본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Recognition and Production of English Conventional Expressions in Relation to Academic Achievement

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This study aims to examine how EFL learners’ recognition and production of English conventional expressions are related to their overall English language learning achievement as measured by course grades. To this end, this study employed a recognition task and a production task implemented by 126 Korean and international university students. Analysis of individual conventional expressions showed that higher-level students scored much higher than their lower-level counterparts in recognizing 12 of 13 conventional expressions. Higherlevel students also demonstrated a greater production ability than their lower-level counterparts in 8 of 13 expressions. The higher-level students’ superiority to lower-level students was confirmed by their overall recognition and production scores. Another noticeable finding was that learners performed better on the recognition task than on the production task regardless of their language achievement levels. Closer examination revealed that there was a positive relationship between recognition and production of conventional expressions for the total number of students and for lower-level students. Based on these results, this study provides helpful suggestions for enhancing pragmatic knowledge of conventional expressions.

Abstract

This study aims to examine how EFL learners’ recognition and production of English conventional expressions are related to their overall English language learning achievement as measured by course grades. To this end, this study employed a recognition task and a production task implemented by 126 Korean and international university students. Analysis of individual conventional expressions showed that higher-level students scored much higher than their lower-level counterparts in recognizing 12 of 13 conventional expressions. Higherlevel students also demonstrated a greater production ability than their lower-level counterparts in 8 of 13 expressions. The higher-level students’ superiority to lower-level students was confirmed by their overall recognition and production scores. Another noticeable finding was that learners performed better on the recognition task than on the production task regardless of their language achievement levels. Closer examination revealed that there was a positive relationship between recognition and production of conventional expressions for the total number of students and for lower-level students. Based on these results, this study provides helpful suggestions for enhancing pragmatic knowledge of conventional expressions.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. Alcón-Soler, E., "Learning pragmatic routines during study abroad: A focus on proficiency and type of routines", ATLANTIS, 39(2), pp.191~210 (2017)
  2. Allen, D., "The impact of second language proficiency in dyadic peer feedback", Language Teaching Research, 20(4), pp.1~16 (2014)
  3. Bardovi-Harlig, K, "Understanding second language process", pp.205~222 (2008), Multilingual Matters
  4. Bardovi-Harlig, K., "Conventional expressions as a pragmalinguistic resource: Recognition and production of conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics", Language Learning, 59(4), pp.755~795 (2009)
  5. Bardovi-Harlig, K., "Pragmatics and language learning Vol. 12", pp.141~162 (2010), University of Hawaii, National Foreign Language Resource Center
  6. Bardovi-Harlig, K., "Formulas, routines, and conventional expressions in pragmatics research", Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, pp.206~227 (2012)
  7. Bardovi-Harlig, K., "Awareness of meaning of conventional expressions in second language pragmatics", Language Awareness, 23(1-2), pp.41~56 (2014)
  8. Bardovi-Harlig, K, "Language learning, discourse and cognition in the tradition of Andrea Tyler", pp.193~211 (2018), John Benjamins
  9. Bardovi-Harlig, K., "Proficiency, length of stay, and intensity of interaction and the acquisition of conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics", Intercultural Pragmatics, 8(3), pp.347~384 (2011)
  10. Bardovi-Harlig, K., "Pragmatics and language learning Vol. 12", pp.163~186 (2010), University of Hawaii, National Foreign Language Resource Center
  11. Bardovi-Harlig, K., "The effect of instruction on pragmatic routines in academic discussion", Language Teaching Research, 19(3), pp.324~350 (2015)
  12. Bardovi-Harlig, K., "The use of conventional expressions of thanking, apologizing, and refusing", Selected Proceedings of the 2007Second Language Research Forum, pp.113~130 (2007)
  13. Bardovi-Harlig, K., "The effect of learning environment on the selection of conventional expressions on an aural multiple-choice DCT", TESL-EJ, 25(1), pp.1~27 (2021)
  14. Barron, A, "Acquisition in interlanguage pragmatics:Learning how to do things with words in a study abroad context" (2003), John Benjamins
  15. Blum-Kulka, S., "Too many words:Length of utterance and pragmatic failure", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 8(2), pp.165~180 (1986)
  16. Cohen, A. D., "Teaching pragmatics in the second language classroom", The European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL, 1(1), pp.35~49 (2012)
  17. DeBoer, A, "Second language learners’ recognition and production of conventional expressions: The role of proficiency, length of stay, and intensity of interaction", master, pp.2015
  18. Habok, A., "Investigating the relationship among English language learning strategies, language achievement, and attitude", Frontiers in Psychology, 13, pp.1~9 (2022)
  19. Harsch, C., "Proficiency", ELT Journal, 71(2), pp.250~253 (2017)
  20. House, J., "Developing pragmatic fluency in English as a foreign language: Routines and metapragmatic awareness", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(2), pp.225~252 (1996)
  21. Kecskes, I., "Conceptual fluency and the use of situation-bound utterances", Links & Letters, 7, pp.145~161 (2000)
  22. Kepner, C. G., "An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second-language writing skills", Modern Language Journal, 75(3), pp.305~313 (1991)
  23. MacDonald, M., "How language production shapes language form and comprehension", Frontiers in Psychology, 26, pp.1~16 (2013)
  24. 박유정, "Pragma-Linguistic Differences in Korean EFL Student Productions of Conventional Expressions", 영어교육, 71(4), pp.3~26 (2016), 한국영어교육학회[DOI]
  25. Pawlak, M., "Grammar learning strategies as a key to mastering second language grammar: A research agenda", Language Teaching, 53(3), pp.358~370 (2020)
  26. Pintrich, P. R., "Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance", Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), pp.33~40 (1990)
  27. Roever, C, "Testing ESL pragmatics: Development and validation of a web-based assessment battery" (2005), Peter Lang
  28. Roever, C., "What learners get for free: Learning of routine formulae in ESL and EFL environments", ELT Journal, 66(1), pp.10~21 (2012)
  29. Sánchez-Hernández, A., "Pragmatic gains in the study abroad context: Learners’ experiences and recognition of pragmatic routines", Journal of Pragmatics, 146(1), pp.54~71 (2018)
  30. Sánchez-Hernández, A., "Investigating the learning of pragmatics across ages and contexts", pp.141~164 (2019), Brill
  31. 신유경, "Semantic Properties of Lexical Bundles Used by Young Adult Korean EFL Students at Different Grade Levels", 현대영어교육, 23(2), pp.10~21 (2022), 현대영어교육학회[DOI]
  32. Taguchi, N., "Corpus-informed assessment of L2 comprehension of conversational implicature", TESOL Quarterly, 43(4), pp.738~749 (2009)
  33. Taguchi, N., "Production of routines in L2 English:Effect of proficiency and study-abroad experience", System, 41(1), pp.109~121 (2013)
  34. Tajeddin, Z., "Acquisition of pragmatic routines by learners of L2 English:Investigating common errors and sources of pragmatic fossilization", TESL-EJ, 21(2), pp.1~21 (2017)
  35. Winne, P. H., "The psychology of academic achievement", Annual Review of Psychology, 61, pp.653~678 (2010)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)