본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

‘明末小品’과 李贄散文의 ‘小品’적 특성 고찰

A study on the Xiaopin-style characteristics of ‘Late Ming Essays’ and Li Zhi's Proses

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

Abstract

If proses, which comprise most of modern writings, are western essays, ‘Xiaopin’ would be the equivalent of that for Chinese literature. Although ‘Xiaopin’ is less popular than main stream literary work such as poetry, novels and plays, the Chinese essay has not only greatly influenced China, but also Chosun. The prose influenced many Chosun writers such as Yeun-Am Pack Ji Won and was popular amongst various significant figures in the History of Korean-Chinse Literature. It later gave rise to the restoration of literary style. Afterwards, Xiaopin attracted attention in modern China by Lin yu-tang and Luxun’s Controversy of Xiaopin. The Late Ming Essays were a unique prose during the Ming Dynasty which was brought forward by the era's demands for the new. The characteristics of the content of the Late Ming Essays were the Pursuit of True Mind and Resistance whilst the characteristics of its form is that it was a free form of writing where there is a sense of humor or satire in the writing and that it may even use profane language. Although the Late Ming Essays are generally known to have begun during the Yuan Hong-da, this study sees Li Zhi's proses as its origin. This is because Li Zhi had directly affected and many of his literary characteristics conform to the characteristics of the Late Ming Essays. This study seeks to find Li Zhi as the writer who started a new style of writing and Li Zhi's phase as a Xiaopin writer in Chinese literature.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. 李  贄, "焚書 in:續焚書", 漢京文化事業有限公司
  2. 黃宗羲, "明儒學案" (1987), 華世出版社
  3. 李濟雨, "‘만명소품’의 문학이상", 中國學硏究, 30 (2004), 중국학연구회
  4. 李濟雨, "‘晩明小品’ 창작의 이론 배경과 실천", 중어중문학, 33, pp.441~470 (2003), 한국중어중문학회
  5. 李濟雨, "‘晩明小品’ 批評의 歷史", 중어중문학, 31, pp.287~310 (2002), 한국중어중문학회
  6. 李濟雨, "청대 『사고전서총목』을 통해 본 ‘만명소품’의 현상과 평가", 中國學硏究, 26 (2003), 중국학연구회
  7. 李濟雨, "1930년대 ‘소품문논쟁’을 통해서 본 만명소품의 인식과 평가", 中國學硏究, 18 (1996), 중국학연구회
  8. 李濟雨, "중국현대문학소위 ‘소품문’", 中國學硏究, 8 (1993), 중국학연구회
  9. 이제우, "16-7세기 간 중국 소품(문)과 서구 에세이의 초보형식 비교", 중국어문논역총간, 22(22), pp.143~171 (2008), 중국어문논역학회
  10. 金垠希, "論語派論爭에 關한 小考", 중국현대문학, (4) (1990), 한국중국현대문학학회
  11. 강명관, "문체와 국가장치: 정조의 문체반정을 둘러싼 사건들", 문학과경계, 통권 : 2 (2001), 문학과경계사
  12. 주호림, "中國資本主義 萌芽論爭에 關한 小考", 원우론집 (1985), 연세대학교
  13. 李进立, "晚明小品文述略", 河南师范大学学报 (2005), 哲学社会科学版
  14. 胡海琴, "晚明小品对传统散文的突破", 承德民族师专学报 (2008)
  15. 郭预衡, "李贽在中国散文史上的位置", 首都师范大学学报 (2000), 社会科学版
  16. 吴承学, "晚明小品研究心得-兼谈拙著『晚明小品研究" (2000), 古典文学知识
  17. 金聲振, "朝鮮後期小品體散文硏究", 박사, pp.1991
  18. 李鐘周, "北學派 散文 硏究", 박사, pp.1990
  19. 안대회, "조선후기 小品文의 실체" (2003), 태학사
  20. 풍우란, "중국철학사" (2002), 까치
  21. 배영동, "명말청초사상" (1992), 민음사
  22. 曺永祿, "中國 近世 知性의 理念과 運動" (2002), 지식산업사
  23. 김학주, "중국문학사" (2001), 신아사
  24. 김시준, "중국현대문학사" (2004), 지식산업사
  25. 黃卓越, "閒雅文人小品集觀-明淸文人小品家五十家上 in: 文娛序" (1996), 百花洲文藝出版社
  26. 林海權, "李贄年譜考略" (2005), 福建人民出版社

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (38건)