본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

최저가낙찰제 저가심사기준 도입효과 분석

Analysis on the Effect of the Two-Stage Rule for Judgment on Extremely Low Bidding Price in Lowest Bidding System

1

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This study analyzed the lowest bidding data of construction project bid in 2007 to investigate the effect of two stage rule for judgment on extremely low price bidding which has been introduced since May, 2006. Not only bidding rate, but also the order of bidder is considered in this analysis. On the surface the bidding rate of architectural engineering sector is lower and that of civil engineering sector higher by simple before/after analysis, but this study insists on both sector being better off. This study shows the effect of architectural sector is bigger than that of civil sector in terms of the bidding rate increase between the lowest bidding rate and the success bidder's bidding rate. Nevertheless the bidding rate of architectural is lower, because of the different competition environments and the lack of consideration on the different proportion of input between architectural and civil engineering project. In Conclusion the improvement of the current rule that adopt the criterion based on direct construction cost is suggested.

Abstract

This study analyzed the lowest bidding data of construction project bid in 2007 to investigate the effect of two stage rule for judgment on extremely low price bidding which has been introduced since May, 2006. Not only bidding rate, but also the order of bidder is considered in this analysis. On the surface the bidding rate of architectural engineering sector is lower and that of civil engineering sector higher by simple before/after analysis, but this study insists on both sector being better off. This study shows the effect of architectural sector is bigger than that of civil sector in terms of the bidding rate increase between the lowest bidding rate and the success bidder's bidding rate. Nevertheless the bidding rate of architectural is lower, because of the different competition environments and the lack of consideration on the different proportion of input between architectural and civil engineering project. In Conclusion the improvement of the current rule that adopt the criterion based on direct construction cost is suggested.

참고문헌 (11)

  1. 김성일, "최저가 낙찰제의 문제점과 개선방안", 건설경제, 통권 : 28 (2001), 국토연구원
  2. 대한건설협회, "최저가낙찰제 무엇이 문제이며 왜 폐지되어야 하는가? 대한건설협회 내부자료", ~ (2008)
  3. 백성준, "2000년 상반기 조달청 신규공공공사 발주 실태분석 건설산업동향" (2000), 한국건설산업연구원
  4. 백영권, "공공공사 최저가 입찰제도 현황과 대응전략" (2008), 정책세미나 국토교통뉴스
  5. 이상호, "최저가낙찰제 도입 및 정착방안연구" (2000), 한국건설산업연구원
  6. 이상호, "최저가 낙찰제 시행 성과와 과제" (2004), 한국건설산업연구원
  7. 이재식, "최저가낙찰제 운용현황 및 저가심사제 개선방안", 건설경제, 통권 : 50, pp.56~66 (2006), 국토연구원
  8. 이재우, "우리나라 입찰경쟁의 경제적 분석", 한국경제학회 학술대회, pp.123~142 (1992)
  9. 이형우, "최저가낙찰제하에서의 건설업체의 투찰행태 분석", 시공관리, 26(6), pp.975~983 (2006), 대한토목학회
  10. 진상화, "공공공사 입낙찰제도 현황과 개선방향" (2007), 현대건설내부자료
  11. 한국건설산업연구원, "입찰금액 적정성 심사기준 개선방안 연구" (2007), 한국건설산업연구원

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)