ranged from 321.9 to 751.4 mgCm-2 and was highest in the PFZ and lowest in the SPF. This result implies that the spatial dynamic of HNMP biomass and community was significantly influenced by the composition and concentration of phytoplankton as a food source. On an average, 75.6%, 94.5%, and 78.9% of the phytoplankton production were consumed by HNMP in the SPF, PFZ, and SAF, respectively. The proportion of phytoplankton grazed by HNMP was largely determined by the composition and biomass of HNMP, as well as the composition of phytoplankton. However, the herbivory of HNMP was one of the most important loss processes affecting the biomass and composition of phytoplankton, particularly in the PFZ. Our results suggest that the bulk of the photosynthetically fixed carbon was likely reprocessed by HNMP rather than contributing to the vertical flux in Drake Passage during the austral summer in 2002.

Abstract

To elucidate the trophic role of heterotrophic nano- and microplankton (HNMP), we investigated their biomass, community structure, and herbivory in three different water masses, namely, south of Polar Front (SPF), Polar Front Zone (PFZ), the Sub-Antarcitc Front (SAF) in the Drake Passage in the Southern Ocean, during the austral summer in 2002. We observed a spatial difference in the relative importance of the dominant HNMP community in these water masses. Ciliates accounted for 34.7% of the total biomass on an average in the SPF where the concentration of chlorophyll-a was low with the dominance of pico- and nanophytoplankton. Moreover, the importance of ciliates declined from the SPF to the SAF. In contrast,heterotrophic dinoflagellates (HDFs) were the most dominant grazers in the PFZ where the concentration of chlorophyll-a was high with the dominance of net phytoplankton. HNMP biomass ranged from 321.9 to 751.4 mgCm-2 and was highest in the PFZ and lowest in the SPF. This result implies that the spatial dynamic of HNMP biomass and community was significantly influenced by the composition and concentration of phytoplankton as a food source. On an average, 75.6%, 94.5%, and 78.9% of the phytoplankton production were consumed by HNMP in the SPF, PFZ, and SAF, respectively. The proportion of phytoplankton grazed by HNMP was largely determined by the composition and biomass of HNMP, as well as the composition of phytoplankton. However, the herbivory of HNMP was one of the most important loss processes affecting the biomass and composition of phytoplankton, particularly in the PFZ. Our results suggest that the bulk of the photosynthetically fixed carbon was likely reprocessed by HNMP rather than contributing to the vertical flux in Drake Passage during the austral summer in 2002.

참고문헌 (59)

  1. Archer SD, "Microbial dynamics in coastal waters of east Antarctica: herbivory by heterotrophic dinoflagellates", Mar Ecol Prog Ser, 139, pp.239~255 (1996)
  2. Azam F, "The ecological role of water-column microbes in the sea", Mar Ecol Prog Ser, 10, pp.257~263 (1983)
  3. Becquevort S, "Differences of the protozoan biomass and grazing during Spring and Summer in the Indian sector of the Southern Ocean", Polar Biol, 23, pp.309~320 (2000)
  4. Bernard KS, "Mesozooplankton community structure and grazing impact in the Polar Front Zone of the south Indian Ocean during austral summner 2002", Polar Biol, 26, pp.268~275 (2003)
  5. Børsheim KY, "Cell volume to cell carbon conversion factors for a bacterivorous Monas sp. enriched from seawater", Mar Ecol Prog Ser, 36, pp.171~175 (1987)
  6. Brown SL, "Microbial community abundance and biomass along a 180° transect in the equatorial Pacific during an El Niño- Southern oscillation cold phase", J Geophys Res, 108, pp.8139~ (2003)[DOI]
  7. Burkill PH, "Microzooplankton and their role in controlling phytoplankton growth in the marginal ice zone of the Bellingshausen Sea", Deep- Sea Res II, 42, pp.1277~1290 (1995)
  8. Busalacchi AJ, "The role of the Southern ocean in global processes: an earth system science approach", Antarctic Sci, 16, pp.363~368 (2004)
  9. Calbet A, "Phytoplankton growth, microzooplankton grazing, and carbon cycling in marine system", Limnol Oceanogr, 49, pp.51~57 (2004)
  10. Carmack EC, "Water characteristics of the Southern Ocean south of the Polar Front in A Voyage of Discovery", pp.15~41 (1977), Pergamon Press
  11. Caron DA, "Microzooplankton herbivory in the Ross Sea, Antarctica", Deep-Sea Res II, 47, pp.3249~3272 (2000)
  12. Dolan J, "The reliability of grazing rate estimates from dilution experiments: Have we overestimated rates of organic carbon consumption", Ocean Sci Discuss, 1, pp.21~36 (2005)
  13. Dubischar CD, "Grazing impact of copepods and salps on phytoplankton in the Atlantic sector of the Southern Ocean", Deep-Sea Res II, 44, pp.415~433 (1997)
  14. Edler L, "Phytoplankton and chlorophyll. In: Edler L (ed) Recommendations on methods for marine biological studies in the Baltic Sea", pp.13~25 (1979), Baltic Marine Biologists Publication
  15. El-Sayed SZ, "Biological aspects of the pack-ice ecosystem in Symposim on Antarctic ice and water masses", pp.35~54 (1971), Scientific communications on Antarctic Research
  16. Froneman PW, "Biogeographic study of the planktonic communities of the Prince Edward Islands (Southern Ocean)", J Plankton Res, 20, pp.653~669 (1998)
  17. Froneman PW, "Protozooplankton community structure and grazing impact in the eastern Atlantic sector of the Southern Ocean in austral summer 1998", Deep-Sea Res II, 51, pp.2633~2643 (2004)
  18. Froneman PW, "Structure and grazing of the microzooplankton communities of the subtropical convergence and a warm-core eddy in the Atlantic sector of the Southern Ocean", Mar Ecol Prog Ser, 135, pp.237~245 (1996)
  19. Garrison DL, "Protozooplankton in the Weddell Sea, Antarctica: abundance and distribution in the ice-edge zone", Polar Biol, 9, pp.341~351 (1989)
  20. Gordon AL, "Structure of Antarctic waters between 20°W and 170°W in Antarctic map folio series, vol 6", pp.1~10 (1967), American Geography Society
  21. Grattepanche JD, "Microzooplankton herbivory during the diatom-Phaeocystis spring succession in the eastern English Channel", J Exp Mar Biol Ecol, 404, pp.87~97 (2011)
  22. Hansen,PJ, "Prey size selection, feeding rates and growth dynamics of heterotrophic dinoflagellates with special emphasis on Gyrodinium spirale", Mar Biol, 114, pp.327~334 (1992)
  23. Hanson RB, "Spatial distribution, structure, biomass, and physiology of microbial assemblages across the Southern Ocean frontal zone during the late Austral winter", Appl Environ Microbiol, 49, pp.1029~1039 (1985)
  24. Hansen PJ, "Phagotrophic mechanisms and prey selection in free-living dinoflagellates", J Eukaryot Microbiol, 46, pp.382~389 (1999)
  25. Hewes CD, "Alternative carbon pathways at lower trophic levels in the Antarctic food web in Antarctic nutrient cycles and food webs", pp.277~283 (1985), Springer
  26. Holm-Hansen O, "Factors influencing the distribution, biomass, and productivity of phytoplankton in the Scotia Sea and adjoining waters", Deep-Sea Res II, 51, pp.1333~1350 (2004)
  27. Kang H-K, "Length and weight relationship of Acartia steueri (Copepoda: Calanoida) in Ilkwang Bay, Korea", J Korean Fish Soc, 30, pp.906~908 (1997)
  28. Kivi K, "Late winter microbial communities in the western Weddell Sea (Antarctica)", Polar Biol, 14, pp.389~399 (1994)
  29. Klaas C, "Microprotozooplankton distribution and their potential grazing impact in the Antarctic Circumpolar Current", Deep-Sea Res II, 44, pp.375~393 (1997)
  30. Kopczynska E, "Spring phytoplankton assemblages in the Southern Ocean between Australia and Antarctica", Polar Biol, 31, pp.77~88 (2007)
  31. Landry MR, "Estimating the grazing impact of marine micro-zooplankton", Mar Biol, 67, pp.283~288 (1982)
  32. Landry MR, "Initiation of the spring phytoplankton increase in the Antarctic Polar Front Zone at 170°W", J Geophys Res, 106, pp.13903~13915 (2001)
  33. Laubscher RK, "Phytoplankton production and biomass at frontal zones in the Atlantic sector of the Southern Ocean", Polar Biol, 13, pp.471~481 (1993)
  34. Legendre L, "Microbial food webs and the export of biogenic carbon in the oceans", Aquat Microb Ecol, 9, pp.69~77 (1995)
  35. Levinsen H, "Plankton community structure and carbon cycling on the western coast of Greenland during the stratified summer situation. Heterotrophic dinoflagellates and ciliates", Aquat Microb Ecol, 16, pp.217~232 (1999)
  36. Longhurst AR, "Ecological geography of the sea", pp.398~ (1998), Academic Press
  37. Menden-Deuer S, "Carbon to volume relationships for dinoflagellates, diatoms and other protist plankton", Limnol Oceanogr, 45, pp.569~579 (2000)
  38. Michaels AF, "Primary production, sinking fluxes and the microbial food web", Deep-Sea Res I, 35, pp.473~490 (1988)
  39. Moore JK, "Phytoplankton chlorophyll distributions and primary production in the Southern Ocean", J Geophys Res, 105, pp.28709~28722 (2000)
  40. Orsi AH, "On the meridional extent and fronts of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current", Deep-Sea Res I, 42, pp.641~673 (1995)
  41. Pakhomov EA, "Comparative structure of the macrozooplankton", micronekton communities of the Subtropical and Antarctic Polar Fronts, 1994, pp.111, 155~169
  42. Pearce I, "Marine microbial ecology in the sub- Antarctic Zone: Rate of bacterial and phytoplankton growth and grazing by heterotrophic protists", Deep-Sea Res II, 58, pp.2248~2259 (2011)
  43. Pedrós-Alió C, "Microbial plankton across Drake Passage", Polar Biol, 16, pp.613~622 (1996)
  44. Putt M, "An experimentally determined carbon: volume ratio for marine “oligotrichous” ciliates from estuarine and coastal waters", Limnol Oceanogr, 34, pp.1097~1103 (1989)
  45. Safi KA, "Microzooplankton composition, biomass and grazing rates along the WOCE SR3 line between Tasmania and Antarctica", Deep-Sea Res II, 54, pp.1025~1041 (2007)
  46. Selph KE, "Microbial community composition and growth dynamics in the Antarctic Polar Front and seasonal ice zone during late spring 1997", Deep-Sea Res II, 48, pp.4059~4080 (2001)
  47. Sherr EB, "Heterotrophic protists in the central Arctic ocean", Deep-Sea Res II, 44, pp.1665~1682 (1997)
  48. Strom SL, "Microplankton growth, grazing, and community structure in the northern Gulf of Mexico", Mar Ecol Prog Ser, 130, pp.229~240 (1996)
  49. Sommer US, "Near surface nutreint and phytoplankton distribution in the Drake Passage during early December", Polar Biol, 6, pp.107~110 (1986)
  50. Talley LD, "Antarctic Intermediate Water in the South Atlantic in The South Atlantic: present and past circulation", pp.219~238 (1996), Springer-Verlag
  51. Tsuda A, "Microzooplankton grazing in the surface water of the Southern ocean during an austral summer", Polar Biol, 18, pp.240~245 (1997)
  52. Verity PG, "Relationships between lorica volume, carbon, nitrogen and ATP content of tintinnids in Narragansett Bay", J Plankton Res, 6, pp.859~868 (1984)
  53. Verity PG, "Microzooplankton grazing of primary production at 140°W in the equatorial Pacific", Deep-Sea Res II, 43, pp.1227~1255 (1996)
  54. Veth C, "Physical anatomy of fronts and surface waters in the ACC near the 6°W meridian during austral spring 1992", Deep-Sea Res II, 44, pp.23~49 (1997)
  55. Vincent WF, "Microbial ecosystems of Antarctica", pp.320~ (1988), Cambrigae University Press
  56. Ward P, "The Southern Antarctic Circumpolar current front: physical and biologic- al coupling at South Georgia", Deep-Sea Res I, 49, pp.2183~2202 (2002), 2183-2202
  57. Wylie JL, "The relative importance of bacteria and algae as food sources for crustacean zooplankton", Limnol Oceanogr, 36, pp.708~728 (1991)
  58. Yang EJ, "Distribution and structure of heterotrophic protists communities in the northeast equatorial Pacific Ocean", Mar Biol, 146, pp.1~15 (2004)
  59. Zhou M, "Dynamics of the current system in the southern Drake Passage", Deep-Sea Res I, 57, pp.1039~1048 (2010)

관련 논문AI추천

북서태평양에서 종속영양 원생생물 군집 및 섭식압의 해역별 비교김웅서, 양은진, 주세종한국해양과학기술원 · Ocean and Polar Research2008 · 제30권 제3호하계 동중국해 북부해역에서 종속영양박테리아의 분포 특성 및 미생물 먹이망의 역할윤석현, 김보미나한국환경생물학회 · 환경생물2023 · 제41권 제1호남극해 드레이크해협 해수의 질산염 농도와 질소동위원소 값의 변화김부근, 신형철, 장양희, 홍창수, Daniel M. Sigman, Yi Wang한국해양과학기술원 · Ocean and Polar Research2008 · 제30권 제4호섬모충류에 대한 요각류 Acartia hongi의 섭식: 실험실 연구양은진, 최중기한국해양과학기술원 · Ocean and Polar Research2009 · 제31권 제3호저수온기 동해연안의 식물플랑크톤 크기에 따른 군집구조장만, 이주연한국환경생물학회 · 환경생물2014 · 제32권 제3호동해 울진 바다목장해역의 크기별 식물플랑크톤 생물량의 시 · 공간적 분포 특성윤양호한국환경생물학회 · 환경생물2016 · 제34권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)

Observation of Semi-diurnal Internal Tides and Near-inertial Waves at the Shelf Break of the East China Sea박재훈, 이흥재, Binghuo Guopp. 409-419울진 주변 해역 대형저서동물 군집의 시·공간 분포와 환경요인과의 관계유옥환, 백상규, 이형곤, 이재학pp. 421-434남해연안 전복양식장 퇴적물의 황산염 환원과 철 환원에 의한 유기물 분해 특성현정호, 김보미나, 최아연, 안성욱, 김형철, 정래홍, 이원찬pp. 435-445지구시스템모형을 이용한 황동중국해 이산화탄소분압 분포 특성 평가박영규, 최상화, 김철호pp. 447-455지방어항개발의 투자결정요인 분석 - 충청남도 어항 중심으로 -이광남, 정진호, 최재욱pp. 473-483
원문 보기