본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Concepts of Conquest and Occupation: Different views of the Muslim rule in Iberian Peninsula

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류종교학

초록

In the past era, earlier before establishing the modern international law and the United Nations, both conquest and military occupation were worldwide happening all over the world. This includes the period of the existence of Islamic power in the Iberian Peninsula, which some describe as an occupation of other countries territories, while others describe it as a conquest for those territories. However, the word ‘conquest’ almost disappeared on describing wars for long time but reappeared in some news about wars of recent era, while the word ‘occupation’ continued and did not disappear from our modern world. Approaching the two concepts and explaining the similarity and difference between them can clarify the indications of applying each concept and the intentions behind this. In Arabic language, the language of Muslims holy book of Quran, the indication for the two concepts of ‘conquest’ and ‘occupation’ is totally different, in a way that many arguments can arouse to prove which of the two concepts give the right description for some cases. However, both of the two concepts have similarity in meaning on the point that both of them refer to an action using the force (usually military force) to control another country. In Arabic the difference indications of the two concepts is very obvious to show that one has a positive meaning and the other implies a negative sense of hostility. This can be clear seeing that the Arabic word for conquest (fatḥ ﻓﺘﺢ) is only used to express Muslim rule of other countries, while the Arabic word for occupation (iḥtilāl) is used to describe foreign rule for Muslim countries. In this sense, there are Arabic writings defending the Muslim rule of Iberian Peninsula (Andalusia) calling it conquest and refuse to call it occupation. This paper will try to discuss the difference between these two concepts (conquest, occupation), and on the other hand, it will try to apply these terms onto the case of Muslim rule in Iberian Peninsula, to determine whether it was a conquest or an occupation for the territories.

Abstract

In the past era, earlier before establishing the modern international law and the United Nations, both conquest and military occupation were worldwide happening all over the world. This includes the period of the existence of Islamic power in the Iberian Peninsula, which some describe as an occupation of other countries territories, while others describe it as a conquest for those territories. However, the word ‘conquest’ almost disappeared on describing wars for long time but reappeared in some news about wars of recent era, while the word ‘occupation’ continued and did not disappear from our modern world. Approaching the two concepts and explaining the similarity and difference between them can clarify the indications of applying each concept and the intentions behind this. In Arabic language, the language of Muslims holy book of Quran, the indication for the two concepts of ‘conquest’ and ‘occupation’ is totally different, in a way that many arguments can arouse to prove which of the two concepts give the right description for some cases. However, both of the two concepts have similarity in meaning on the point that both of them refer to an action using the force (usually military force) to control another country. In Arabic the difference indications of the two concepts is very obvious to show that one has a positive meaning and the other implies a negative sense of hostility. This can be clear seeing that the Arabic word for conquest (fatḥ ﻓﺘﺢ) is only used to express Muslim rule of other countries, while the Arabic word for occupation (iḥtilāl) is used to describe foreign rule for Muslim countries. In this sense, there are Arabic writings defending the Muslim rule of Iberian Peninsula (Andalusia) calling it conquest and refuse to call it occupation. This paper will try to discuss the difference between these two concepts (conquest, occupation), and on the other hand, it will try to apply these terms onto the case of Muslim rule in Iberian Peninsula, to determine whether it was a conquest or an occupation for the territories.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. "Land Grabs: Causes, Consequences, and the Evolution of Territorial Conquest" (2016)[URL]
  2. Amin, Ismael, "Les Arabes n'ont jamais envahi l'Espagne" (1991), Riad El-Rayyes Books
  3. Brownlie, I., "Principles of Public International Law" (1980), Oxford University Press
  4. "Why Spanish Nationalism Is on the Rise" (2018)[URL]
  5. "Military Occupation" (2013)[URL]
  6. Garber, Doris A., "The Development of the law of Belligerent Occupation 1863 - 1914: A Historical Survey" (1949), Columbia Univ. Press
  7. García-Sanjuán, Alejandro, "Rejecting al-Andalus, exalting the Reconquista: historical memory in contemporary Spain", Journal of Medieval Iberian Studies, 10(1) (2018)
  8. Hu, Henan, "The Doctrine of Occupation: An Analysis of Its Invalidity under the Framework of International Legal Positivism", Chinese Journal of International Law, 15(1) (2016)
  9. Jennings, R., "The Acquisition of Territory in International Law" (1963), Manchester University Press
  10. Kant, Immanuel, "Practical Philosophy" (1996), Cambridge University Press
  11. "conquest, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (MPEPIL)" (2015)[URL]
  12. Korman, Sharon, "The Right of Conquest: The Acquisition of Territory by Force in International Law and Practice" (1996), Oxford Univ. Press
  13. Lesaffer, Randall, "Argument from Roman Law in Current International Law", The European Journal of International Law, 16(1) (2005)
  14. Machiavelli, Niccolò, "The Prince" (1998), University of Chicago Press
  15. Machiavelli, Niccolò, "Discourses on Livy" (1996), University of Chicago Press
  16. Mu'nis, Husayn, "Dawn of Andalusia: A research of the History of Andalusia from Islamic conquest to Umayyad dynast (711-756)" (1959), Dar Elrashad
  17. "public domain. (Rendered into HTML and text by Jon Roland of the Constitution Society)"[URL]
  18. "This is why Isis attacked Barcelona" (2017)[URL]
  19. Shahlan, Ahmed, "Mille Ans De Vie Juive Au Maroc: Histoire, Culture, et Religion" (1987), Maisonneuve et Larose
  20. "Pope Francis says Islam and Christianity share an idea of conquest" (2016)[URL]
  21. "Conquest, Political Concepts, The New School for Social Research, Issue 1" (2011)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)