본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

공간구문론을 이용한 대학교 캠퍼스 코어의 공간구조 유형 및 특성 분석

A Study on the Analysis of the Configuration and Properties of University Campus Cores through Space Syntax

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류건축공학

초록

The purpose of this study is to analyze the configuration and properties of university campus cores for systematic approach and planning through space syntax based on master plans of 55 universities in Korea. The results of this study showed that: first, the campus cores were classified into 10 types through axial map analysis. They were ‘ㅡ type’, ‘二 type’, ‘ㄱ type’, ‘T type’, ‘+ type’, ‘radiation type’, ‘grid type’, ‘polygon type’, ‘tree structure type’ and 'combination type’.(table 7) The frequency of ‘ㅡ type’ was the highest by 27.2%, and ‘radiation type’ was the next by 14.5%; second, the integration value was 2.03(+ type), te90(grid type), te75(ㄱ type), te74(ㅡ type), te67(二 type), te63(T type), te46(polygon type), te347(tree structure type) and te343(radiation type).(table 9) We could categorize the ‘radiation type’ and the 'tree structure type’ as the first group, the ‘polygon type’ as the second group, the ‘T type’, the ‘二 type’, the ‘ㅡ type’, and the ‘ㄱ type’ as the third group, the ‘grid type’ as the fourth group, the ‘+ type’ as the fifth group; third, cases that the integration value of access road was very low(58.2%) was much more frequent than that of very high(32.7%); fourth, the most important space in the campus core were as follows: library and media center(18.1%), administration buildings and headquarters(15.7%), student center(15.7%), lecturing building(13.9%), streets and squares(13.3%).

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the configuration and properties of university campus cores for systematic approach and planning through space syntax based on master plans of 55 universities in Korea. The results of this study showed that: first, the campus cores were classified into 10 types through axial map analysis. They were ‘ㅡ type’, ‘二 type’, ‘ㄱ type’, ‘T type’, ‘+ type’, ‘radiation type’, ‘grid type’, ‘polygon type’, ‘tree structure type’ and 'combination type’.(table 7) The frequency of ‘ㅡ type’ was the highest by 27.2%, and ‘radiation type’ was the next by 14.5%; second, the integration value was 2.03(+ type), te90(grid type), te75(ㄱ type), te74(ㅡ type), te67(二 type), te63(T type), te46(polygon type), te347(tree structure type) and te343(radiation type).(table 9) We could categorize the ‘radiation type’ and the 'tree structure type’ as the first group, the ‘polygon type’ as the second group, the ‘T type’, the ‘二 type’, the ‘ㅡ type’, and the ‘ㄱ type’ as the third group, the ‘grid type’ as the fourth group, the ‘+ type’ as the fifth group; third, cases that the integration value of access road was very low(58.2%) was much more frequent than that of very high(32.7%); fourth, the most important space in the campus core were as follows: library and media center(18.1%), administration buildings and headquarters(15.7%), student center(15.7%), lecturing building(13.9%), streets and squares(13.3%).

참고문헌 (10)

  1. 김종석, "국립대학 캠퍼스 유형에 의한 대학시설의 특성", 한국교육시설학회지, 6(3) (1999)
  2. 김학철, "대학 캠퍼스 외부공간의 연계성과 위계성에 관한 연구", 대한건축학회 학술발표대회논문집, 11(2), pp.309~ (1991)
  3. 박준수, "대학 캠퍼스 건물 내부휴게공간의 공간적 특성에 관한 연구", 교육시설, 10(3), pp.37~43 (2003), 한국교육시설학회
  4. 서기영, "대학 캠퍼스 계획에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1992
  5. 안경환, "캠퍼스 마스터플랜의 構成과 計劃方法에 관한 硏究", 교육시설, 15(5), pp.5~12 (2008), 한국교육시설학회
  6. 이정엽, "대학캠퍼스 배치체계의 변천특성에 관한 연구", 대한건축학회 학술대회 발표논문집, 7(1) (1987)
  7. 임성우, "대학 캠퍼스의 공간배치 유형분석에 관한 연구", 대한건축학회 학술발표대회 논문집, 14(1), pp.131~ (1994)
  8. 조용준, "대학캠퍼스 코아 부분의 입지형태에 관한 연구", 대한건축학회 논문집 (1992)
  9. 최진희, "대학 캠퍼스 마스터플랜의 중심공간의 성격과 외부공간의 위계에 관한 연구", 교육시설, 16(3), pp.59~67 (2009), 한국교육시설학회
  10. Roger Trancik, "Finding lost space, theories of urban design" (1986), Wiley

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)