‘동시적 CMC’와 ‘면대면’에서의 제 2 외국어 학습자들의 담화 구조 비교
A comparative analysis of ESL learners’ discourses in synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication and face-to-face communication
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The study aims to investigate how L2 discourses were different in computer-mediated communication (CMC) and face-to-face communication (FTF). Incorporating insights from social interactionist and discourse-analytic perspectives, the study investigated the conversations of Korean English teachers engaging in two activities: an information gap task and role playing, both common second language classroom activities. The results revealed that L2 discourse patterns constantly changed on their own in every activity, regardless of communication modes or activity types. This indicates that L2 practices were not singularly conditioned by the influences of a particular factor, and were rather constantly shaped by multiple factors and their relationships to each other. The results also showed that L2 learners tend to add more contextual information to their messages in CMC than in FTF. This is due to the lack of turn taking systems and visual cues in CMC which seemed to widen the intersubjective gap among the participants. In addition, it is also suggested that a large intersubjective gap in CMC made it difficult for L2 participants to pick up language skills or communication skills from their CMC experiences and apply them to their next practices.
Abstract
The study aims to investigate how L2 discourses were different in computer-mediated communication (CMC) and face-to-face communication (FTF). Incorporating insights from social interactionist and discourse-analytic perspectives, the study investigated the conversations of Korean English teachers engaging in two activities: an information gap task and role playing, both common second language classroom activities. The results revealed that L2 discourse patterns constantly changed on their own in every activity, regardless of communication modes or activity types. This indicates that L2 practices were not singularly conditioned by the influences of a particular factor, and were rather constantly shaped by multiple factors and their relationships to each other. The results also showed that L2 learners tend to add more contextual information to their messages in CMC than in FTF. This is due to the lack of turn taking systems and visual cues in CMC which seemed to widen the intersubjective gap among the participants. In addition, it is also suggested that a large intersubjective gap in CMC made it difficult for L2 participants to pick up language skills or communication skills from their CMC experiences and apply them to their next practices.
참고문헌 (38)
- Beauvois, M. H, "Computer-assisted classroom discussion in the foreign language classroom: Conversation in slow motion", Foreign Language Annals, 25(5), pp.455~464 (1992)
- Blake, R, "Computer mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage", Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), pp.120~136 (2000)
- Blake, R. J, "Who’s helping whom?: Learner", heritage-speakers’ networked discussions in Spanish, 2003, pp.24(4), 519~544
- Chun, D. M, "Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence", System, 22(1), pp.17~31 (1994)
- Coulthard, M, "Developing a description of spoken discourse, In Studies in discourse analysis" (1981), Routledge
- Cullen, R, "Supportive teacher talk: The importance of the F-move", ELT Journal, 56(2), pp.117~127 (2002)
- Fitze, M, "Discourse and participation in ESL face-to-face and written electronic conferences", Language Learning & Technology, 10(1), pp.67~86 (2006)
- Francis, F, "Analysing everyday conversation, In Advances in spoken discourse analysis" (1992), Routledge
- Garfinkel, H, "Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewoood Cliffs" (1967), Prentice Hall
- Hall, J. K, "Interaction as method and result of language learning", Language Teaching, 43(2), pp.202~215 (2010)
- Hardley, A. O, "Teaching language in context" (1993), Heinle & Heinle
- Jonathan, C, "Facilitator talk", ELT Journal, 60(2), pp.142~150 (2006)
- Kaufman, L. M., Jr, "Email keypals in zone of proximal development", Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (1998)
- Kelm, O. R, "The use of synchronous computer networks in second language instruction: A preliminary report", Foreign Language Annals, 25, pp.441~545 (1992)
- Kern, R. G, "Restructuring classroom interaction with network computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production", The Modern Language Journal, 79, pp.457~476 (1995)
- Kitade, K, "L2 learners’ discourse and SLA theories in CMC: Collaborative interaction in Internet chat", Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13(2), pp.143~166 (2000)
- Lee, L, "Online interaction: Negotiation of meaning and strategies used among learners of Spanish", ReCALL, 13(2), pp.232~244 (2001)
- Lee, L, "Synchronous online exchanges: A study of modification devices on non-native discourse", System, 30(3), pp.275~288 (2002)
- Marker, N, "Classroom talks: An introduction", the Modern Language Journal, 88(4), pp.491~500 (2004)
- Mondada, L, "Second language acquisition as situated practice: Task accomplishment in the French second language classroom", The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), pp.501~518 (2004)
- Ortegar, L, "Processes and outcomes in networked classroom interaction: Defining the research agenda for L2 computer-assisted classroom discussion", Language Learning & Technology, 1(1), pp.82~93 (1997)
- Pellettieri, J, "Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence, In Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice", pp.59~86 (2000), Cambridge University Press
- Sacks, H, "A simplest systematic for the organization of turn-taking for conversation", Language, 50, pp.696~735 (1974)
- Schegloff, E. A, "Between macro and micro: contexts and other connections, In The Micro-macro link", pp.207~234 (1987), University of California Press
- Sinclair, J. M, "Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils" (1975), Oxford University Press
- Skehan, P, "A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction", Applied Linguistics, 17(1), pp.38~62 (1996)
- Slatin, J, "The computer writing and research lab: A brief institutional history, In Language learning online: Theory and practice in the ESL and L2 computer classroom", pp.19~39 (1998), Labyrinth
- Smith, B, "Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model", The Modern Language Journal, 87(1), pp.38~57 (2003)
- Smith, B, "Computer-mediated negotiated interaction and lexical acquisition", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(3), pp.365~398 (2004)
- Sotillo, S. M, "Discourse functions and syntactic complexity in synchronous and asynchronous communication", Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), pp.82~119 (2000)
- Sullivan, N, "A comparative study of two ESL writing environments: A computer-assisted classroom and a traditional oral classroom", System, 29(4), pp.491~501 (1996)
- Toyoda, E, "Categorization of text chat communication between learners and native speakers of Japanese", Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), pp.82~99 (2002)
- Vandergriff, I, "Negotiating common ground in computer-mediated versus face-to-face discussions", Language Learning & Technology, 10(1), pp.110~138 (2006)
- Van Lier, L, "From input to affordance: social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective, In Sociocultural theory and second language learning" (2000), Oxford University Press
- Warschauer, M, "Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom", CALICO Journal, 13, pp.7~25 (1996)
- Widdowson, H. G, "Knowledge of language and ability for use", Applied Linguistics, 10(2), pp.128~137 (1989)
- Yanguas, I, "Oral computer-mediated interaction between L2 learners: It’s about time!", Language Learning & Technology, 14(3), pp.72~93 (2010)
- Young, R. F, "Learning as changing participation: Discourse roles in ESL writing conferences", The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), pp.519~535 (2004)
