『국민문학』의 좌담회 연구
A Study on symposium of 『Kukminmunhak』
0
조회
0
다운로드
12
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The aims of this article is to explain the discourse of Joseon-kukminmunhak, for researching the symposium of kukminmunhak . The discourse of Joseon-kukminmunhak intend to blend in korean and japanese living korea, and plan to make a new identity. Japanese demand to be study japanese identity of a korean. but korean take the ground that the discourse of Joseon-kukminmunhak has to seek for originality of Joseon-kukminmunhak. Korean and japanese don't have methods of bridging the gap of a difference of viewpoint. What was interesting, the process of development in the discourse of Joseon-kukminmunhak, is that korean's theory is more bold and delicate than Japanese's. This is why as follows. Firstly, Japan don't fight against China and America without korean's helping under the Total war. secondly, Japanese don't give a universal truth as regional hegemony to korean. That's why Korean lead the discourse of Joseon-kukminmunhak. But discourse of Joseon-kukminmunhak works as covering up a unfair relationship between Korean and Japanese.
Abstract
The aims of this article is to explain the discourse of Joseon-kukminmunhak, for researching the symposium of kukminmunhak . The discourse of Joseon-kukminmunhak intend to blend in korean and japanese living korea, and plan to make a new identity. Japanese demand to be study japanese identity of a korean. but korean take the ground that the discourse of Joseon-kukminmunhak has to seek for originality of Joseon-kukminmunhak. Korean and japanese don't have methods of bridging the gap of a difference of viewpoint. What was interesting, the process of development in the discourse of Joseon-kukminmunhak, is that korean's theory is more bold and delicate than Japanese's. This is why as follows. Firstly, Japan don't fight against China and America without korean's helping under the Total war. secondly, Japanese don't give a universal truth as regional hegemony to korean. That's why Korean lead the discourse of Joseon-kukminmunhak. But discourse of Joseon-kukminmunhak works as covering up a unfair relationship between Korean and Japanese.
참고문헌 (12)
- "국민문학", ~
- "조광", ~
- "총동원", ~
- 고봉준, "지성주의 파탄과 국민문학론", 한국시학연구, (17), pp.5~30 (2006), 한국시학회
- 박광현, "국민문학의 기획과 전망", 배달말, (37), pp.321~347 (2005)
- 박노현, "내선인과 국민문학: 신민족에 의한 신문학 고안의 기획", 한국어문학연구, (42), pp.253~270 (2004), 한국어문학연구학회
- 윤대석, "식민지 국민문학론" (2006), 역락
- 허윤회, "1940년대 전반기의 시론에 대하여 - 김종한의 시론을 중심으로", 민족문학사연구, (32), pp.252~280 (2006), 민족문학사학회
- 田村章, "民文の容 -崔載瑞 1941~1945-", 日本語文學, 1(32), pp.177~192 (2007), 한국일본어문학회
- 藤石貴代, "김종한과 국민문학", 사이, (1), pp.131~150 (2006), 국제한국문학문화학회
- 슬라보예 지젝, "이데올로기라는 숭고한 대상" (2002), 인간사랑
- 테리 이글턴, "비평의 기능" (1991), 제3문학사
