본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The European Union’s Policy Toward North Korea: Abandoning Engagement

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This article helps understand the change in the European Union (EU)’s policy toward North Korea. In the first phase of their relationship, the EU actively participated in the security dialogue on the Korean Peninsula and engaged North Korea through economic and humanitarian assistance. Since 2003, Europe abandoned the conciliatory approach and repeatedly condemned Pyongyang’s nuclear and missile tests, while disengaging from regional security initiatives. This change was a byproduct of the consolidation of the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy. Two of its main features restricted the range of diplomatic options available to the EU in dealings with North Korea. The first was the designation of a possible Weapons of Mass Destruction arms race in the Middle East as an issue of highest security concern for Europe. The second was a firm commitment to the relationship with the United States in addressing security threats. In order to maintain the consistency of its foreign strategy, the EU stopped tolerating activities related to the proliferation of nuclear weapons. Moreover, its policies became consistent with Washington’s line of action, which required terminating economic support and discontinuing independent diplomatic engagement with the “rogue” state.

Abstract

This article helps understand the change in the European Union (EU)’s policy toward North Korea. In the first phase of their relationship, the EU actively participated in the security dialogue on the Korean Peninsula and engaged North Korea through economic and humanitarian assistance. Since 2003, Europe abandoned the conciliatory approach and repeatedly condemned Pyongyang’s nuclear and missile tests, while disengaging from regional security initiatives. This change was a byproduct of the consolidation of the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy. Two of its main features restricted the range of diplomatic options available to the EU in dealings with North Korea. The first was the designation of a possible Weapons of Mass Destruction arms race in the Middle East as an issue of highest security concern for Europe. The second was a firm commitment to the relationship with the United States in addressing security threats. In order to maintain the consistency of its foreign strategy, the EU stopped tolerating activities related to the proliferation of nuclear weapons. Moreover, its policies became consistent with Washington’s line of action, which required terminating economic support and discontinuing independent diplomatic engagement with the “rogue” state.

참고문헌 (72)

  1. Art, Robert J., "Balance of Power" (2004), Stanford University Press
  2. "US and EU ‘Must Not Be Rivals’" (2003)[URL]
  3. BBC Monitoring: Asia Pacific, "EU Parliament Calls for Entry to North Korea Talks", ~ (2005)
  4. Becher, Klaus, "Has-been, Wannabe, or Leader", European Security, 13(4), pp.345~359 (2003)
  5. Berkofsky, Axel, "EU’s Policy Towards the DPRK – Engagement or Standstill?", Briefing Paper, European Institute for Asian Studies, ~ (2003)
  6. A History of Ballistic Missile Development in the DPRK, "Bermudez, Joseph", Center for Nonproliferation Studies, ~, pp.Occasional Paper No.2 (1999)
  7. Bretherton, Charlotte, "The European Union as a Global Actor" (2005), Routledge
  8. Cameron, Fraser, "A Common Policy for Europe?" (1998), Routledge
  9. "How Can Europe Contribute to Northeast Asia’s Security" (2017)[URL]
  10. "European Union to Send Food Aid to North Korea" (2011)[URL]
  11. "Bush Holds Talks with Chirac" (2002)[URL]
  12. Dee, Megan, "The EU’s Multilateralist Combat Against the Proliferation of WMD in the NPT: Mirroring the Great Bargain", European Security, 24(1), pp.1~18 (2015)
  13. Dryburgh, Lynne, "The EU as a Global Actor? EU Policy Towards Iran", European Security, 17(2), pp.253~271 (2008)
  14. The EU’s Role in Stabilizing the Korean Peninsula, "Esteban, Mario", Real Instituto Elcano, ~, pp.Working Paper 01 (2019), 2019
  15. European Commission, "Towards a New Asian Strategy – Communication from the Commission to the Council", July 13, 1994. COM (94) 314 final, ~ (1994)
  16. European Commission, "EU Republic of Korea Relations", March 30, 2001. MEMO, 111, pp.2001, ~
  17. European Commission, "The EC – Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) Country Strategy Paper 2001-2004" (2002), European Commission
  18. European Commission, "North Korea", October, 2003. DG Trade A2, SG, pp.WB, 2003[DOI]
  19. Annex to the ECHO Annual Report 2004, "European Commission", ~ (2005)
  20. European Commission, "The EU in the World – The Foreign Policy of the European Union" (2007), European Commission
  21. Annex to the Report from the Commission Directorate-General for Humanitarian Aid – ECHO Annual Report 2007, "European Commission", ~ (2008)
  22. European Commission, "Evaluation of ECHO’s Actions in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (2004-2007)", Contract ECHO, BUD, pp.2007, 01213[DOI]
  23. European Community Humanitarian Office, "Annual Review 1997" (1997), European Commission
  24. European Community Humanitarian Office, "Annual Review 1998" (1998), European Commission
  25. European Community Humanitarian Office, "Annual Review 1999" (1999), European Commission
  26. European Community Humanitarian Office, "Annual Review 2000" (2000), European Commission
  27. European Community Humanitarian Office, "Annual Review 2002" (2002), European Commission
  28. European Community Humanitarian Office, "Annual Review 2003" (2003), European Commission
  29. European Council, "Press Release on 2518th Council Meeting on External Relations", June 16. 2003 10369, 2003
  30. European Community Humanitarian Office, "Javier Solana, EU High Representative for the CFSP Condemns Nuclear Test by North Korea", October 9, 2006. S280, 2006
  31. European Community Humanitarian Office, "Javier Solana, EU High Representative for the CFSP Condemns Nuclear Test by North Korea", May 25, 2009. S136, 2009
  32. European Community Humanitarian Office, "A Secure Europe in a Better World: The European Security Strategy" (2003), European Council
  33. European Community Humanitarian Office, "EU Strategy Against Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, December 10, 2003. 15708", 03, 2003
  34. "EU Restrictive Measures Against North Korea"[URL]
  35. European Parliament, "Resolution on Relations between the European Union and the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea", January 9, 2001. B5-0037, 2001 (2001)
  36. Report of Proceedings, "European Parliament", ~ (2003)
  37. European Parliament, "Declaration by the Presidency on Behalf of the European Union, Following the IAEA Resolution of 12 February 2003 on North Korea", January 31, 2003. PE 327.466, ~ (2003)
  38. European Parliament, "Note on the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) and Its Relations with the European Union", October 10, 2006. DGExPo, PolDep, pp.Note, 2006_ 165[DOI]
  39. European Parliament, "Delegation for Relations with the Korean Peninsula", 7th EP, 2003, ~
  40. "Press Release of Ad Hoc Delegation visit to North Korea 21-24 February 2004" (2004)[URL]
  41. European Parliament, "Minutes of Meeting with Mr. Pak Hyon-Bo, Ambassador of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea", January 18, 2005. PE, PV, pp.01-05, 2005[DOI]
  42. European Parliament, "Report on Working Group Visit to Pyongyang and Seoul 22 October – 1 November 2007", CR\699297EN, ~ (2007)
  43. Ruediger Frank, "EU-NORTH KOREAN RELATIONS: NO EFFORT WITHOUT REASON", International Journal of Korean Unification Studies, 11(2), pp.87~119 (2002), 통일연구원
  44. Haass, Richard N., "Terms of Engagement: Alternative to Punitive Policies", Survival, 42(2), pp.113~135 (2000)
  45. Ishigaki, Yasuji, "Iraq War – A First Major Test of the CFSP of the European Union and Japan’s Strategic Choice", Paper presented at the 3rd Conference of European Union Studies Association - Asia Pacific (EUSA-AP) (2005)
  46. Kim, Sung Chull, "Engagement with North Korea: A Viable Alternative" (2009), SUNY Press
  47. Sangtu Ko, "Vanguard of European Politics: The Role of Member States in the EU’s Foreign Policy toward North Korea", Journal of International and Area Studies, 15(1), pp.47~59 (2008), 국제학연구소[DOI]
  48. Korea Institute for International Economic Policy, "North Korea’s Foreign Economic Outlook", World Economy Update, 8(8) (2008)
  49. Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organization, "Annual Report 2001" (2001), KEDO
  50. Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organization, "Annual Report 2003" (2003), KEDO
  51. "The EU Stretches Its Foreign Policy Wings over Korea" (2005)[URL]
  52. Ljunggren, Borje, "North Korea in the World Economy" (2003), RoutledgeCurzon
  53. Mölling, Christian, "Nuclear Weapons after the 2010 NPT Review Conference" (2010), EU Institute for Security Studies
  54. "The DPRK Briefing Book: EU Troika Visit to Pyongyang and Seoul"[URL]
  55. "Iran Rejects European Offer to End Its Nuclear Impasse" (2005)[URL]
  56. Official Journal of the European Union, "European Parliament Resolution on the Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organization (KEDO)", Vol. 47, January 22, 2004. C 16 E., ~ (2004)
  57. Official Journal of the European Union, "Council Common Position 2005", 329, Vol. 48, April 27, 2005. L 106, pp.2005, ~
  58. Official Journal of the European Union, "Council Common Position 2006", 795, Vol. 49, November 22, 2006. L 322, pp.2006, ~
  59. "The EU Is Irrelevant in the Korean Peninsula, Right? Wrong" (2018)[URL]
  60. "North Korea’s Denuclearization: Is There a Role for Europe?" (2019)[URL]
  61. "EU Support for North Korean Denuclearization: Brussels May Help Pay for Implementation If It Can Play" (2019)[URL]
  62. Park, John S., "The Long Shadow: Nuclear Weapons and Security in 21st Century Asia" (2008), Stanford University Press
  63. The Role of the EU in the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons: The Way to Thessaloniki and Beyond, "Portela, Clara", Peace Research Institute in Frankfurt, ~, pp.Report No. 65 (2003)
  64. Recchia, Stefano, "Did Chirac Say ‘Non’? Revisiting UN Diplomacy on Iraq, 2002-03", Political Science Quarterly, 130(4), pp.625~654 (2002)
  65. "Washington Urges Caution in Helping N. Korea" (1997)[URL]
  66. "North Korea Says It Has a Program on Nuclear Arms" (2002)[URL]
  67. Sauer, Tom, "Struggling on the World Scene: An Over-ambitious EU versus a Committed Iran", European Security, 17(2-3), pp.273~293 (2008)
  68. Schweiss, Christina. M., "Sharing Hegemony: The Future of Transatlantic Security", Cooperation and Conflict, 38(3), pp.211~234 (2003)
  69. Solana, Javier, "Europe and America : Partners of Choice", Speech at the annual dinner of the Foreign Policy Association, New York, May 7, 2003, ~ (2003)
  70. "Kim Turns on the Charm for EU Team" (2003)[URL]
  71. Yoon, Jeong-won, "Chronology of NK Nuclear Issues (1956.3~2003.3)", The Journal of Strategic Studies, 16(1), pp.163~198 (2009)
  72. "Commentary: Europe’s North Korea Moment" (2018)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (2건)