본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

영어로 진행하는 영어수업에 대한 초등교사 및 학생들의 인식 조사

Perception of primary teachers and students on an English education policy in Korea, TEE

1

조회

0

다운로드

27

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The purpose of this study is to investigate the perception of primary teachers and students on an English education policy of Korea, teaching English through English (TEE). This study also investigates the associations among the variables of teachers (gender, English teaching experience as an English subject teacher or homeroom teacher, oversea training experience) and learners (gender, grade, private tutoring, oversea training/schooling experience). 91 primary teachers and 1351 students participated in this study. Questionnaires were used to collect the data. For the data analysis, multiple response, Crosstabs, and ANOVA were used. The results obtained were as followings; 1) There was an agreement between primary teachers and students in recognizing the necessity of TEE but a big gap in recognizing the concept of TEE. 2). Both teachers and students recognized the positive effects of TEE and the importance of English proficiency for the success in implementing TEE. 3) Both teachers and students considered a team teaching as an effective way to implement TEE in Korea. 4) The results mentioned above are associated with learners' variables more actively.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the perception of primary teachers and students on an English education policy of Korea, teaching English through English (TEE). This study also investigates the associations among the variables of teachers (gender, English teaching experience as an English subject teacher or homeroom teacher, oversea training experience) and learners (gender, grade, private tutoring, oversea training/schooling experience). 91 primary teachers and 1351 students participated in this study. Questionnaires were used to collect the data. For the data analysis, multiple response, Crosstabs, and ANOVA were used. The results obtained were as followings; 1) There was an agreement between primary teachers and students in recognizing the necessity of TEE but a big gap in recognizing the concept of TEE. 2). Both teachers and students recognized the positive effects of TEE and the importance of English proficiency for the success in implementing TEE. 3) Both teachers and students considered a team teaching as an effective way to implement TEE in Korea. 4) The results mentioned above are associated with learners' variables more actively.

참고문헌 (41)

  1. 고정민, "교수방법과 TETE 수업을 중심으로 살펴본 중학교 영어교육", Foreign Languages Education, 15(1), pp.383~407 (2008), 한국외국어교육학회
  2. 교육인적자원부, "영어교육 활성화 5개년 종합대책" (2005), 교육인적자원부
  3. 교육인적자원부, "국민의 영어 역량 제고를 위한 영어교육 혁신방안.교육인적자원부 정책 참고 자료집" (2006), 교육인적자원부
  4. 교육인적자원부, "참여정부의 방과후학교 성과보고" (2007), 교육인적자원부
  5. 김미형, "원어수업이 학업성취도와 정의적 태도에 미치는 영향 : 초등학교 4학년을 대상으로", 초등영어교육, 13(2), pp.143~166 (2007), 한국초등영어교육학회
  6. 김성연, "영어로 진행하는 영어수업에 대한 초등교사의 태도", 초등영어교육, 8(2), pp.5~30 (2002), 한국초등영어교육학회
  7. 김신혜, "원어민 교사 프로그램이 고등학교 영어교육에 미치는 영향", Foreign Languages Education, 9(3), pp.211~241 (2002), 한국외국어교육학회
  8. 김혜영, "Classroom English의 활용을 통한 영어 듣기기능 향상에 관한연구" (2002), 서울특별시 교육청
  9. 노경희, "Primary English teaching by principles of second language", 초등영어교육, 6(1), pp.5~29 (2000)
  10. 문영인, "영어로 진행하는 영어수업(TETE)에 관한 중학교 영어 교사들의 인식 조사", 영어교육연구, 14(2), pp.299~324 (2002), 팬코리아영어교육학회
  11. 박상옥, "영어교육에서 교실 영어사용의 효과", 영어교육, 51(1), pp.3~21 (1996)
  12. 방영주, "효율적인 원어민 영어교사 자질에 대한 인식", 현대영어교육, 8(3), pp.341~365 (2007), 현대영어교육학회
  13. 삼성연구소, "영어의 경제학" (2006), 삼성연구소
  14. "경기교육청, ‘교내미니영어마을’영어사용강화. 뉴시스"[URL]
  15. 윤유진, "영어 원어민 강사 운영 실태 및 직무 만족도 연구: 방과후학교 프로그램을 중심으로", 현대영어교육, 8(3), pp.152~188 (2008), 현대영어교육학회
  16. 이완기, "초등영어교육론" (2000), 문진미디어
  17. 황진영, "대졸 입사자 영어회화 낙제점. 동아일보, 10월 21일", 13A~ (2006)
  18. Atkimson, D., "Teaching monolingual classes" (1993), Longman
  19. Auerbach, E., "Reexamining English only in the ESL classroom", TESOL Quarterly, 27(1), pp.9~32 (1993)
  20. Boo, Kyung-Soon, "Classroom language in teaching English", Korea, 14(1), pp.23~42 (1998)
  21. Brown, H. D., "Teaching by principles" (1994), Prentice-Hall
  22. Cook, V., "Using the first language in the classroom", Canadian Modern Language Review, 57(3), pp.402~423 (2001)
  23. Cunningham, L., "Team teaching: Where do we stand?", Administrator's Notebook, 8, pp.1~4 (1960)
  24. D'Annunzio, A., "Using bilingual tutors and non-directive approaches in ESL: A follow-up report", Connections: A Journal of Adult Literacy, 4, pp.51~52 (1991)
  25. Friedlander, A., "Composing in English: Effects of a first language on writing in English in a second language In: Second language writing", pp.109~125 (1990), Cambridge University Press
  26. Friend, M., "Co-teaching: An overview of ten past, a glimpse at the present, and considerations for the future", Preventing School Failure, 37(4), pp.6~11 (1993)
  27. Garcia, E., "Education of linguistically and culturally diverse students: Effective instructional practices" (1991), National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning
  28. Gass, S., "Input and interaction In: The handbook of second language acquisition", pp.224~255 (2003), Blackwell
  29. Gass, S., "The role of input and interaction in second language acquisition", Modern Language Journal, 82, pp.299~307 (1998)
  30. Gonzales, G., "Advances in research in bilingual education. Directions in language & education, 1(5)" (1995), Department of Education, National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education
  31. Sung-AeKim, "A Critical Reflection on the ‘Teaching English Through English’ Classes in the Korean Context", 영어교육, 57(4), pp.315~346 (2002), 한국영어교육학회
  32. Klassen, C., "Bilingual written language use by low-education Latin American new comers In: Writing in the community", pp.38~57 (1991), Sage
  33. Krashen, S., "The input hypothesis: Issues and implication" (1985), Longman
  34. Kwon, Oryang, "Korea's English education policy changes in the 1990s: Innovations to gear the nation for the 21st century", English Teaching, 55(1), pp.47~91 (2000)
  35. Long, M., "Input and second language acquisition In: Input in second language acquisition", pp.377~393 (1985), Newbury
  36. Phillipson, R., "Linguistic imperialism" (1992), Oxford University Press
  37. Rosenthal, A., "A communicative approach to foreign language instruction: The UMBC project", Foreign Language Annals, 20, pp.245~253 (1984)
  38. Snow, C., "Rationales for native language instruction: Evidence from research In: Bilingual education: Issues and strategies", pp.60~74 (1990), Sage
  39. Swain, M., "Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development In: Input in second language acquisition", pp.235~253 (1985), Newbury
  40. Swain, M., "The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren't enough", The Canadian Modern Language Review, 50, pp.158~164 (1993)
  41. Swain, M., "Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning", Applied Linguistics, 16, pp.371~391 (1995)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)