現 중국서예 流派 형성 動向
The trend of Chinese calligraphy shools
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Chinese calligraphy is developing fast as various schools have been formed. This thesis refers to the way Chinese calligraphy schools were formed, to the origin of them and to the features of respective school. First, the cause by which Chinese calligraphy schools were formed is as follows. One was the absence of apprenticeship because China concentrated on building socialism, ignoring the development of Chinese calligraphy. The other was to establish characteristic calligraphy world because Chinese calligraphy institute was founded early in 1980s and new power group of calligraphy emerged. Chinese calligraphy schools have consisted of Classicism , Neo-Classicism, Fashion style, Modernism, Post-Modernism, Academism because of above mentioned things. These schools of characteristics are as follows. First, Classicism tries to succeed to tradition rather than up to date trend. Though it have limits of persisting traditional calligraphy, it can be thought much of in the aspect of connecting modern times with the past. Second, Neo-Classicism reflects on contemporary needs and tides, at the same time, based on succeeding to tradition. Third, Fashion style is a kind of Neo-Classicism but the school having strong and unique characteristics in regard to emphasizing individuals. Fourth, Modernism has avant-garde tendency. It seeks to enlarge visual and time-space representative effect. Fifth, Post-Modernism is originated from reflection on Modernism' extreme attempt. It is the school formed by mixing Classicism, Neo-Classicism and external trend of literature. Sixth, Academism is new calligraphy school, accepting merits of Classicism, Neo-Classicism and Modernism all over, futhermore, studying with ideological concepts. Above mentioned, prevalence of schools formed with similar philosophy and concept means that Chinese calligraphy goes to the way of prosperity out of hesitating on the dividing line between success and failure.
Abstract
Chinese calligraphy is developing fast as various schools have been formed. This thesis refers to the way Chinese calligraphy schools were formed, to the origin of them and to the features of respective school. First, the cause by which Chinese calligraphy schools were formed is as follows. One was the absence of apprenticeship because China concentrated on building socialism, ignoring the development of Chinese calligraphy. The other was to establish characteristic calligraphy world because Chinese calligraphy institute was founded early in 1980s and new power group of calligraphy emerged. Chinese calligraphy schools have consisted of Classicism , Neo-Classicism, Fashion style, Modernism, Post-Modernism, Academism because of above mentioned things. These schools of characteristics are as follows. First, Classicism tries to succeed to tradition rather than up to date trend. Though it have limits of persisting traditional calligraphy, it can be thought much of in the aspect of connecting modern times with the past. Second, Neo-Classicism reflects on contemporary needs and tides, at the same time, based on succeeding to tradition. Third, Fashion style is a kind of Neo-Classicism but the school having strong and unique characteristics in regard to emphasizing individuals. Fourth, Modernism has avant-garde tendency. It seeks to enlarge visual and time-space representative effect. Fifth, Post-Modernism is originated from reflection on Modernism' extreme attempt. It is the school formed by mixing Classicism, Neo-Classicism and external trend of literature. Sixth, Academism is new calligraphy school, accepting merits of Classicism, Neo-Classicism and Modernism all over, futhermore, studying with ideological concepts. Above mentioned, prevalence of schools formed with similar philosophy and concept means that Chinese calligraphy goes to the way of prosperity out of hesitating on the dividing line between success and failure.
참고문헌 (25)
- 이영미, "마당극양식의 원리와 특성" (2001), 시공사
- 신승환, "포스트모더니즘에 대한 성찰" (2003), 살림
- 王岳川, "中國書法文化精神" (2003), 新星出版社
- 王岳川, "書法身份" (2008), 北京大學出版社
- 王岳川, "中外書法名家講演錄" (2008), 北京大學出版社
- 蔡一民, "从传统谈起──略论流行书体", 中国书法, ~ (2001)
- 余德泉, "书法通" (1999), 湖南大学出版社
- 周俊, "書法復興的尋繹" (2004), 河南美術出版社
- 周俊桀, "二十一世紀書法" (2001), 河南大學出版社
- 邱振中, "1979~1999年的中國書法-≪世紀之門-1979~1999中國藝術激請展≫書法部分總論", 韓中書藝專功敎授作品集, 梨花文化出版社, ~ (2001)
- 蘭 吉, "流行書風的內在特徵與形成原因", 西安航空技術高等專科學校學報, 27(4) (2009)
- 王 镛, "流行书风和新古典主义—王镛先生2002年答周俊杰先生书信回顾答周俊杰先生书", ~ (2002)
- 傅京生, "中国现代书法的类型及其它", 美术观察, (06) (1998)
- 庄希祖, "四宁四毋论与流行书风", 书法, (二) (1990)
- 高 远, "流行书风之再商榷", 书法, (2) (1992)
- 严学章, "书法文章-关于朋友与敌人", 书法研究, (4) (1993)
