본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Collaborative to Individual Writing: An Investigation of Student Performance and Perceptions

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This study investigates how English as a foreign language (EFL) learners progress from collaborative writing to individual writing in terms of accuracy, complexity, and fluency. Previous research on collaborative writing has focused on comparisons between learners who worked in pairs or groups with learners who worked individually. However, no research to date has explored the same learners’ experiences of collaborative and individual writing and their written products. In order to better understand the effects of this phenomenon, the current study compares the collaborative and individual written texts of 15 Korean EFL learners and, focusing on four students, also explores how learners’ perceptions and attitudes towards collaborative writing affect their actual writing. The analysis reveals that, in overall, learners’ writing improved through the experiences of collaborative writing. Also, students who produced higher quality individual works than collaborative had more positive views on collaborative writing than those who produced lower quality writing individually. The results of this study imply that collaborative writing can be beneficial in second language contexts and that instructors should inform students of its benefits to ensure students take advantage of the collaborative writing experience.

Abstract

This study investigates how English as a foreign language (EFL) learners progress from collaborative writing to individual writing in terms of accuracy, complexity, and fluency. Previous research on collaborative writing has focused on comparisons between learners who worked in pairs or groups with learners who worked individually. However, no research to date has explored the same learners’ experiences of collaborative and individual writing and their written products. In order to better understand the effects of this phenomenon, the current study compares the collaborative and individual written texts of 15 Korean EFL learners and, focusing on four students, also explores how learners’ perceptions and attitudes towards collaborative writing affect their actual writing. The analysis reveals that, in overall, learners’ writing improved through the experiences of collaborative writing. Also, students who produced higher quality individual works than collaborative had more positive views on collaborative writing than those who produced lower quality writing individually. The results of this study imply that collaborative writing can be beneficial in second language contexts and that instructors should inform students of its benefits to ensure students take advantage of the collaborative writing experience.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. Anton, M, "Socio-cognitive functions of L1 collaborative interaction in the L2 classroom", The Canadian Modern Language Review, 54(3), pp.314~342 (1998)
  2. DiCamilla, F. J, "Repetition in the collaborative discourse of L2 learners: A Vygotskian perspective", The Canadian Modern Language Review, 53(4), pp.609~633 (1997)
  3. Dobao, A. F, "Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair, and individual work", Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(1), pp.40~58 (2012)
  4. Donato, R, "Collective scaffolding in second language learning, In Vygotskian approaches to second language research", pp.33~56 (1994), Ablex
  5. Donato, R, "Aspects of collaboration in pedagogical discourse", Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24(1), pp.284~302 (2004)
  6. Ellis, R, "The study of second language acquisition" (1994), Oxford University Press
  7. Foster, P, "The influence of planning and task type on second language performance", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(30), pp.299~323 (1996)
  8. Kim, Youjin, "The contribution of collaborative and individual tasks to the acquisition of L2 vocabulary", The Modern Language Journal, 92(1), pp.114~130 (2008)
  9. Kuiken, F, "The effect of interaction in acquiring the grammar of a second language", International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3), pp.343~358 (2002)
  10. Leki, I, "‘A narrow thinking system’: Nonnative-English-speaking students in group projects across the curriculum", TESOL Quarterly, 35(1), pp.39~67 (2001)
  11. Long, M. H, "Native speaker", non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input, 1983, pp.4(2), 126~141
  12. Long, M. H, "The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition, In Handbook of language acquisition Vol. 2: Second Language acquisition", pp.446~465 (1996), Academic Press
  13. Nassaji, H, "Collaborative and individual output tasks and their effects on learning English phrasal verbs", Language Teaching Research, 14(4), pp.397~419 (2010)
  14. Ohta, A, "Applying sociocultural theory to an analysis of learner discourse: Learner-learner collaborative interaction in the zone of proximal development", Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6(2), pp.93~121 (1995)
  15. Ohta, A, "Rethinking interaction in SLA: Developmentally appropriate assistant in the zone of proximal development and the acquisition of L2 grammar, In Sociocultural theory and second language learning", pp.51~78 (2000), Oxford University Press
  16. Schmidt, R, "The role of consciousness in second language learning", Applied Linguistics, 11(2), pp.192~196 (1990)
  17. Attention and awareness in foreign language learning , In Attention and awareness in foreign language learning, "Schmidt, R", University of Hawaii Press, 1~64, pp.Technical report no. 9 (1994)
  18. Storch, N, "Patters of interaction in ESL pair work", Language Learning, 52(1), pp.119~158 (2002)
  19. Storch, N, "Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections", Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), pp.153~173 (2005)
  20. Storch, N, "Writing tasks: The effects of collaboration, In Investigating tasks in formal language learning", pp.157~177 (2007), Multilingual Matters
  21. Strauss, P, "‘I’d rather vomit up a live hedgehog’—L2 students and group assessment in mainstream university programs", Prospect, 16(2), pp.55~66 (2001)
  22. Swain, M, "The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue, In Sociocultural theory and second language learning", pp.97~114 (2000), Oxford University Press
  23. Swain, M, "Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together", Modern Language Journal, 82(3), pp.320~337 (1998)
  24. Vygotsky, L. S, "Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes" (1978), Harvard University Press
  25. Wigglesworth, G, "Pair versus individual writing: Effects on fluency, complexity and accuracy", Language Testing, 26(3), pp.445~466 (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)