둔황 석굴의 후원자 호탄국[于闐國]왕, 그의 다양한 시각화
Dunhuang Mogao Cave's Supporter Khotanese King, and His Various Visualizations
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
At a specific time in the first half of the 10th century, Dunhuang Mogao Cave has two different Khotanese king images. It is the Khotanese King as a supporter of the Dunhuang Mogao Cave and the Khotanese King of the “New-Mode” Manjus'ru (Xinyang Wenshu; 新樣文殊) leading the Manjus´rı. This study seeks to find out why the two images of Khotanese King, with completely different roles, appear at Dunhuang Mogao Cave almost at the same time. For this purpose, this study focused on two questions. One is where a new Manjus´rı Iconography was formed called 'Xinyang Wenshu' and the other is why the Khotanese King started to draw Manjus´rı's lion, which used to be led by Kunlunnu (崑崙奴). This person under the same name with a different role, is Khotanese King, Lishengtien (李聖天). One of the most influential Khotanese kings, he was known as the Lion King (獅子王) to the Dunhuang, who overtook the lion. And the Khotan people believed that the incarnation of Manjus´rı played a major role in making Khotan characters and growing the country. For this reason, the Khotanese King was standing next to Manjus´rı, the lion, and he helped Manjus´rı. The Khotanese King of 'Xinyang Wenshu' is not a simple lion trainer but a constitution of a triad form focusing on Manjus´rı with Sudhna. The author says that 'Xinyang Wenshu' Iconography, which newly appeared in the early 10th century, was established in Dunhuang, reflecting the creative intentions of Dunhuang forces surrounding him along with Khotanese King, Lishengtien. The printing status of 'Xinyang Wenshu' prints is all different, confirming that Dunhuang is the production site of this print. 'Xinyang Wenshu' Iconography would have contributed greatly to informing Dunhuang about the influence of the Khotanese King, Lishengtien and Wǔtáishān faith in Manjus´rı for people who carried it with them and made offerings. In Buddhist art, ‘icon’ is understood as ‘the expression of contents or teachings in sutras using visual images.’ Because the meaning of an icon expressed in image can be grasped properly only based on the knowledge of the contents and belief of Buddhist scripture, the correct understanding of sutras has been regarded as essential for Buddhist art research. However, we should not overlook fact that ‘icons’ depicted in sutras have to be created by someone, and the icon ‘Xinyang Wenshu’ is a representative example showing the process clearly.
Abstract
At a specific time in the first half of the 10th century, Dunhuang Mogao Cave has two different Khotanese king images. It is the Khotanese King as a supporter of the Dunhuang Mogao Cave and the Khotanese King of the “New-Mode” Manjus'ru (Xinyang Wenshu; 新樣文殊) leading the Manjus´rı. This study seeks to find out why the two images of Khotanese King, with completely different roles, appear at Dunhuang Mogao Cave almost at the same time. For this purpose, this study focused on two questions. One is where a new Manjus´rı Iconography was formed called 'Xinyang Wenshu' and the other is why the Khotanese King started to draw Manjus´rı's lion, which used to be led by Kunlunnu (崑崙奴). This person under the same name with a different role, is Khotanese King, Lishengtien (李聖天). One of the most influential Khotanese kings, he was known as the Lion King (獅子王) to the Dunhuang, who overtook the lion. And the Khotan people believed that the incarnation of Manjus´rı played a major role in making Khotan characters and growing the country. For this reason, the Khotanese King was standing next to Manjus´rı, the lion, and he helped Manjus´rı. The Khotanese King of 'Xinyang Wenshu' is not a simple lion trainer but a constitution of a triad form focusing on Manjus´rı with Sudhna. The author says that 'Xinyang Wenshu' Iconography, which newly appeared in the early 10th century, was established in Dunhuang, reflecting the creative intentions of Dunhuang forces surrounding him along with Khotanese King, Lishengtien. The printing status of 'Xinyang Wenshu' prints is all different, confirming that Dunhuang is the production site of this print. 'Xinyang Wenshu' Iconography would have contributed greatly to informing Dunhuang about the influence of the Khotanese King, Lishengtien and Wǔtáishān faith in Manjus´rı for people who carried it with them and made offerings. In Buddhist art, ‘icon’ is understood as ‘the expression of contents or teachings in sutras using visual images.’ Because the meaning of an icon expressed in image can be grasped properly only based on the knowledge of the contents and belief of Buddhist scripture, the correct understanding of sutras has been regarded as essential for Buddhist art research. However, we should not overlook fact that ‘icons’ depicted in sutras have to be created by someone, and the icon ‘Xinyang Wenshu’ is a representative example showing the process clearly.
참고문헌 (59)
- "廣淸凉傳 卷中 T51", ~
- "三寶感應要略録 T2084", ~
- "宋高僧傳 卷2 唐五大山佛陀波利傳", ~
- "宋史 卷490" (1977), 中華書局
- "新唐書 卷221下" (1975), 中華書局
- 張彦遠, "歷代名畫記 卷三", 唐西域記 卷第12 瞿薩旦那國 T2087, ~
- 賈應逸, "중앙아시아의 역사와 문화", pp.140~131 (2007), 솔
- 엔닌, "입당구법순례행기", pp.189~ (2007), 선인
- 최선아, "돈황(敦煌) 막고굴(莫高窟) 제61굴과 오대산(五臺山) 문수진용(文殊眞容)", 민족문화연구, (64), pp.135~175 (2014), 민족문화연구원
- 허형욱, "崑崙奴 도상에 관한 연구 -法住寺 石造人物像을 중심으로-", 불교미술사학, 4, pp.78~87 (2006)
- 荣新江, "从敦煌的五台山绘画和文献看五代宋初中原与河西于阗间的文化交往", 文博, pp.68~75 (1987)
- 菊竹淳一, "敦煌の佛敎版畵—大英博物館とパリ國立圖書館收藏品を中心に—", 佛敎藝術, 101, pp.3~35 (1975)
- 金申, "佛敎美術叢論", pp.135~142 (2004), 科學出版社
- 祁英涛, "南禅寺大殿修复", 文物, pp.61~ (1980)
- 谭树桐, "敦煌唐塑和南禅寺彩塑艺术的比较研究", 敦煌研究, pp.77~ (1988)
- 敦煌文物研究所, "莫高窟第220窟新发现的复壁壁画", 文物, pp.41~46 (1978)
- 敦煌文物硏究院, "敦煌莫高窟供養人題記", pp.101~104 (1986), 文物出版社
- 杜瑞平, "中国文化研究", pp.131~135 (2010)
- 毛利 久, "淸凉寺釋迦像變遷考", 佛敎藝術, 35, pp.1~23 (1958)
- 潘亮文, "敦煌唐代的文殊菩萨图像试析", 敦煌研究, 139, pp.86~102 (2013)
- 沙武田, "敦煌归义军史专题研究", pp.657~676 (2009), 甘肅文化出版社
- 沙武田, "敦煌P.4049“新样文殊”画稿及相关问题研究", 敦煌研究, pp.26~32 (2005)
- 沙武田, "敦煌画稿研究", pp.155~173 (2007), 中央編譯出版社
- 再收錄, "敦煌石窟于阗国王画像研究", 新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 27(4), pp.23~ (2006)
- 寺本婉雅, "于闐國佛敎史の硏究", pp.22~ (1974), 國書刊行會
- 山崎元一, "山本博士還曆記念論文集" (1972), 山川出版社
- 小島 彩, "騎象普賢と騎獅文殊の圖像-中國における成立過程", 美術史, 137, pp.43~59 (1995)
- 孙修身, "四川地区文殊菩萨信仰述论", 敦煌研究, pp.84~ (1997)
- 孙修身, "中國新樣文殊與日本文殊三尊五尊像之比較研究", 敦煌研究, pp.44~58 (1996)
- 荣新江, "10—11世紀於闐玉的東漸敦煌與中原", 敦煌研究, pp.190~200 (2014)
- 荣新江, "九,十世紀於闐族屬考辨", 新疆社會科學, pp.76~83 (1987)
- 荣新江, "敦煌文獻和繪畫反映的五代宋初中原與西北地區的文化交往", 北京大學學報(哲學社會科學版), pp.55~62 (1988)
- 榮新江, "於闐國王李聖天事跡新證", 西域研究, pp.8~ (2012)
- 奧 健夫, "淸凉寺釋迦如來像", 日本の美術, 513 (2009), 至文堂
- 王使臻, "曹元忠,曹延禄父子两代与于阗政权的联姻", 敦煌学辑刊, pp.27~28 (2015)
- 長岡龍作, "世界美術全集 東洋編 第5卷 五代․北宋․遼․西夏", pp.327~330 (1998), 小學館
- 張惠明, "俄藏柏孜克里克石窟的一幅高昌回鶻時期的五臺山文殊圖壁畫研究", 敦煌吐鲁番研究, 15, pp.157~179 (2015)
- 才吾加甫, "藏文文献所见于阗佛教", 西域研究, pp.75~ (2011)
- 赤木崇敏, "10世纪コ一タンの王統·年号问题新史料—敦煌秘笈羽686文书—", 内陸アヅア言语の研究, 27, pp.101~128 (2013)
- 井上正, "(特別展覽會)釋迦信仰と淸凉寺", pp.4~12 (1982), 京都國立博物館
- 赵云旗, "论南禅寺的雕塑艺术", 五台山研究, pp.33~39 (1987)
- 池田溫, "中國古代籍帳硏究 : 槪觀, 錄文", pp.610~ (1979), 東京大學東洋文化硏究所
- 陈菊霞, "敦煌翟氏與敦煌士族間的通婚", 敦煌學輯刊, pp.29~35 (2007)
- 陈菊霞, "敦煌翟氏研究", 博士, pp.2008
- 陳粟裕, "“新樣文殊”中的於闐王形象研究", 藝術設計研究, pp.16~23 (2014)
- 陳粟裕, "五代宋初時期於闐王族的漢化研究 -以敦煌石窟中的於闐王族供養像爲中心", 美术研究, pp.21~28 (2014)
- 崔福姫, "五台山文殊信仰における化現", 佛教大学大学院紀要, 33, pp.16~ (2005)
- 崔福姫, "『古淸凉傳』から 『廣淸凉傳』への文殊信仰の變遷 文殊槪念を中心に", 印度學佛敎學硏究, 52, pp.192~194 (2003), 日本印度學佛敎學會
- 许栋, "新样文殊中的于阗王及其相关问题研究—以敦煌发现的新样文殊图像为中心", 吐鲁番学研究, pp.81~91 (2016)
- 玄奘著, "中外交通史籍叢刊", pp.1006~1008 (1990), 中華書局
- 黄盛璋, "《钢和泰藏卷》与西北史地研究", 新疆社会科学, pp.60~ (1984)
- 黄盛璋, "关于沙州曹氏和于闻交往的诸藏文文书及相关问题", 敦煌研究, pp.38~ (1992)
- Gregory Henderson, "The Buddha of Seiryōji: New Finds and New Theory", Artibus Asiae, 19(1), pp.27~30 (1956)
- H. W. Bailey, "Khotanese Buddhist Text", pp.52~ (1981), Cambridge University Press
- Lin, Wei-Cheng, "Building a Sacred Mountain : The Buddhist Architecture of China's Mount Wutai", pp.176~ (2014), University of Washington Press
- Ning Qiang, "Art, Religion and Politics: Dunhuang Cave 220", Ph.D, pp.1997
- R. E. Emmerick, "Tibetan Texts Concerning Khotan", pp.48~49 (1967), Oxford University Press
- Wei-Cheng Lin, "Building a Sacred Mountain: The Buddhist Architecture of China's Mount Wutai, Art History Publicatoin Initiative Books", pp.178~ (2014), University of Washington Press
- Wong, Dorothy C., "A Reassessment of the Representation of Mt. Wutai from Dunhuang Cave 61", Archives of Asian Art, 46, pp.37~ (1993)