본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

이슬람과 불교의 죽음이해에 대한 비교연구: 꾸란과 숫타니파타를 중심으로

A Comparative Study on the Idea of Death in Islam and Buddhism: With Reference of Qur'an and Suttanipata

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류종교학

초록

World religions teach us how to encounter death and to deal with it. Both Islam and Buddhism draw religious maps of imagination by which their believers can overcome the anger of death and endure the uncertainty in the future. Suicide is a sin to Islam and it is the nonviolent cessation of self which can be justified in Buddhism. This paper will examine the idea of death in Islam and Buddhism by analyzing the Qur'an and Suttanipatta from the perspective of phenomenology of religion. Islamic idea of death is based on Sharia law,mainly the Qur'an and Hadith. Buddhist idea of death comes from the early Buddhist scriptures like Suttanipatta and Dhammapada. First, Muslims regard death as Allah's plan. Since Allah gives all human beings different spans of life, people cannot complain about His plan. Therefore, Muslims should pray to Allah while they are living in this world. After death, people will be divided into two groups for heaven and hell according to their good actions. The quick burial of body in Islamic funeral indicates that Muslims believe in the physical resurrection of the dead on the Day of Judgment. Second, Buddhists regard death as the limitation of humanity. A form of new life starts after the death within the permanent circle of birth and death. In Buddhism, the eternal life is thought as a curse to be overcome. In order to reach the stage of liberation, People should learn Buddha's teaching and practice His wisdom through study and meditation. Buddhism denies the concept of self, so the true self seeks for the peace of mind beyond this life. Like Hinduism, the creation funeral is popular among the Buddhists. In conclusion, both Islam and Buddhism have different ideas of death. Islam emphasizes Allah's judgment after death, while Buddhism points out the great liberation beyond the circle of life and death. They both suggests us the paradigm shift from ego-centrism to Reality-centrism. In spite of huge gaps between monotheistic Islam and atheistic Buddhism, they share the common value of peace and nonviolence with each other.

Abstract

World religions teach us how to encounter death and to deal with it. Both Islam and Buddhism draw religious maps of imagination by which their believers can overcome the anger of death and endure the uncertainty in the future. Suicide is a sin to Islam and it is the nonviolent cessation of self which can be justified in Buddhism. This paper will examine the idea of death in Islam and Buddhism by analyzing the Qur'an and Suttanipatta from the perspective of phenomenology of religion. Islamic idea of death is based on Sharia law,mainly the Qur'an and Hadith. Buddhist idea of death comes from the early Buddhist scriptures like Suttanipatta and Dhammapada. First, Muslims regard death as Allah's plan. Since Allah gives all human beings different spans of life, people cannot complain about His plan. Therefore, Muslims should pray to Allah while they are living in this world. After death, people will be divided into two groups for heaven and hell according to their good actions. The quick burial of body in Islamic funeral indicates that Muslims believe in the physical resurrection of the dead on the Day of Judgment. Second, Buddhists regard death as the limitation of humanity. A form of new life starts after the death within the permanent circle of birth and death. In Buddhism, the eternal life is thought as a curse to be overcome. In order to reach the stage of liberation, People should learn Buddha's teaching and practice His wisdom through study and meditation. Buddhism denies the concept of self, so the true self seeks for the peace of mind beyond this life. Like Hinduism, the creation funeral is popular among the Buddhists. In conclusion, both Islam and Buddhism have different ideas of death. Islam emphasizes Allah's judgment after death, while Buddhism points out the great liberation beyond the circle of life and death. They both suggests us the paradigm shift from ego-centrism to Reality-centrism. In spite of huge gaps between monotheistic Islam and atheistic Buddhism, they share the common value of peace and nonviolence with each other.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. 냐나틸로카, "붓다의 말씀" (2002), 고요한 소리
  2. 법정, "숫타니파타" (2006), 이레
  3. 법정, "진리의 말씀: 법구경" (2006), 이레
  4. 법정, "무소유" (1976), 범우사
  5. 서정민, "이슬람 전통 따른 파우드 사우디 국왕 장례식", 중앙일보, ~ (2005)
  6. 손주영, "이슬람 전통에서의 삶과 내세관", 한국이슬람학회논총, 18(1), pp.1~31 (2008), 한국이슬람학회
  7. 안신, "세계종교의 이해: 전통들과 신앙" (2010), 배재대출판부
  8. 요한슨 루네, "초기 불교의 역동적 심리학" (2006), 경희대학교 출판국
  9. 이원삼, "이슬람 윤리관 -인간론을 중심으로", 한국이슬람학회논총, 17(2), pp.1~30 (2007), 한국이슬람학회
  10. 최영길, "무함마드 언행록을 통해 본 다양한 이슬람 이야기, 제 5권" (2009), 알림
  11. 최영길, "무함마드 언행록을 통해 본 다양한 이슬람 이야기, 제 3권" (2008), 알림
  12. 최영길, "무함마드 언행록을 통해 본 다양한 이슬람 이야기, 제 2권" (2008), 알림
  13. 알 마디나, "성 꾸란: 의미의 한국어 번역" (2001), 파하드국왕 성 꾸란 출판청
  14. 칼루파하나, 데이비드, "불교철학" (1992), 천지
  15. Ally, Mashuq ibn, "Islam, In Ethical Issues in Six Religious Traditions" (1996), Edinburgh University Press
  16. Arberry, John, "The Koran Interpreted" (1996), Touchstone Book
  17. Coward, Harold, "Pluralism: Challenge to World Religions" (1985), Orbis Press
  18. Durkheim, Emil, "Suicide: A Study in Sociology" (1952), Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd
  19. Esposito, John L, "Islam: The Straight Way" (1998), Oxford University Press
  20. Rahula, Walpola, "What the Buddha Taught" (1959), Gordon Frazer
  21. Morgan, Peggy, "Testing the Global Ethic" (1998), IIC & WCF
  22. Morgan, Peggy, "Buddhism, In Ethical Issues in Six Religious Traditions" (1996), Edinburgh University Press
  23. Neumaier-Dargyay, Eva K, "Buddhism, In Life after Death in World Religions" (2000), Orbis Press
  24. "Authentic Step by Step Illustrated Janazah Guide"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)