본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

유기 및 관행농법 농경지의 무척추동물 생물다양성 비교

Comparative Analysis on the Invertebrate Biodiversity between Organic and ConventionalAgriculture Fields

김태연|조영주|문명진|김훈|김교진|서재휘|최가인
한국유기농업학회 (Korea Association Of Organic Agriculture)|2017.11|한국유기농업학회지 (Korea Journal of Organic Agriculture)|제25권 제4호|pp. 875-900

1

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

biodiversityorganic agricultureinvertebrateconventional agriculture

초록

Although some skeptical views arguing that the impact of organic farming is quite limited to sustainable biodiversity, the organic agriculture has been generally accepted to have positive effects on various properties of soils not only on biophysical and ecological properties but also on biodiversity of the field. Therefore, this field investigation has been conducted to examine the effect of organic farming, relative to conventional agriculture, through a comparative investigations of the two systems for conserving local biodiversity of invertebrate animals. For this research, organic and conventional farming locations matched with both of a paddy field and a upland fields in Goesan-gun province (Chungcheongbuk-do, South Korea) were selected to compare the species richness of invertebrate biodiversity as follows: location OP (Organic Paddy field), location OU (Organic Upland field), location CP (Conventional Paddy field), and location CU (Conventional Upland field). Among 249 species collected, the numbers of species collected in the locations practicing organic farming were greater than the locations practicing conventional farming both in paddy fields (104 vs. 84 species) and upland fields (108 vs. 77 species). Changes in species richness can be shown in the selected locations depending on the agriculture system with organic (50 species) or conventional (44 species) farming systems in the paddy fields, similarly with organic (42 species) or conventional (35 species) farming in the upland fields, respectively. Our present research clearly shows that a wide range of taxa, including insects, spiders and other invertebrates, benefit from organic management through increases in abundance or species richness. It has been also identified that four orders (Hemiptera, Diptera, Hynemoptera, and Araneae) that are largely intrinsic to organic paddy field, and another three orders (Hemiptera, Coleoptera, and Araneae) that are particularly beneficial for organic crop field regime.

Abstract

Although some skeptical views arguing that the impact of organic farming is quite limited to sustainable biodiversity, the organic agriculture has been generally accepted to have positive effects on various properties of soils not only on biophysical and ecological properties but also on biodiversity of the field. Therefore, this field investigation has been conducted to examine the effect of organic farming, relative to conventional agriculture, through a comparative investigations of the two systems for conserving local biodiversity of invertebrate animals. For this research, organic and conventional farming locations matched with both of a paddy field and a upland fields in Goesan-gun province (Chungcheongbuk-do, South Korea) were selected to compare the species richness of invertebrate biodiversity as follows: location OP (Organic Paddy field), location OU (Organic Upland field), location CP (Conventional Paddy field), and location CU (Conventional Upland field). Among 249 species collected, the numbers of species collected in the locations practicing organic farming were greater than the locations practicing conventional farming both in paddy fields (104 vs. 84 species) and upland fields (108 vs. 77 species). Changes in species richness can be shown in the selected locations depending on the agriculture system with organic (50 species) or conventional (44 species) farming systems in the paddy fields, similarly with organic (42 species) or conventional (35 species) farming in the upland fields, respectively. Our present research clearly shows that a wide range of taxa, including insects, spiders and other invertebrates, benefit from organic management through increases in abundance or species richness. It has been also identified that four orders (Hemiptera, Diptera, Hynemoptera, and Araneae) that are largely intrinsic to organic paddy field, and another three orders (Hemiptera, Coleoptera, and Araneae) that are particularly beneficial for organic crop field regime.

참고문헌 (46)

  1. Allison, G., "The Influence of Species Diversity and Stress Intensity on Community Resistance and Resilience", Ecol. Monogr, 74, pp.117~134 (2004)
  2. Bengtsson, J., "The Effects of Organic Agriculture on Biodiversity and Abundance: a Meta-analysis", J. Appl. Ecol, 42, pp.261~269 (2005)
  3. Billeter, R., "Indicators for Biodiversity in Agricultural Landscapes: a Pan-European Study", J. Appl. Ecol, 45, pp.141~150 (2008)
  4. Boutin, C., "Arthropod Diversity as Affected by Agricultural Management (Organic and Conventional Farming), Plant Species, and Landscape Context", Ecoscience, 16, pp.492~501 (2008)
  5. Chung, C. S., "The Effects of Temperatures on the Development of Oriental Tabacco Budmoth, Heliothis assulta Guenee, and Control Effects of Thrucide HP®", Korean J. Pl. Prot, 19, pp.57~65 (1980)
  6. Cônsoli1, F. L., "Side-effects of Insecticides Used in Tomato Fields on The Egg Parasitoid Trichogramma pretiosum Riley (Hym., Trichogrammatidae), A Natural Enemy of Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lep., Gelechiidae)", J. Appl. Entomol, 122, pp.43~47 (2009)
  7. Trends of some Agri-environmental Indicators in the European Union, "De Roeck, E.", European Commission Directorate General Joint Research Centre, ~, pp.Report EUR 21 669 EN (2005)
  8. Desneux, N., "The Sublethal Effects of Pesticides on Beneficial Arthropods", Annu. Rev. Entomol, 52, pp.81~106 (2007)
  9. Erwin, T. L., "Tropical Forests: Their Richness in Coleoptera and Other Arthropod Species", The Coleopt. Bull, 36, pp.74~75 (1982)
  10. Gabriel, D., "Food Production vs. Biodiversity: Comparing Organic and Conventional Agriculture", J. Appl. Ecol, 50, pp.355~364 (2013)
  11. Grant, I. F., "Regulation of Invertebrate Grazers as a Means to Enhance Biomass and Nitrogen Fixation of Cyanophyceae in Wetland Rice Fields", Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J, 47, pp.669~675 (1983)
  12. Hadjicharalampous, E., "Soil Arthropods (Coleoptera, Isopoda) in Organic and Conventional Agroecosystems", Environ. Manage, 29, pp.683~690 (2002)
  13. 한민수, "논 생태계 내 유기농법 재배 지역과 관행농법 재배 지역의 저서무척추동물군집의 특성", 한국환경농학회지, 32(1), pp.17~23 (2013), 한국환경농학회[DOI]
  14. Hole, D. G., "Does Organic Farming Benefit Biodiversity?", Biol. Conserv, 122, pp.113~130 (2005)
  15. 강방훈, "농촌지역 소규모 소택형습지의 식생특성", 한국환경복원기술학회지, 12(3), pp.33~48 (2009), 한국환경복원기술학회
  16. 김도익, "유기와 관행재배 배 과수원의 무척추동물의 종 다양성 연구", 한국유기농업학회지, 19(1), pp.93~107 (2011), 한국유기농업학회
  17. 의 효과적 방제를 위한 쌀좀알벌(Trichogramma evanescens Westwood)과 미생물제제의 종합생물방제 효과, "한국응용곤충학회지", 2008, 435~445, pp.한국응용곤충학회
  18. 김명현, "관행농업과 유기농업이 논둑에 서식하는 토양배회성 무척추동물에 미치는 영향", 한국유기농업학회지, 24(3), pp.539~556 (2016), 한국유기농업학회
  19. Klaus, V. H., "Does Organic Grassland Farming Benefit Plant and Arthropod Diversity at the Expense of Yield and Soil Fertility?", Agric. Ecosyst. Environ, 177, pp.1~9 (2013)
  20. Korea National Arboretum, "Insects of Korea" (2012), Geobook Publishing Co.
  21. Lee, M., "Utilization of Organic Farming for in situ Conservation of Biodiversity", Proceedings of the 4th ISOFAR Scientific Conference: ‘Building Organic Bridges’, 4, pp.953~956 (2014)
  22. 이수연, "관행 고추밭과 유기농 고추밭에서 절지동물의 군집 구조와 생물다양성의 비교", 한국유기농업학회지, 21(4), pp.601~615 (2013), 한국유기농업학회
  23. Letourneau, D. K., "Pest Damage and Arthropod Community Structure in Organic vs. Conventional Tomato Production in California", J. Appl. Ecol, 38, pp.557~570 (2001)
  24. Lindenmayer, D. B., "Indicators of Biodiversity for Ecologically Sustainable Forest Management", Conserv. Biol, 14, pp.941~950 (2000)
  25. Ma, S. M., "Review of History and Recent Development of Organic Farming Worldwide", Agr. Sci. China, 5, pp.169~178 (2006)
  26. Mader, P., "Soil Fertility and Biodiversity in Organic Farming", Science, 296, pp.1694~1697 (2002)
  27. Mesléard, F., "Uselessness and Indirect Negative Effects of an Insecticide on Rice Field Invertebrates", C. R. Biol, 328, pp.955~962 (2005)
  28. Michelsen, J., "Recent Development and Political Acceptance of Organic Farming in Europe", J. Eur. Soc. Rural Sociol, 41, pp.3~20 (2001)
  29. Montanez, M. N., "Impact of Organic Crops on the Diversity of Insects: A Review of Recent Research", Rev. Colomb. Entomol, 40, pp.131~142 (2014)
  30. 문형철, "전북지역 노지 고추에서의 총채벌레 발생과 피해", 한국응용곤충학회지, 45(1), pp.9~13 (2006), 한국응용곤충학회
  31. Inventory and Management of Endemic Species of Korea, "National Institute of Biological Resources", National Institute of Biological Resources, ~ (2012)
  32. Oehl, F., "Impact of Land Use Intensity on the Species Diversity of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in Agroecosytems of Central Europe", Appl. Environ. Microbiol, 5, pp.2816~2824 (2003)
  33. 박광래, "논습지 가치평가를 위한 유기재배 논의 식생특성 분석", 한국습지학회지, 14(1), pp.59~73 (2012), 한국습지학회
  34. Pimm, S. L., "The Complexity and Stability of Ecosystems", Nature, 307, pp.321~326 (1984)
  35. Power E. F., "Organic Dairy Farming: Impact on Insect-flower Interaction Networks and Pollination", J. Appl. Ecol, 48, pp.561~569 (2011)
  36. Power, E. F., "Organic Farming and Landscape Structure: Effects on Insect-Pollinated Plant Diversity in Intensively Managed Grasslands", PLoS ONE, 7, pp.e38073~ (2012)
  37. Rundolf, M., "The Effect of Organic Farming on Butterfly Diversity Depends on Landscape Context", J. Appl. Ecol, 43, pp.1121~1127 (2006)
  38. Rural Development Administration, "Aquatic Invertebrate in Paddy Ecosystem of Korea", Rural Development Administration, ~ (2008)
  39. 송장훈, "배 유기재배 과수원의 병해충 관리 실태 및 생물 다양성", 한국유기농업학회지, 21(4), pp.617~627 (2013), 한국유기농업학회
  40. Takada M. B., "Comparison of Generalist Predators in Winter-flooded and Conventionally Managed Rice Paddies and Identification of Their Limiting Factors", SpringerPlus, 3, pp.418~ (2014)
  41. Theiling, K. M., "Pesticide Side-effects on Arthropod Natural Enemies: A Database Summary", Agri. Ecosys. Environ, 21, pp.191~218 (1988)
  42. Agri-environmental Indicators for Sustainable Agriculture in Europe, "Wascher, D. W.", European Centre for Nature Conservation, ~ (2000)
  43. Weibull, A. C., "Species Richness in the Effect of Landscape, Habitat and Farm Management", Biodivers. Conserv, 12, pp.1335~1355 (2003)
  44. Wilson, A. L., "Stable Isotope Analysis of Aquatic Invertebrate Communities in Irrigated Rice Fields Cultivated Under Different Management Regimes", Aquat. Ecol, 39, pp.189~200 (2005)
  45. Wright, S. F., "Changes in Aggregate Stability and Concentration of Glomalin during Tillage Management Transition", Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J, 63, pp.1825~1829 (1999)
  46. 양정오, "고추와 토마토 품종별 담배가루이 B와 Q biotype의 섭식행동 비교", 한국응용곤충학회지, 48(2), pp.179~188 (2009), 한국응용곤충학회

관련 논문AI추천

농법 차이에 따른 농경지 생태계의 생물 다양성 및 군집 구조의 변화김훈, 순옌, 김교진, 김태연, 문명진, 조영주한국유기농업학회 · 한국유기농업학회지2018 · 제26권 제4호괴산군 지역 농업 생태계의 곤충 다양성 비교 분석김훈, 순옌, 구본진, 구윤모, 김태연, 문명진, 이승민한국유기농업학회 · 한국유기농업학회지2021 · 제29권 제4호논 생태계 내 유기농법 재배 지역과 관행농법 재배 지역의 저서무척추동물군집의 특성강기경, 김명현, 김미란, 김혜림, 나영은, 남형규, 한민수한국환경농학회 · 한국환경농학회지2013 · 제32권 제1호관행농업과 유기농업이 논둑에 서식하는 토양배회성 무척추동물에 미치는 영향강기경, 김명현, 나영은, 어진우, 최락중, 최순군, 한민수한국유기농업학회 · 한국유기농업학회지2016 · 제24권 제3호유기와 관행재배 배 과수원의 무척추동물의 종 다양성 연구강범룡, 고숙주, 김도익, 김상수, 김선국, 임경호, 최덕수한국유기농업학회 · 한국유기농업학회지2011 · 제19권 제1호농경지의 이용형태가 토양성 절지동물 군집 및 다양성에 미치는 영향김명현, 남형규, 송영주, 어진우한국환경농학회 · 한국환경농학회지2019 · 제38권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)

외식 프랜차이즈 선택요인이 브랜드 충성도와 재방문의도에 미치는 영향 연구 -동경(東京)지역 한국 외식 프랜차이즈를 이용하는 소비자 설문조사를 중심으로-황재현, 김선현pp. 663-677친환경농가와 관행농가의 경영효율성에 관한 연구 : 딸기와 토마토를 중심으로양성범, 한별pp. 679-697당뇨병 환자 맞춤형 농식품 식단에 대한 소비자 지불의사금액이상호pp. 699-710농산물을 활용한 6차 산업 창업 비즈니스 모델 개발김희동pp. 711-724킬레이트 유기 미네랄 액비가 ‘죽향’ 딸기의 생육 및 과실품질에 미치는 영향이철규, 채효석, 노혜지, 조향현pp. 725-736
원문 보기