L2 Reading Strategies Reconsidered: Variation in Strategy Use as a Function of Task Type and Elicitation Device
2
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper examines whether and how L2 learners’ reading strategies vary depending on the task type or on the measure of eliciting strategy use. Participants were 28 college students in a Korean university. Two reading tasks (i.e., reading for comprehension vs. reading for summarizing) and three measures of strategy use (i.e., pre-reading strategy survey, while-reading think aloud, and post-reading strategy check list) were employed to answer the posed research questions. The researcher’s observation of the participants’ thinking-aloud and a post-task interview were also implemented for data triangulation. All the participants completed two tasks based on two texts (one for each) selected from the same chapter in a book that were considered equivalent in length, readability, and topic. The results revealed that the number of reading strategies reported decreased dramatically in the order of strategy survey, strategy check list, and think aloud. Significantly more frequent use of reading strategy was found in reading for comprehension than in reading for summarizing, large portion of which was devoted to bottom-up style decoding, while in reading for summarizing the students approached the text with more focused attention caring about propositional connections at discourse level. Some other findings are presented along with implications for reading research and for L2 reading instruction.
Abstract
This paper examines whether and how L2 learners’ reading strategies vary depending on the task type or on the measure of eliciting strategy use. Participants were 28 college students in a Korean university. Two reading tasks (i.e., reading for comprehension vs. reading for summarizing) and three measures of strategy use (i.e., pre-reading strategy survey, while-reading think aloud, and post-reading strategy check list) were employed to answer the posed research questions. The researcher’s observation of the participants’ thinking-aloud and a post-task interview were also implemented for data triangulation. All the participants completed two tasks based on two texts (one for each) selected from the same chapter in a book that were considered equivalent in length, readability, and topic. The results revealed that the number of reading strategies reported decreased dramatically in the order of strategy survey, strategy check list, and think aloud. Significantly more frequent use of reading strategy was found in reading for comprehension than in reading for summarizing, large portion of which was devoted to bottom-up style decoding, while in reading for summarizing the students approached the text with more focused attention caring about propositional connections at discourse level. Some other findings are presented along with implications for reading research and for L2 reading instruction.
참고문헌 (49)
- Afflerbach, P, "The influence of prior knowledge on expert readers’ main idea construction strategies", Reading Research Quarterly, 25(1), pp.31~46 (1990)
- Alderson, J. C., "Assessing reading" (2000), Cambridge University Press
- Alexander, P. A., "A perspective on strategy research: Progress and prospects", Educational Psychology Review, 10(2), pp.129~154 (1998)
- Anderson, N., "Individual differences in strategy use in second language reading and testing", Modern Language Journal, 75, pp.460~472 (1991)
- Anderson, N., "Exploring second language reading: Issues and strategies" (1999), Heinle & Heinle
- Barnet, M. A., "Reading through context: How real and perceived strategy use affects L2 comprehension", Modern Language Journal, 72, pp.150~160 (1988)
- Bransford, J. D., "Human cognition" (1979), Wadsworth
- Brantmeier, C., "The relationship between readers’ gender, passage content, comprehension and strategy use in reading Spanish as a secondlanguage", 박사, pp.2000
- Brantmeier, C., "Second language reading strategy research at the secondary and university levels: Variations, disparities, and generalizability", The Reading Matrix, 2(2), pp.1~14 (2002)
- Carrell, P. L., "Metacognitive awareness and second language reading", Modern Language Journal, 73, pp.121~133 (1989)
- Chamot, A. U., "Issues in language learning strategy research and teaching", Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Studies, 1(1), pp.14~26 (2004)
- Chamot, A. U., "Language learning strategy instruction : Current issues and research", Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, pp.112~130 (2005)
- Chin, Cheong-Sook, "Korean college ESL readers’ metacognitive awareness and preferences about reading in English", English Teaching, 52(3), pp.83~101 (1997)
- Ericsson, K. A., "Protocol analysis : Verbal reports as data" (1993), MIT Press
- Green, A., "Verbal protocol analysis in language testing research : A handbook" (1998), Cambridge University Press
- SoonaiHam, "The Self-Efficacy Model of Language Learning Strategy and EFL Reading Achievement", 영어교육, 57(1), pp.111~130 (2002), 한국영어교육학회
- Hardin, V. B., "Transfer and variation in cognitive reading strategies of Latino fourth-grade students in a late-exit bilingual program", Bilingual Research Journal, 25(4), pp.539~561 (2001)
- 조정순, "What Happens When L2 Readers Recall?", 어학연구, 42(1), pp.205~238 (2006), 언어교육원
- Johnston, P. H., "Reading assessment: A cognitive basis" (1983), International Reading Association
- Koda, K., "Insights into second language reading" (2005), Cambridge University Press
- Jeong-WonLee, "An Exploratory Study on Reading Comprehension Test-Taking Processes and Strategies in the EFL Context", 영어교육, 57(4), pp.177~195 (2002), 한국영어교육학회
- Lee, Jeong-Won, "A Study on English Reading Test-taking Strategies", 영어교육, 59(4), pp.145~166 (2004), 한국영어교육학회
- 이정원, "영어 읽기 시험-수행 전략 사용에 관한 사례 연구", 영어교육연구, 17(2), pp.179~201 (2005), 팬코리아영어교육학회
- Lee, Kyoung-Rang, "Triangulating Think-alouds and Questionnaires in Reading Strategy Assessment: An Exploratory Study", 영어교육, 62(3), pp.331~356 (2007), 한국영어교육학회
- Maarof, N, "Assessing second-language reading" (1998), Faculty of Language Studies
- Maeng, Unkyoung, "How Are Reading Strategies Used in Different Reading Stages?", 영어교육, 61(1), pp.185~204 (2006), 한국영어교육학회
- 모슬기, "한국 중•고등학교 영어 학습자들의 성격 유형에 따른 영어 독해전략 연구", 영어어문교육, 15(4), pp.291~311 (2009), 한국영어어문교육학회
- Mokhtari, K., "Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies", Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, pp.249~259 (2002)
- Mokhtari, K., "Measuring ESL students’ awareness of reading strategies", Journal of Developmental Education, 25, pp.2~10 (2002)
- Oh, Junil, "A study on EFL reading instruction: Practice and its effects", Foreign Languages Education, 4(1), pp.67~89 (1998)
- Oxford, R., "Effect of the presence and difficulty of task on strategy use: An exploratory study", International Review of Applied Linguistics, 42, pp.1~47 (2004)
- Park, Young-Ye, "Self-regulated strategy training in second language reading: Its effects on reading comprehension, strategy use, reading attitudes, and learning styles of university ESL students", Foreign Languages Education, 2(1), pp.59~80 (1996)
- Park, Young-Ye, "Development of an instrument for assessing ESL reading strategies", Foreign Languages Education, 5(1), pp.231~254 (1998)
- Phakiti, A., "A closer look at the relationship of cognitive and metacognitive strategy use to EFL reading achievement test performance", Language Testing, 20(1), pp.26~56 (2003)
- Pritchard, R., "The effects of cultural schemata on reading processing strategies", Reading Research Quarterly, 25, pp.273~295 (1990)
- Pritchard, R., "Reading in Spanish and English : A comparative study of processing strategies", Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 51(8), pp.630~638 (2008)
- Raymond, T. M., "The effects of structure strategy training on the recall of expository prose for university students reading French as a second language", Modern Language Journal, 77, pp.445~458 (1993)
- Russo, J. E., "The validity of verbal protocol", Memory and Cognition, 17, pp.759~769 (1989)
- Schueller, J., "The effects of two types of strategic training on foreign language reading comprehension: An analysis by gender and proficiency", 박사, pp.1999
- Shah, P. M., "Comparing reading processing strategies of second language readers", American Journal of Applied Sciences, 7(1), pp.140~144 (2010)
- Sheorey, R., "Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers", System, 29, pp.431~449 (2001)
- Singhal, M., "Reading proficiency, reading strategies, metacognitive awareness and L2 readers", The Reading Matrix, 1(1), pp.1~9 (2001)
- Song, Heeshim, "The effect of the College Scholastic Ability Test on Korean college students’ reading processes and their perceptions of reading in English", English Teaching, 53(4), pp.265~290 (1998)
- Song, Mi-Jeong., "Reading strategies and second language reading ability : The magnitude of the relationship", English Teaching, 54(3), pp.73~95 (1999)
- Swaffar, J. K., "Reading for meaning : An integrated approach to language learning. Englewood Cliffs" (1991), Prentice Hall
- Tercanlioglu, L., "Postgraduate Students’ use of Reading Strategies in L1 and ESL contexts : Links to success", International Education Journal, 5, pp.562~570 (2004)
- Vollmeyer, R., "The impact of goal specificity on strategy use and the acquisition of problem structure", Cognitive Science, 20(1), pp.75~100 (1996)
- Young, D. J., "A gender-related analysis of strategies used to processinput in the native language and a foreign language", Applied Language Learning, 8, pp.42~73 (1997)
- Zhang, L. J., "Awareness in reading : EFL students' metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies in an acquisition-poor environment", Language Awareness, 10(4), pp.268~288 (2001)