1930년대 수필 장르비평의 양상
The Trend of Essay Genre Criticism in 1930's
2
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article has considered the trend of essay criticism under the premise that essay criticism in 1930's has been developed focusing on genre criticism. Accordingly, this article verified that essay genre criticism in 1930's was made based largely on three issues and arranged them. They are the theory of 'essay as an essay', the theory of 'essay as a surrounding literature', and the theory of 'essay as an expression of individuality'First, those who major in foreign literatures like Gwang-seop Kim define the essay as an essay concept of western literature. They name articles of non-fictional prose types spread to literary world at that times as an 'essay' and explain its concept based on western essay. It seems that the recognition of 'supil(수필) = essay' was generally and widely spread. Second, the criticism developed with an issue, 'is an essay literature,or not? 'recognizes the essay as 'peripheral literature' or 'wide sense of literature' and does not consider it into the area of professional literature. The criticism of Hwa Lim who set out a logical argument by applying 'the shape of literature' to the above shows a high level in essay genre criticism in 1930's Third, 'the expression of individuality' is recognized as an essential characteristic of essay. The basis of recognition that essay is a literature of 'self-confession' or 'self-examination' is prepared here. The essay theory of Gwang-seop Kim and Jin-seop Kim are centered in such point of view. Tae-jun Lee recognizes even the aesthetic of essay and style. The viewpoint which considers informal essay as an essence of essay continues to recent days from starting here. The discussions of essay criticism in 1930's still remain as vital tasks to recognize the essay even now. Therefore, essay genre criticism in 1930's is meaningful in which it became a foundation of our universal recognition to essay genre and its nature.
Abstract
This article has considered the trend of essay criticism under the premise that essay criticism in 1930's has been developed focusing on genre criticism. Accordingly, this article verified that essay genre criticism in 1930's was made based largely on three issues and arranged them. They are the theory of 'essay as an essay', the theory of 'essay as a surrounding literature', and the theory of 'essay as an expression of individuality'First, those who major in foreign literatures like Gwang-seop Kim define the essay as an essay concept of western literature. They name articles of non-fictional prose types spread to literary world at that times as an 'essay' and explain its concept based on western essay. It seems that the recognition of 'supil(수필) = essay' was generally and widely spread. Second, the criticism developed with an issue, 'is an essay literature,or not? 'recognizes the essay as 'peripheral literature' or 'wide sense of literature' and does not consider it into the area of professional literature. The criticism of Hwa Lim who set out a logical argument by applying 'the shape of literature' to the above shows a high level in essay genre criticism in 1930's Third, 'the expression of individuality' is recognized as an essential characteristic of essay. The basis of recognition that essay is a literature of 'self-confession' or 'self-examination' is prepared here. The essay theory of Gwang-seop Kim and Jin-seop Kim are centered in such point of view. Tae-jun Lee recognizes even the aesthetic of essay and style. The viewpoint which considers informal essay as an essence of essay continues to recent days from starting here. The discussions of essay criticism in 1930's still remain as vital tasks to recognize the essay even now. Therefore, essay genre criticism in 1930's is meaningful in which it became a foundation of our universal recognition to essay genre and its nature.
참고문헌 (28)
- 조용만, "신춘소설총평―소설의 학대", 조선일보, 1933. 4. 26, ~ (1933)
- 김기림, "문단시평", 신동아 (1933)
- 민병휘, "수필문학의 유린에 대한 감상", 신동아, 23 (1933)
- 현동염, "수필문학에 대한 각서", 조선일보, 1933. 10. 21∼24, ~ (1933)
- "문학좌담회", 조선문학 (1933)
- 김광섭, "수필문학소고", 문학 (1934)
- 한세광, "수필문학론", 조선중앙일보, 1934.7, ~ (1934)
- 강한인, "엣세이(수필)와 문학", 조선일보, 1935. 5. 5∼7, ~ (1935)
- 김관, "수필과 비평", 조광 (1937)
- 임화, "수필론", 동아일보, 1938. 6.18, 19, 21, 22, ~ (1938)
- 최재서, "문학의 수필화", 동아일보, 1939. 2. 3, ~ (1939)
- 김진섭, "수필의 문학적 영역", 동아일보, 1939. 3.14, 23, ~ (1939)
- 이태준, "문장강화" (1940), 문장사
- 김동리, "문학개론", pp.91~ (1952), 정음사
- 김지영, "문학 개념체계의 계보학 – 산문 분류법의 변화과정을 중심으로", 민족문화연구, (51), pp.337~376 (2009), 민족문화연구원
- 김현, "한국문학사", pp.224~ (1974), 민음사
- 김현주, "1930년대 '수필' 개념의 구축 과정", 민족문학사연구, 22, pp.254~276 (2003), 민족문학사학회
- 김현주, "한국근대산문의 계보학", pp.223~ (2004), 소명출판
- 문혜윤, "‘수필’ 장르의 명칭과 형식의 수립 과정", 민족문화연구, (48), pp.127~150 (2008), 민족문화연구원
- 미셀 푸코, "성의 역사 1", pp.79~ (1990), 나남출판
- 손유경, "프로문학의 감성구조", pp.187~197 (2012), 소명출판
- 신재기, "김광섭의 수필론", 어문론총, (55), pp.415~440 (2011), 한국문학언어학회
- 신재기, "임화의 수필론 연구", 우리말글, 42, pp.279~303 (2008), 우리말글학회
- 이광수, "문학에 뜻을 두는 이에게", 개벽, (21) (1922)
- 임화, "낭만적 정신의 현실적 구조", 조선일보, 1934. 4.19∼25, ~ (1934)
- 蔣孔陽, "형상과 전형", pp.8~ (1987), 사계절
- 정주환, "수필문학 장르적 명칭과 정착 과정", 비평문학, (9) (1995)
- 조연현, "문학개론", pp.102~ (1953), 고려출판사